64
presence of a facilitator contributed to increased confidence, personal mastery and
ownership of the change process in a school staff. A change agent is someone who
influences others to adopt an innovation within an organisation (Metzler, Lund &
Gurvitch, 2008). Rodgers (1995) describes two processes involved in moving an
innovation into practice or thought: adoption or diffusion. Adoption occurs when one
or more individuals move along a path from first becoming aware of an innovation to
the regular usage of that idea or practice. Diffusion occurs as an innovation spreads
from introduction to wide usage among members of the same social system.
A social
system in the case of the current study, and from a social constructivist perspective,
could be defined as a group of teachers who share similar expertise and job
responsibilities, and apply them in similar settings i.e. their classrooms. Teachers
control diffusion, adoption must precede diffusion within a social system. According to
Hargreaves (1994),
if teachers don’t like change, don’t understand it, don’t think it is
practical or don’t
agree with it, then change will be implemented incompetently,
insincerely or not at all.
Fullan (2006) in writing about approaches to teacher change wrote about seven
premises which underpin change theory. The premises are those he deems necessary to
design strategies of instruction which elicit results. These premises are related to the
key features of effective professional development (
in italics
). They are as follows: i)
motivation (
active learning and coherence
); ii) a focus on results (
content
); iii) learning
in context (
active learning,
coherence and collective participation
); iv) changing
context (
coherence
); v) reflective action (
active learning and collective participation
);
vi) tri-level engagement (
collective participation and coherence
); vii)
persistence and
flexibility to stay the course (
duration
). To bring about change the instruction strategy
must motivate the teachers which may not be there initially but can be established over
time. Kabylov, (2006) notes that pressure is often necessary to encourage change
particularly among those who are less willing to change. He goes one step further to
say that support provides encouragement, motivation and nudging that many
practitioners require and this is needs based. This point is supported by the INTO
(2004a) and Guskey (2002b) when he says ‘both pressure and support are necessary
ingredients of success. Untapped competence can surface and flourish in this
environment’ and ‘support coupled with pressure is essential
for continuing educational
improvement’ (p. 388). This study aimed to develop teacher content and pedagogical
content knowledge, including providing resources and to bring about organisational
65
change where necessary. Learning in context, as well as a key feature, is also an
instructional strategy which informed the professional development programme in this
study. According to Elmore (2004), those involved in professional development need to
be cognisant that as learning occurs in context, the learning context
itself is in a constant
state of change. Randi and Corno (1997) contend that ‘change is not simply a matter of
implementing innovations’ (p. 1165) as without a clear understanding of how teachers
implement innovations or new practices it is unlikely that staff development can support
innovation at classroom level. For innovation to be successful they point to the ability
of teachers to be able to respond to the unique and varied context in which they teach.
Teachers’ beliefs, practices and experiential contexts intersect and interact and these are
personal experiences which they bring to teaching (Opfer, Pedder & Lavicza, 2011);
Teaching has to do in part at least with the formation of beliefs, and that means
that it has to do not simply with what we shall believe, but with how we shall
believe it. Teaching is
an activity which has to do, among other things, with the
modification and formation of belief systems. (Green, 1971, p. 48)
As the professional development takes place in context any changes required in the
contextual infrastructure or school organisational change can occur simultaneously.
These changes can help facilitate programme success and further motivate teachers.
The instructional strategy of a professional development programme needs to include
time and space for reflection as ‘people learn best through doing, reflection, inquiry,
evidence, more doing and so on’ (Fullan, 2006, p. 10). It is vital that teachers
experience regular positive feedback on their teaching, when implementing changes in
practice, this will reinforce their teaching and encourage sustained change and further
change (Guskey, 2002b). Although
not applicable to this study, tri-level engagement
which according to Fullan (2006) refers to connecting school, district and state as part
of the change strategy of the professional development programme. Finally as the
process of professional development facilitation can be a bumpy one, persistence and
flexibility are vital to ensure the programme is seen through to the end. The premises of
motivation, results, learning in context, context change, reflection
and persistence and
flexibility were premises which informed the professional development programme
design. As the purpose of the professional development programme was to elicit
change in teachers’ knowledge these premises (instructional strategies) aligned with
effective features of professional development and facilitated through a workable model
should impact on teachers’ teaching and bring about change in practice.
66
Guskey (2002b) identified the importance of introducing content that can fit in
with teachers’ existing practices based on teachers’ needs, while at the same time
allowing for adaptation and change to occur. Duffy (1993) found that although teachers
initially asked for prescriptive lessons in his study, over time the teachers showed
progress from modelling these prescribed practices to revising and inventing new
strategies. Prescribed practices provide a starting point for the
learning of new
knowledge and the development of new ideas for many teachers trying to meet the
needs of their pupils. Sparks (1986) found that teachers’ attitude toward innovation and
change was a person, the person who affected implementation – pointing to the
importance of the role of the facilitator of the professional development programme in
this study.
Dostları ilə paylaş: