Journal of Language and Cultural Education
, 2019, 7(2)
ISSN 1339-4584
14
the female students scored 3/5, 4/5 and 1/5 whereas the boy did not score at all
(the male student presented many grammatical, syntactical and lexical errors in
the pre-test) (see Figure 7).
Figure 5: Literacy skills improvement
Figure 6: The pre-test total score of the experimental group
• no grade
• student collaboration
• students are used to using the
computer
WRITING=EASIER
• use of blog's title and visuals
• easier to
scan and skim texts
READING=EASIER
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
PRE-TEST
TOTAL SCORE
EXPERIMENTA
L GROUP
Journal of Language and Cultural Education
, 2019, 7(2)
ISSN 1339-4584
15
Figure 7: The writing scores in the experimental group
In the control group, students performed well in the test. They scored 96%,
92% and 76% and in the writing part 3/5, 2/5 and only one student scored 1/4.
The student who scored ¼ has a cochlear implant and is hard of hearing. According
to Dostal and Wolbers (2014), hard of hearing students experience difficulties in
literacy skills because they do not have enough access to comprehensible input
(Figures 8 and 9).
Figure 8: The writing scores in the control group
Dostları ilə paylaş: