According to al-Baladhuri, the Prophet exacted it from the Magians of Hahr,
‘Umar took it from the Persians and ‘Uthman from the Berbers of Africa
8
.
The non-acceptance of jizyah from the Arab idolators by the Prophet seems
to be due to the fact that by that time the revelation regarding jizyah had not
been received. “Had any of the idolators remained outside the orbit of Islam
after the revelation about jizyah, the Prophet
would have accepted it from
them too and they would have become the dimma of the Islamic state
9
.”
It is noteworthy that the concept of dhimma and dhimmi emerged
only after the conquest of Makkah which took place in the year 8 A.H, Prior
to that the agreements entered into between the Prophet and the polytheists
were pacts of mutual help and cooperation. Hence they were neither the
protected people (ahl al-dhimma) nor any law of the Islamic state could be
applied to them
10
. This is warranted by the fact that the injunctions
regarding Jizya
11
were received by the Prophet only in the year 9 A.H. that
is to say, only after the conquest of Makkah
12
.
The imposition of jizyah on non-Muslim subjects of the Islamic
state has been differently interpreted by the Muslim jurists. The general
view that can fairly be guessed from the writings of the jurists is that jizyah
is imposed upon the non-Muslims as a badge of humiliation for their
unbelief or by way of mercy for the protection given
to them by the Islamic
state. Some consider it as a mark of punishment for their unbelief because
of their continuous stay in the Dar al-Islam which is a crime. Hence they
have no escape from being humiliated through the imposition of tax
13
.
Others contend that protection is given to non-Muslims with a view that they
may mix up with the Muslim population, adopt their good qualities and
ultimately embrace Islam
14
.
However, there was an economic motive
behind the imposition of Jizyah on non-Muslims, they insist.
111
Commenting upon the various theories of jizyah
by the classical
jurists, a scholar of the present age says that the Qur’anic verse IX:29
regarding jizyah has been understood in compact literal sense without taking
it in its true historical perspective. Perhaps it is due to this
misunderstanding, he adds,that jurists and exegetes consider jizyah as a
mark of degradation for the non-Muslims in Islam and infer corollaries
reflective of their humiliation
15
.
It appears as if these jurists “in making far-
fetched theories about the term saghirun (used in the Qur’an and upon which
they constructed their theories) have suggested such provisions as are
probably contrary to the facts and certainly opposed to the (very) ethics of
Islam
16
.”
A close study of
the early history of jizyah, particularly since its
imposition by the Prophet till late in the period of the Khulafa Rashidin will
reveal that it was an obligation through the payment of which non-Mulim
citizens of the Islamic state were exempted from rendering military service
and through which they were expected to pay allegiance to the political
authority of Islam. There is nothing to prove that it was imposed just to
humiliate the non-Muslims or to make them socially degraded. Had it been
so then women,
children, monks, unemployed, blind,sick and crippled would
never have been exempted from the payment of jizyah
17
. The categories of
persons mentioned above were not only exempted from jizyah but were also
given stipends from the state treasury as and when needy were detected
18
.
There are living examples of return of jizyah to non-Muslims by the Muslim
generals when they found themselves unable to protect them against their
enemies because of their engagements in the war.
19
It is to be observed that jizyah has been misunderstood as a
discriminatory tax, making as invidious distinction among
the citizens of the
Islamic state. This charge is perhaps based on ignorance of the Islamic
112
polity. “If it discriminated at all, it discriminated against Muslim protectrors
themselves who were compelled to pay higher taxes and also had the duty to
fight for the state: there is no compulsory military service for the non-
Muslims
20
. Jizyah was an obligation and non-Muslim citizens agreed to pay
it. Its payment entitled them to reap the fruit of almost all the rights and
privileges in the state and at par with the Muslim subjects. To put it into
other words, non-Muslims owed their loyalty to the state through the
payment of this tax or rendering military service and
enjoyed the rights and
unfolding of themselves which is the other side of that loyalty. With the
above preliminary discussion about the concept of dhimma and dhimmi, the
nature of jizyah and its payment we shall now discuss the rights and status of
non-Muslims in the Islamic state.
Dostları ilə paylaş: