Ielts reading question-type based tests true false not given matching headings

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

---

Welcome to Mr Aslanov’s Lessons 
QUESTION-TYPE BASED TESTS 
FunEnglishwithme [phone] 
TEST 4 – Theory or Practice? —What is the point of 
research carried out by biz schools? 
Complete each sentence with the correct ending 
A-E
. 
 
1. 
Most professors support academic research 
because 
2. 
Schools support academic research because 
3. 
Our society needs academic research 
because 
4. 
Universities resisting the AACSB should 
change because
A 
it progresses as we learn innovative ways of doing 
things. 
B 
the trends and standards are changing. 
C 
their jobs depend on it. 
D 
they care about their school rankings and government 
funds. 
E 
it helps students to go into top business firms.
 
Students go to universities and other academic institutions to prepare for their future. We pay tuition 
and struggle through classes in the hopes that we can find a fulfilling and exciting career. But the choice of 
your university has a large influence on your future. How can you know which university will prepare you 
the best for your future? Like other academic institutions, business schools are judged by the quality of the 
research carried out by their faculties. Professors must both teach students and also produce original research 
in their own field. 
The quality of this research is assessed by academic publications. At the same time, universities have 
another responsibility to equip their students for the real world, however that is defined. Most students 
learning from professors will not go into academics themselves—so how do academics best prepare them 
for their future careers, whatever that may be? Whether academic research actually produces anything that is 
useful to the practice of business, or even whether it is its job to do so, are questions that can provoke 
vigorous arguments on campus. 
The debate, which first flared during the 1950s, was reignited in August, when AACSB International. 
the most widely recognised global accrediting agency for business schools, announced it would consider 
changing the way it evaluates research. The news followed rather damning criticism in 2002 from Jeffrey 
Pfefler. a Stanford professor, and Christina Fong of Washington University, which questioned whether 
business education in its current guise was sustainable. The study found that traditional modes of academia 
were not adequately preparing students for the kind of careers they faced in current times. The most 
controversial recommendation in AACSB’s draft report (which was sent round to administrators for their 
comment) is that the schools should be required to demonstrate the value of their faculties’ research not 
simply by listing its citations in journals, but by demonstrating the impact it has in the professional world. 
New qualifiers, such as average incomes, student placement in top firms and business collaborations would 
now be considered just as important as academic publications. 
AACSB justifies its stance by saying that it wants schools and faculty to play to their strengths, 
whether they be in pedagogy, in the research of practical applications, or in scholarly endeavor. 
Traditionally, universities operate in a pyramid structure. Everyone enters and stays in an attempt to be 
successful in their academic field. A psychology professor must publish competitive research in the top 
neuroscience journals. A Cultural Studies professor must send graduate students on new field research 
expeditions to be taken seriously. This research is the core of a university’s output. And research of any kind 
is expensive—AACSB points out that business schools in America alone spend more than $320m a year on 
it. So it seems legitimate to ask for, 'what purpose it is undertaken? 
If a school chose to specialise in professional outputs rather than academic outputs, it could use such 
a large sum of money and redirect it into more fruitful programs. For example, if a business school wanted a 
larger presence of employees at top financial firms, this money may be better spent on a career center which 
focuses on building the skills of students, rather than paying for more high-level research to be done through 
the effort of faculty. A change in evaluation could also open the door to inviting more professionals from 

---