Jumaeva nasiba komil qizi lexical and semantic characteristics of hyponomic relations in words in english and

Conclusion of chapter III. 
In recent years, the study of linguistics and learning the specialized language 
has becoming undergoing a ‘cognitive shift’ which places a greater focus on more 
conceptual representations and knowledge organizations. Additionally, much 
researches have targeted the development of semi-automatized procedures for 
exracting especially for hyponymic term pairs and its relationship in language 
systems. Although recent studied linguistic works have focused on other 
77
Amaro R. Mendes S. & Marrafa P. Increasing Density through New Relations and PoS Encoding in WordNet.PT, 
International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications. Bahri Publications. India. ISSN 0976-
0962.2013. - P. 1–12 

---

78 
conceptual relations, such as meronymy, hyponymy, casuality and function, 
hyponymy is considered that it is a complex relation that requires a more in-depth 
study and research. According to the English linguist Barriere ’s opinion and Gil-
Berrozpe and Faber’s opinions “As the backbone of hierarchical organization, it 
entails both categorization and property inheritance.
Moreover, it is characterized by a variety of nuances and dimensions that 
should be further exploited
78
. In this pilot study, we reconstructed the taxonomies 
of rain ( a natural entity) and melting (a natural process). The results of this
hierarchies were based fundamentally on the research study of the default modifier 
word sketch , from which hyponymy can be extracted by analyzing the 
composition of multiword terms; a customized word sketch based on hyponymic 
knowledge pattern, where hyponymy was explicitly conveyed in the texts. The 
results showed that hyponymy subtypes were based on the semantic category of 
the concept, and were constrained by the nature of the concept, namely, whether it 
was an entity or a process. This paper presents the results of a new study on 
hyponymy subtypes that includes concepts belonging to a wider range of semantic 
categories (e.g. activities, chemical elements, landforms, element, phenomenon, 
process etc.), and analyzes the behavior of the knowledge patterns used to extract 
hyponymic relations. 
In this study we can come acrros more specific information about this theme
such as data, the relation of hyperonymy / hyponymy allows organizing the lexical 
items according to their type, since each hyponym has all the properties of its 
hyperonym plus some other aspect that characterizes it specifically and 
distinguishes it from all its cohyponyms. In this way, the hyperonymy / hyponymy 
relationship simultaneously contemplates the definition of a monotonic inheritance 
78
Barrière Caroline. Building a Concept Hierarchy from Corpus Analysis. Terminology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. 
2004. 10(2). – P. 241–263. 
John Benjamins. Juan Carlos Gil Berrozpe. Corpus-Based Identification Of Hyponym Subtypes And Knowledge 
Patterns In The Environmental Domain. 2017. Universidad De Granada. Máster Universitario En Traducción 
Profesiona. - P. 9-12 

---

79 
mechanism – by contrast, for example, to what happens in the Generative Lexicon 
model described above – that allows the description of lexical items in a very 
economical way. Hyponyms inherit the conceptual properties of their hypernyms. 
When we come to study and research the hyponymic relations in word, we come 
across several categories of the researching the hyponymy subtype in this paper, 
they are following categories which are considered important in analyzing the 
hyponyms, the first one is ID number of the hypernym; hypernym; general 
semantic category of the hypernym; hyponym; semantic category of the 
hyponym; hyponymy subtype derived from the hypernym-hyponym pair.