Science and Education in Karakalpakstan. 2023 №2/1 ISSN 2181-9203 115
Psychologists (primarily L.I. Bojovich and his collaborators) in shaping the personality of a
child and a schoolchild not only correctly organize his activities, gain experience in correct
behavior, but also his behavior (they are known to show that the upbringing of correct motives (a
system of thoughts, feelings, goals) that encourage action is also an important point.
In other words, each qualitative structure of a person includes, therefore, a motive that
allows the student to have a positive attitude towards the corresponding behavior, and secondly, a
reinforced mode of behavior. Thus, according to scientists, personality is a unique combination of
behavioral motives and the corresponding forms of these motives. Behavior is a system of stable,
dominant (primary) motives, which some psychologists describe as a personality orientation. M.S.
Neimark researched the direction of schoolchildren and distinguished three main types of this
direction - collective, personal and work directions (direction to work, activity process, interest in
creative activity). The collective, personal types of direction should not have the same, correct
characteristics. In addition to the real team orientation, there is also the so-called "selfish group"
orientation, which recognizes only the interests of one community (group, class) while completely
ignoring the interests of other communities. Individual direction as a direction aimed at achieving
personal achievements is not always opposed to collective direction.[3.273-274 p].
According to J. Godfrey, personality is generally determined by both genetic and socio-
cultural influences. The concept of "personality" includes natural characteristics (gender,
temperament, etc.) in the process of active interactions with the social environment (family, school,
"significant others") and activities (play, knowledge, work). unites the set of social qualities
characteristic of the resulting individual.
Adolescents' communication with their parents and adults is mainly structured on the basis
of their sense of adulthood. They are very concerned about the limitations of their rights, resistance
and objections made by adults. But despite this, they need the support of adults in communication.
Joint activities help teenagers understand adults better. A teenager feels a great desire to share with
adults about the changes that are happening to him, the problems that concern him, but he will
never be the first to start it. A teenager strongly resents being treated like a child. Adolescent
communication is ultimately characterized by variability. Often they imitate the behavior of adults
they know and like.
We can experimentally study the personality and temperament of teenagers using the
Freiburg test questionnaire.
The equipment we need: methodology sample, answer sheet.
The Freiburg test questionnaire /FRI/ was used in practice in 1903 by researchers such as Y.
Farenberg, H. Zarg, R. Rampi. The test was first published in 1970, the second in 1973, and the
third edition in 1978.
This method is a multifactorial test that is suitable for diagnosing some characteristics of a
human personality. This is an important milestone for practical and scientific research purposes.
The questionnaire provides comprehensive information about the personality factor.
The test is intended for a wide range of subjects. There is also an abbreviated version of this
method. The test can be used individually or in groups. The time for completion depends on the
form of the questionnaire and it can last from 20 to 50 minutes. Instructions, questionnaire and
answer sheet are required for research. The FPI questionnaire consists of 12 dimensions. The
number of questions in the questionnaire is 114. Only question 1 is not specific to any dimension
(scale) because it is a survey. Scales I-XII are the main scales.
The test can be conducted individually or with a group of testers. Those who are being tested
should be placed in a position where they do not interfere with each other. The researcher briefly
explains the purpose of the research and the rules for working with the questionnaire. It is important