6
Two days later, Arthur received Frank Hurrell's answer to his letter.
It was characteristic of Frank that he should take such pains to reply
at length to the inquiry, and it was clear that he had lost none of his
old interest in odd personalities. He analysed Oliver Haddo's
character with the patience of a scientific man studying a new
species in which he is passionately concerned.
My dear Burdon:
It is singular that you should write just now to ask what I know of
Oliver Haddo, since by chance I met the other night at dinner at
Queen Anne's Gate a man who had much to tell me of him. I am
curious to know why he excites your interest, for I am sure his
peculiarities make him repugnant
to a person of your robust
common sense. I can with difficulty imagine two men less capable of
getting on together. Though I have not seen Haddo now for years, I
can tell you, in one way and another, a good deal about him. He
erred when he described me as his intimate friend. It is true that at
one time I saw much of him, but I never ceased cordially to dislike
him. He came up to Oxford from Eton with a reputation for athletics
and eccentricity. But you know that there is nothing that arouses the
ill-will of boys more than the latter, and he achieved an
unpopularity which was remarkable. It
turned out that he played
football admirably, and except for his rather scornful indolence he
might easily have got his blue. He sneered at the popular
enthusiasm for games, and was used to say that cricket was all very
well for boys but not fit for the pastime of men. (He was then
eighteen!) He talked grandiloquently of big-game shooting and of
mountain climbing as sports which
demanded courage and self-
reliance. He seemed, indeed, to like football, but he played it with a
brutal savagery which the other persons concerned naturally
resented. It became current opinion in other pursuits that he did not
play the game. He did nothing that was manifestly unfair, but was
capable of taking advantages which most people would have
thought mean; and he made defeat more hard to bear because he
exulted over the vanquished with the coarse banter that youths find
so difficult to endure.
What you would hardly believe is that, when he first came up, he
was a person of great physical attractions. He is now grown fat, but
in those days was extremely handsome. He reminded one of those
colossal statues of Apollo in which the
god is represented with a
feminine roundness and delicacy. He was very tall and had a
magnificent figure. It was so well-formed for his age that one might
have foretold his precious corpulence. He held himself with a
dashing erectness. Many called it an insolent swagger. His features
were regular and fine. He had a great quantity of curling hair, which
was worn long, with a sort of poetic grace: I am told that now he is
very bald; and I can imagine that this must be a great blow to him,
for he was always exceedingly vain. I remember a peculiarity of his
eyes, which could scarcely have been natural, but how it was
acquired I do not know. The eyes of most people converge upon the
object at which they look, but his remained parallel. It gave them a
singular
expression, as though he were scrutinising the inmost
thought of the person with whom he talked. He was notorious also
for the extravagance of his costume, but, unlike the aesthetes of that
day, who clothed themselves with artistic carelessness, he had a
taste for outrageous colours. Sometimes, by a queer freak, he
dressed himself at unseasonable moments with excessive formality.
He is the only undergraduate I have ever seen walk down the High
in a tall hat and a closely-buttoned frock-coat.
I have
told you he was very unpopular, but it was not an
unpopularity of the sort which ignores a man and leaves him chiefly
to his own society. Haddo knew everybody and was to be found in
the most unlikely places. Though people disliked him, they showed
a curious pleasure in his company, and he was probably entertained
more than any man in Oxford. I never saw him but he was
surrounded by a little crowd, who abused him behind his back, but
could not resist his fascination.
I often tried to analyse this, for I felt it as much as anyone, and
though I honestly could not bear him, I could never resist going to
see him whenever opportunity arose.
I suppose he offered the
charm of the unexpected to that mass of undergraduates who, for all
their matter-of-fact breeziness, are curiously alive to the romantic. It
was impossible to tell what he would do or say next, and you were
kept perpetually on the alert. He was certainly not witty, but he had
a coarse humour which excited the rather gross sense of the
ludicrous possessed by the young. He had a gift for caricature which
was really diverting, and an imperturbable assurance. He had also
an ingenious talent for profanity, and his inventiveness in this
Dostları ilə paylaş: