336
NEED ANALYSIS ON THE MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT OF
TEACHING ESP SPEAKING
Fitria Lapele
State Islamic Institute of Ambon, Indonesia
fitrialapele@iainambon.ac.id
ABSTRACT University students must prepare themselves to be success in the global workforce.
Hence, they should be able to speak English in the concerned fields of their specific major. In
fact, speaking English for Specific Purpose (ESP) Students, especially students of non-English
Language Education Department face some difficulties in constructing a good speaking. In this
case, the ESP Speaking teacher should provide the good materials to help students master it easily.
The teachers should consider using real life, authentic materials that reflect the target audience
specialization. This study aimed to analyze the students’ needs on material development of ESP
Speaking at University of Muhammadiyah Malang. It was intended to know the types of needs
analysis conducted by the teachers for developing the materials. That is why; a narrative design
was used to gather the research data. Besides, the instruments were interview guide and teachers’
documents. The result showed that: The teachers conducted four
types of needs analysis for
developing the materials, they are Target Situation Analysis, Wants, Means, and Subjective Needs
Analysis, Present Situation Analysis, and Lack Analysis. All the types the teachers have done in
knowing students’ needs of ESP Speaking were generally in line with the requirements of good
ways to develop ESP Speaking materials.
Keywords: ESP, Material Development, Need Analysis, Speaking
A. INTRODUCTION
n
glish for Specific Purpose (ESP) plays an important role in university. University
students must prepare themselves to be successful members of the global workforce.
Yoseto (2007) found that 46% students of Mechanical Engineering Department said
that materials for ESP course in their class were supporting materials for their future career. It
can be said that the role of ESP for university students is totally important. Speaking for specific
purposes in university level is very necessary for the students in the concerned fields of their
major. In fact, to speak English is not easy because a speaker should be able to master the
elements of speaking English such as grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, intonation, fluency,
body language, and gesture. Many of students by the end of their study period were still not
able to speak English fluently (Poedjiastutie, 2017). Floriasti (2013) found that there were many
errors done by the students when speaking. There were errors in the accuracy, pronunciation,
spelling, stress, rhythm, intonation and grammar. These problems hindered them from having
a fluency in speaking; thus, made them think that it was not easy to speak. I captured that still
many students find the difficulties
in learning English, especially speaking.
Teaching ESP is often described as a learner-based approach, which implies that one of the
fundamental responsibilities of the ESP practitioner is to investigate the gap between learners’ current
E
337
and target competencies (Belcher, 2012).
The diagnosis, referred to as needs analysis (NA), is a starting
point for further activities and involves thorough research into the objective and subjective needs of the
learner group and several other factors related to the planned ESP course, such as information about
the environment in which it is to be run.
Needs analysis determines to design a language course. For example, Hamp-Lyons (2001)
and Finney (2002) argue that a needs analysis has a vital role in the process of designing and
carrying out any language course, whether it be English for Specific Purposes (ESP) or general
English courses.
Likewise, Mazdayasna & Tahririan (2008) conducted a study with Iranian
students from the faculty of nursing and midwifery. The results revealed that students needed
to master the English proficiency because they needed to use not only Persian, but also English
sources to study their subjects. It can be concluded that English is needed not only for English
Language Education department students but also for all students in every major.
According to Sysoyev (2000), for many teachers, selection of teaching materials is based on
their availability. Taking materials from available sources is not continually suggested.
Sometimes it has limitation. Fauziah (2004) in her research focused
on material in teaching
speaking taken from Fun magazine found that the content of that magazine limited in the
vocabulary and materials instructions.
In selecting materials, teachers must understand about the syllabus that will be used in the
teaching and learning process. The criteria of syllabus must be considered carefully because the
content in the syllabus will be used for materials in the teaching and learning process. The
teachers may select materials from certain available sources if it
matches with teaching and
learning objectives. Emilianti (2013) found in her thesis about the use of internet sources for
taking ESP materials that it had some advantages; firstly, it made students found authentic
materials and, secondly, it could improve students’ motivation in learning ESP. Based on this
finding, the teachers are very suggested to find out more additional speaking material in internet
source to enrich the available material.
Following that, such learning materials which are really suitable with the needs of the
students are not always available. Marbuana (2007) found that the materials in “English for
Mathematic 2” was not closely relevant to the students’ needs because the content of this book
did not provide all the students’ need. Consequently, we cannot assure
all material books fulfill
students’ needs. There are still some books that are not relevant with students’ needs.
Abudhahir, et al. (2014) cite that materials development in ESP is very crucial. It should
take into consideration what the learners’ needs. Ideally, in developing the material, the teachers
should follow some aspects. Firstly, the teachers know that principle. Tomlinson (2003)