Of the republic of uzbekistan gulistan state university

3.2.Fixed and free Compounds in Morphology
The problems between fixed and free Compounds in Morphology
The last main “type” of morphology is compounding. Compounds are words built from more than one root (though they can also be built from derived words): if you find a word that contains more than one root in it, you are definitely dealing with a compound. Compounding differs from both derivation and inflection in that it doesn’t involve combinations of roots and affixes, but instead roots with roots. English is a language that builds compounds very freely—this is like other languages in the Germanic language family, like German and Dutch. For almost any two categories, you can find examples of compounds in English.
Noun-Noun compounds include:
doghouse
website
basketball
sunflower
moonlight
beekeeper
heartburn
spaceship
Adjective-Noun compounds include:
greenhouse
bluebird
Verb-Noun compounds include:
breakwater
baby-sit
Noun-Adjective compounds include:
trustworthy
watertight
Adjective-Adjective compounds include:
purebred
kind-hearted
blue-green
Noun-Verb compounds include:
browbeat
manhandle
sidestep
Adjective-Verb compounds include:
blacklist
These Compounds are free Compounds because The words are used separately and They have own meaning.Compounds are that words can always be used in one sentence .They can not separate each other and They are not used separately. formation rules for compounds is particularly prominent in frameworks that emphasize form-based properties of compounding. Rewrite rules for compounding have been proposed, generalizations over the selection of the input form (stem or word) and of linking elements, and rules for stress assignment. Compounds are generally thought of as consisting of two components, although these components may consist of more than one element themselves. For some types of compounds with three or more components, for example copulative compounds, a nonbinary structure has been proposed. The question of interpretation can be approached from two opposite perspectives. In a semasiological perspective, the meaning of a compound emerges from the interpretation of a given form. In an onomasiological perspective, the meaning precedes the formation in the sense that a form is selected to name a particular concept. The central question in the interpretation of compounds is how to determine the relationship between the two components. The range of possible interpretations can be constrained by the rules of compounding, by the semantics of the components, and by the context of use. A much-debated question concerns the relative importance of these factors.
he relationship between the different issues. As much ofCompounding in Morphology - Oxford
a criterion forcompoundhood.Phonological criteria offer a good example of the problems involved in a positive answer to). The final consonant of the stem in ) is realized as /t/ at the end of a word, but when it is followed by an affix starting with a vowel,whether inflectional as in or derivational as in resyllabification takes place and the final consonant is realized as /d/. Compounds as in do not have resyllabification, so that the final obstruent isdevoiced and realized as /t/.A criterion for recognizing compounds based on final obstruent devoicing would necessarily be language-specific.