After the Washington congress, Zamenhof and Sébert produced the set of rules that
were to govern future congresses. According to these rules, only the “regularly elected
delegates from Esperanto groups and associations” with more than twenty-five paid-up
the subject of his speech at the seventh congress in Antwerp (1911). In Antwerp, the
themselves, and the ordinary congress participants lost the right to vote at the Universal
33
The eighth Universal Congress took place in Cracow in 1912 and had as its theme
the quarter-century anniversary of Esperanto. At this congress, Zamenhof announced
that he was giving up any role in Esperanto so that his political and religious ideas
would not be considered those of the Esperanto movement.
Although Zamenhof had often spoken of the congresses as celebrations, they were
tiring for him. According to his brother Lev, even during the first congresses he was ill
with arteriosclerosis and each congress caused his health to deteriorate further. Lev
wrote that being present during the congresses was for Zamenhof “not a joyous triumph,
but a painful duty”. The first two congresses, during which he suffered from the bullying
of the leading Parisian Esperantists, demanded enormous amounts of nervous energy
from him.
The jubilee congress in Cracow was also difficult for him. Having learned that the
Local Congress Committee was planning to honour him in Cracow, he asked that it not
do so. The reason for his request was that articles often appeared in Poland denouncing
Esperanto. These negative articles were different from those of other countries, however,
because instead of criticizing the idea or the language, they were directed against
Zamenhof himself, whose faults were that he was a Jew and he was born in Litva. He
knew that honouring him would incite Polish patriots, who rejected Esperanto as having
been created by a Litvak. He asked also that he not be identified as a Pole, so that Polish
nationalists would not be able to claim that he had adopted the guise of a nation to which
he did not belong in order to receive an honour.
After the Cracow congress, Zamenhof was attacked anyway, but by Jewish patriots,
because of an episode during the congress in which he had not supported a proposal by
the Jewish participants to bring greetings to the congress in the name of the Jewish
people. Jewish journalist took note of this and criticized Zamenhof in two post-congress
articles: La juda demando en kongreso de Esperanto (The Jewish Question at the
Congress of Esperanto) by Dov Ber Borochov in Di Varhajt (The Truth) (New York, 15
September, 1912) and Skandalo ĉe Esperantista kongreso (Scandal at the Congress of
Esperantists) published anonymously in
Togblat (
Daily Paper) in Lvov (16 August,
1912). Zamenhof had to publish a response to Di Varhajt in order to disavow the
statement the paper had attributed to him: “In order not to damage Esperanto, I have to
hide my Jewishness”. In his response, he wrote:
Every Esperantist in the world knows full well that I am a Jew, because I
have never hidden the fact, although I do not shout it chauvinistically from
the rooftops. Esperantists know that I have translated texts from the Yiddish
language; they know that for more than three years I have devoted all my
free time to translating the Bible from the Hebrew original; they know that I
have always lived in an exclusively Jewish quarter of Warsaw (where many
Jews are ashamed to live); they know that I have always had my works
34
printed by a Jewish printer, etc. Are these the acts of someone who is
ashamed of his origins and who is trying to hide his Jewishness? (
Mi estas
Homo 201)
Dostları ilə paylaş: