Oxford university press how the br ain evolved language



Yüklə 2,9 Mb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə17/18
tarix06.06.2020
ölçüsü2,9 Mb.
#31814
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18
how the brain evolved language

teratos for “monster,” teratology is the clinical term 
for the study of birth defects. Testosterone is not clinically recognized as a teratogen. 
3.  The association between influenza and schizophrenia, though weak and poorly 
understood, has been corroborated, and a further association has been found between 
second-trimester influenza and adult unipolar depressive disorder (Machon et al. 
1997). 
4.  As my discussion should make clear and as Pinker (1994) explains at some 
length, genes do not have simple, unitary effects. Rather, they exert effects in combi­
nation with other genes, so there are probably hundreds of genes which could lay fair 
claim to being “grammar genes.” 
5.  Many researchers have hypothesized that perceptual saliency is a factor in learn­
ing inflectional morphology (e.g., Brown 1973; Clahsen 1989). 
6.  Bound, syllabic inflectional morphemes like -ing present an intermediate case 
between syllabic forms like of and nonsyllabic forms like -s. Common instances of such 
inflections (e.g., go/going) may be learned and performed “on the downbeat” as if they 
were uninflected irregular forms (cf. throw/threw or go/gonna). Even dysphasics may 
not exhibit difficulties with these forms in normal conversation. On wug tests, how­
ever, the nonsense forms cannot be previously learned, and here the dysphasics’ defi­
cit becomes especially apparent. 
7.  Dyslexia is not well understood, and the classification probably includes sev­
eral subtypes of different etiology. The historically dominant view, presented by 
Vellutino (1987), was that dyslexia is a higher cognitive disorder. Dyslexia is four to 
ten times more common in boys than girls, and there is reason to associate this with 
Geschwind’s finding of lesser cerebral asymmetry in boys. Such a subtype would not 
be inconsistent with adaptive grammar. However, as techniques for the measurement 
of fine eye movement have improved, there have been increasing reports of subtle 

NOTES  TO  PAGES 
178–190 
•  201 
fine motor disorders among dyslexics, although overshoots and “cerebellar braking 
problems” as described in the text are not always found. Raymond et al. (1988) found 
a positive correlation between cerebellar subtle dysfunction, dyslexia, and gaze in­
stability, and Biscaldi et al. (1994) even reported a subtype characterized by saccadic 
undershoot. See Aral et al. 1994 for a recent model of eye saccades involving the 
cerebellum. 
8.  Relatively few chemicals pass from the blood into the brain or from the brain 
into the blood. This fact is called the blood-brain barrier
9.  The collocation of “professors and brainwashers” is intended to alert the reader 
to the fact that this is very much a two-edged sword, as discussed further below. 
10.  Myelination is another often-postulated neurological cause of a critical pe­
riod for language (Long 1990). Adaptive grammar does not preclude a causal rela­
tionship between myelination (e.g, of the arcuate fasciculus) and language learning, 
but like lateralization, myelination is not species-specific, let alone language-specific, 
and it seems mostly to occur before the child begins to learn language. 
11.  See Deshmukh and Johnson 1997 for a recent study elaborating this distinc­
tion between neural cell death and apoptosis. 
12.  One should not conclude that a paralyzed child who cannot move her hand 
cannot develop cognition (although in such cases one should not be surprised to find 
aspects of cognition developing more slowly, either). The point is that proprioceptive 
feedback, of various origins, can form a “circular reaction,” which can be learned and 
remembered at long-term memory traces for later, volitional playback. 
13.  Long vocalizations like mamamamamamama probably do not have a specific 
meaning associated with them. They may be more words in the mind of the mommy 
than in the intentions of the baby. And, of course, any one child’s first word could 
also be bye-bye or No!—or the name of the family dog. But the early, if not absolutely 
first, occurrence of /mama/ is still far, far too widespread a phenomenon to be coin­
cidental. 
14.  I thank Elaine Shea for pointing this out to me. 
15.  In English, inflectional -s and -ed are usually not syllabic, so a technical account 
of the learning of inflectional and derivational morphology as an offbeat process must 
appeal to other child language morphophonemic processes like reduplication and 
diminutive affixation as well. 
16.  Braine (1971) introduced the notion of “pivot grammar” to describe the 
child’s early two-word utterances. Subsequent researchers were unable to generalize 
the notion to longer utterances, but it anticipated adaptive grammar’s implication of 
rhythmic dipoles in the syntactic organization of language. 
17.  Even in Chinese, whose writing system is often thought to bear little or no 
overt relationship to the spoken language, we find that Chinese readers process Chi­
nese characters primarily as sound (Chu-Chang and Loritz 1977). 

This page intentionally left blank 

REFERENCES
Ackley, D., Hinton, G., and Sejnowski, T. 1985. A learning algorithm for Boltzmann 
machines. Cognitive Science 9: 147–69. Reprinted in Anderson and Rosenfeld 1988. 
Aghajanian, G. K., and Marek, G. J. 1997. Serotonin induces excitatory postsynaptic 
potentials in apical dendrites of neocortical pyramidal cells. Neuropharmacology 36 
(4–5): 589–99. 
Allen, G. I., and Tsukahara, N. 1974. Cerebrocerebellar communication systems. Physi-
ological Review 54: 957–1006. 
ALPAC. 1966. Language and machines: computers in translation and linguistics. A report 
by the Automatic Language Processing Advisory Committee of the Division of 
Behavioral Science, National Academy of Science, National Research Council. 
Publication no. 1416. Washington: National Academy of Science/National Re­
search Council. 
Anderson, J. A., and Rosenfeld, E., eds. 1988. Neurocomputing: foundations of research. 
Cambridge: MIT Press. 
Anson, J. 1977. The Amityville Horror. New York: Prentice-Hall. 
Aral, K., Keller, E. L., and Edelman, J. A. 1994. Two-dimensional neural network model 
of the primate saccadic system. Neural Networks 7 (6/7): 1115–35. 
Aristotle. 1908. De partibus animalium. Trans. J. A. Smith and W. D. Ross. Oxford: 
Clarendon Press. 
Asimov, I. 1987. Beginnings: the story of origins—of mankind, life, the earth, the universe. 
New York: Walker. 
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press. 
Baker, C. L. (1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 
10: 533–81.
Barnes, S., Gutfreund, M., Satterly, D., and Wells, G. 1983. Characteristics of adult 
speech which predict children’s language development. Journal of Child Language 
10: 65–84
Barnsley, M. F. 1988. Fractals everywhere. New York: Academic Press. 
Bates, E., and MacWhinney, B. 1982. Functionalist approaches to grammar. In 
E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman, eds., Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cam­
bridge: Cambridge University Press. 
203 

204  • 
REFERENCES 
Békésy, G. von. 1960. Experiments in hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bellugi, U. 1967. “The acquisition of negation.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University.
Berko, J. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14: 150–77.
Bernstein-Ratner, N. 1987. The phonology of parent-child speech. In K. E. Nelson and
A. van Kleeck, eds., Children’s language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 
Berwick, R. C., and Weinberg, A. S. 1984. The grammatical basis of linguistic performance
Cambridge: MIT Press. 
Bickerton, D. 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma Press. 
Biscaldi, M., Fischer, B., and Aiple, F. 1994. Saccadic eye movements of dyslexic and 
normal reading children. Perception 23 (1): 45–64. 
Blanken, G., Dittmann, J., Grimm, H., Marshall, J. C., and Wallesch, C. W., eds. 1993. 
Linguistic disorders and pathologies. Berlin: de Gruyter. 
Bliss, T. V. P., and Lømo, T. 1973. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in 
the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant 
path. Journal of Physiology (London) 232: 331–56. 
Bloom, L. 1970. Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cam­
bridge: MIT Press. 
Bobrow, D. G., and Fraser, B. 1969. An augmented state transition network analysis 
procedure. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence 1: 557–67. 
Bohannon, J. N., MacWhinney, B., and Snow, C. E. 1990. Negative evidence revisited: 
beyond learnability or who has to prove what to whom? Developmental Psychology 
26: 221–26.
Bohannon, J. N., and Stanowicz, L. 1988. Adult responses to children’s language er­
rors: the issue of negative evidence. Developmental Psychology 24: 684–89. 
Bolinger, D. 1968. Aspects of language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World. 
Braine, M. D. S. 1971. On two types of models of the internalization of grammars. In 
D. I. Slobin, ed., The ontogenesis of grammar: a theoretical symposium. New York: Aca­
demic Press. 
Branigan, G. 1979. “Sequences of words as structured units.” Ph.D. diss., Boston Uni­
versity. 
Brodmann, K. 1909. Vergleichende Lokalisationlehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien 
dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Leipzig: J. A. Barth. 
Brown, R. 1973. A first language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 
Brown, R., and MacNeill, D. 1966. The “tip-of-the-tongue” phenomenon. Journal of 
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5: 325–37. 
Bullock, D., Fiala, J. C., and Grossberg, S. 1994. A neural model of timed response 
learning in the cerebellum. Neural Networks 7 (6/7): 1101–14. 
Cairns-Smith, A. G. 1985. Seven clues to the origin of life. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer­
sity Press. 
Campos, H., and Kemchinsky, P. 1997. Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: stud-
ies in honor of Carlos P. Otero. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 
Carpenter, G. A., and Grossberg, S. 1987. A massively parallel architecture for a self-
organizing neural pattern recognition machine. Computer Vision, Graphics, and 
Image Processing 37: 54–115. 
Carpenter, G. A., Grossberg, S., and Rosen, D. B. 1991. Fuzzy ART: fast stable learning 
and categorization of analog patterns by an adaptive resonance system. Neural 
Networks 4: 759–71. 
Chafe, W. 1970. Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago 
Press. 
Changeux, J.-P. 1985. Neuronal man: the biology of mind. New York: Pantheon Books. 

REFERENCES 
•  205 
Chao, Y.-R. 1948. Mandarin primer: an intensive course in spoken Chinese. Cambridge: 
Harvard University Press. 
———. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press. 
Chomsky, C. 1969. The acquisition of syntax in children from five to ten. Cambridge: MIT Press. 
Chomsky, N. 1959. Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal behaviorLanguage 35 (1): 26–57. 
———. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press. 
———. 1971. Review of B. F. Skinner’s Beyond freedom and dignity, “The case against 
Skinner.” New York Review of Books 18 (11): 18–24 (Dec. 29). Reprinted in F. W. 
Matson, ed., Without/within behaviorism and humanism. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 
———. 1972. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 
———. 1988. Language and politics. Montreal: Black Rose Books. 
———. 1993. Language and thought. Wakefield, RI: Moyer Bell. 
———. 1994. Bare phrase structure. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge. 
Reprinted in Campos and Kemchinsky 1997. 
———. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press. 
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harcourt Brace 
Jovanovich. 
Chu-Chang, M., and Loritz, D. 1977. Phonological encoding of Chinese ideographs 
in short-term memory. Language Learning 31: 78–103. 
Church, A. 1941. The calculi of lambda-conversion. London: Oxford University Press. 
Ciuffreda, K. J., Kenyon, R. V., and Stark, L. 1985. Eye movements during reading: 
further case reports. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 62 (12): 
844–52. 
Clahsen, H. 1989. The grammatical characterization of developmental dysphasia. Lin-
guistics 27: 897–920. 
Cohen, M. A., and Grossberg, S. 1986. Neural dynamics of speech and language cod­
ing: developmental programs, perceptual grouping, and competition for short 
term memory. Human Neurobiology 5: 1–22. 
Comrie, B. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. 2d ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 
Cook, W. A. 1989. Case grammar theory. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 
Copernicus, N. 1543. De revolutionibus orbium coelestium
Crick, F., and Asanuma, C. 1986. Certain aspects of the anatomy and physiology of the 
cerebral cortex. In McClelland and Rumelhart 1986. 
Cross, T. 1978. Mother’s speech and its association with rate of linguistic development 
in young children. In N. Waterson and C. Snow, eds., The development of communi-
cation. New York: Wiley. 
Crowder, R. G. 1970. The role of one’s own voice in immediate memory. Cognitive 
Psychology 1: 157–78. 
Curtiss, S. 1977. Genie: a psycholinguistic study of a modern-day “wild child.” New York: 
Academic Press. 
Cutler, A., ed. 1982. Slips of the tongue and language production. Chichester: Wiley. 
Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., and Damasio, A. R. 1996. A 
neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature 380: 499–505. 
Dawkins, R. 1986. The blind watchmaker. New York: W. W. Norton. 
Dawkins, R., and Krebs, J. R. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proceedings 
of the Royal Society of London, B, 205: 489–511. 
DeFelipe, J., and Jones, E. G. 1988. Cajal on the cerebral cortex. Oxford: Oxford Univer­
sity Press. 
DeLattre, P. 1965. Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German, and Span-
ish. The Hague: Mouton. 

206  • 
REFERENCES 
Dennett, D. 1995. Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon and Schuster. 
Derwing, B., and Baker, W. 1979. Recent research on the acquisition of English mor­
phology. In P. Fletcher and M. Garman, eds., Language acquisition. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press. 
Deshmukh, M., and Johnson, E. M., Jr. 1997. Programmed cell death in neurons: focus 
on the pathway of nerve growth factor deprivation–induced death of sympathetic 
neurons. Molecular Pharmacology 51 (6): 897–906. 
Dickerson, W. B. 1975. Predicting word stress: generative clues in an ESL context. TESL 
Studies 1: 38–52. 
Dickerson, W. B., and Finney, R. H. 1978. Spelling in TESL: stress cues to vowel qual­
ity. TESOL Quarterly 12: 163–76. 
Douglas, R. J., and Martin, K. A. C. 1990. Neocortex. In G. M. Shepherd, ed., The syn-
aptic organization of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press. 
Ebbinghaus, H. [1913]1964. Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. New York: 
Dover. 
Eccles, J. C. 1977. The understanding of the brain. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 
Edelman, G. 1987. Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books. 
Eden, G. F., Stein, J. F., and Wood, F. B. 1994. Differences in eye movements and read­
ing problems in dyslexic and normal children. Vision Research 34 (10): 1345–58. 
Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., and Vigorito, J. 1971. Speech perception in 
infants. Science 171: 303–6. 
Ellias, S. A., and Grossberg, S. 1975. Pattern formation, contrast control, and oscilla­
tions in the short term memory of shunting on-center off-surround networks. 
Biological Cybernetics 20: 69–98. 
Errington, M. C., and Bliss, T. V. P. 1982. Long-lasting potentiation of the perforant 
pathway in vivo is associated with increased glutamate release. Nature 297: 496–98. 
Ferguson, C. A., and Slobin, D. I. 1973. Studies of child language development. New York: 
Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 
Fernald, A., and Kuhl, P. K. 1987. Acoustic determinants of infant preference for 
motherese speech. Infant Behavior and Development 10 (3): 279–93. 
Fiala, J. C., Grossberg, S., and Bullock, D. 1996. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 
activation in cerebellar Purkinje cells as substrate for adaptive timing of the clas­
sically conditioned eye-blink response. Journal of Neuroscience 16 (11): 3760–74. 
Fillmore, C. 1968. The case for case. In E. Bach and R. Harms, eds., Universals in lin-
guistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 
Flege, J. E. 1988. The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. 
In H. Winitz, ed., Human communication and its disorders. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 
Fletcher, P., and Garman, M., eds. 1979. Language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge 
University Press. 
Fox, C. 1962. The structure of the cerebellar cortex. New York: Macmillan. 
Fraser, B. 1976. The verb-particle construction in English. New York: Academic Press. 
Fromkin, V. A., ed. 1973. Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton. 
———. 1977. Errors in linguistic performance. New York: Academic Press. 
Fromkin, V., and Rodman, R. 1974. An introduction to language. New York: Holt, 
Rinehart, and Winston. 
Gardner, R. A., and Gardner, B. T. 1969. Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. 
Science 165: 664–72. 
Garrett, M. 1993. Errors and their relevance for models of language production. In 
G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, J. Grimm, J. C. Marshall, and C. W. Wallesch, eds., Lin-
guistic disorders and pathologies. Berlin: de Gruyter. 

REFERENCES 
•  207 
Geschwind, N. 1972. Language and the brain. Scientific American 242 (April): 76–83. 
Geschwind, N., and Galaburda, A. M., eds. 1987. Cerebral lateralization: biological mecha-
nisms, associations, and pathology. Cambridge: MIT Press. 
Geschwind, N., and Levitsky, W. 1968. Human brain: left-right asymmetries in tempo­
ral speech region. Science 161: 186–187. 
Givón, T. 1993. English grammar: a function-based introduction. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 
Gold, E. 1965. Limiting recursion. Journal of Symbolic Logic 30: 1–19. 
———. 1967. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10: 447– 
74. 
Goldsmith, J. 1993. The last phonological rule: reflections on constraints and derivations. 
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
———. 1994. Grammar within a neural network. In S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan, and 
G. K. Iverson, eds., The reality of linguistic rules. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Gopnik, M. 1990. Genetic basis of grammar defect. Naure 346: 226. 
Gopnik, M., and Crago, M. B. 1991. Familial aggregation of a developmental language 
disorder. Cognition 39: 1–50. 
Granit, R. 1948. The off/on ratio of the isolated on-off elements in the mammalian 
eye. British Journal of Ophthalmology 32: 550–61. 
Gray, E. G. 1970. The fine structure of nerve. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 
36: 419.
Gray, J. S. 1975. Elements of a two-process theory of learning. London: Academic Press. 
———. 1982. The neuropsychiatry of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septo-
hippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
Gray, J. S., and Rawlins, J. N. P. 1986. Comparator and buffer memory: an attempt to 
integrate two models of hippocampal function. In R. L. Isaacson and K. Pribram, 
eds., The hippocampus, vol. 4. New York: Plenum. 
Greenberg, J. 1968. Some universals of grammar. In J. Greenberg, Universals of Lan-
guage. Cambridge: MIT Press. 
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan, eds., Syntax 
and semantics, vol. 3, Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. 
Grossberg, S. 1968. Some physiological and biochemical consequences of psychologi­
cal postulates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 60: 758–65. Reprinted 
in Grossberg 1982b. 
———. 1972a. Neural expectation: cerebellar and retinal analogs of cells fired by learn­
able or unlearned pattern classes. Kybernetik 10: 49–57. 
———. 1972b. A neural theory of punishment and avoidance. I: qualitative theory. 
Mathematical Biosciences 15: 39–67. 
———. 1972c. A neural theory of punishment and avoidance. II: Quantitative theory. 
Mathematical Biosciences 15: 253–85. Reprinted in Grossberg, 1982b. 
———. 1975. A neural model of attention, reinforcement, and discrimination learn­
ing. International Review of Neurobiology 18: 263–327. 
———. 1980. How does a brain build a cognitive code? Psychological Review 87: 1–51. 
Reprinted in Grossberg 1982b. 
———. 1982a. Processing of expected and unexpected events during conditioning 
and attention: a psychophysiological theory. Psychological Review 89: 529–72. 
———. 1982b. Studies of mind and brain: neural principles of learning, perception, develop-
ment, cognition and motor control. Dordrecht: Reidel. 
———. 1986. The adaptive self-organization of serial order in behavior: speech, lan­
guage, and motor control. In E. C. Schwab and H. C. Nusbaum, eds., Pattern rec-
ognition by humans and machines. Vol. 1. Orlando: Academic Press. 

208  • 
REFERENCES 
Grossberg, S., and Merrill, J. W. L. 1992. A neural network model of adaptively timed 
reinforcement learning and hippocampal dynamics. Cognitive Brain Research 3: 3–38. 
Grossberg, S., and Olson, S. J. 1994. Rules for the cortical map of ocular dominance 
and orientation columns. 
Yüklə 2,9 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin