Science and Education in Karakalpakstan issn 2181-9203 Science Magazine chief editor

Science and Education in Karakalpakstan. 2023 №2/1 ISSN 2181-9203 
288 
The formation of the right to appeal decisions and actions (inaction) of the state executor in 
administrative courts is one of the new mechanisms for protecting the rights and legitimate interests 
of individuals and legal entities. In order to increase public confidence in the courts, judicial and 
legal reforms are being intensively carried out. Today, citizens' access to justice is improving. The 
main criterion of judicial and legal reform within the framework of the principle “New Uzbekistan–
new court" is the need for unconditional justice and the rule of law in our country. The guaranteed 
provision of human rights and interests on the basis of the principle of “For human dignity” is one 
of the priorities of the efforts undertaken in our country. Strict observance of the constitutional 
principle of the independence of the judiciary, which reliably protects human rights and freedoms, 
is the gradual democratization of the judicial system in our country and the ongoing reforms in the 
judicial and legal sphere. As well as the requirement of the period, we all know that the expansion 
of guarantees of reliable protection of citizens' rights and freedoms, increasing their access to 
justice, efficiency and quality of legal proceedings is the basis of ongoing reforms in the judicial 
and legal sphere. 
The new development strategy of Uzbekistan aims at systematic work to ensure human 
rights, strengthen accountability and openness of state bodies, as well as increase the activity of 
institutions[2.] civil society.
In accordance with the UN “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”[3], it is established 
that everyone has the right to effective restoration of their rights by competent national courts in 
case of violation of their fundamental rights established by the Constitution or law. 
As V. Lebedev emphasized, “a citizen must defend his rights in a dispute with the 
authorities in an open and understandable manner. After all, a person in such processes is 
undoubtedly a weak side. The task of the special procedures was to equate any obstacle of a citizen 
to a state institution through the court” [4.].
Of course, the developed and adopted regulatory legal acts reflect the need to implement the 
violated rights of every citizen and individual through the court.
It is known that in accordance with article 55 of the Constitution of the Republic of 
Uzbekistan[5.], everyone is guaranteed the right to judicial protection of their rights and freedoms, 
to appeal to the court against illegal decisions, actions and inaction of state bodies and other 
organizations, their officials. In turn, the establishment of administrative courts in our country, 
enshrined in our basic law, serves to ensure the effective exercise of these rights.
Up to this point, complaints about the actions (inaction) of state bodies and their officials 
were handled by civil and economic courts, and cases of administrative offenses were handled by 
criminal courts. 
Now cases of this category have been considered by newly created administrative courts. It 
is known that since June 1, 2017, the powers to consider administrative disputes arising from public 
law relations have been transferred to newly formed administrative courts. Disputes arising from 
public-law relations considered by administrative courts are legal disputes between citizens and 
legal entities, on the one hand, and state bodies and their officials, on the other hand, in which every 
person has the right to judicial protection of their rights and freedoms provided for by our 
Constitution, as well as actions state bodies and officials.(inaction) and appeal their decisions in 
court. 
With regard to this issue, first of all, in order to further strengthen citizens' confidence in 
justice, increase the prestige and influence of the judiciary, it is necessary to further improve the 
efficiency of the execution of judicial acts and acts of other bodies.
In this regard, there was a need to optimize the structure and powers of the Compulsory 
Enforcement Bureau under the Prosecutor General's Office, radically revise its working methods, 
strengthen interaction with interested ministries and departments, and local public authorities.

---