81
The Questions on the Vocal Repertoire in Music
Education
Vladimír Richter
In the opinion of the music teaching community we notice the scepticism related
to the decline of general songfulness in children and adults, the decadence of liste-
ners’ taste and dismal state of music education. This dissatisfaction with the state of
music education has lasted in the professional
community for dozens of years, and
the feeling of scepticism usually grows with the age of teachers. School music edu-
cation has not long yielded satisfactory results in way of generating mass popularity
of classical music genres or a general growth of music interpretation activities. Being
aware of historical consequences, let’s now admit that desire for such goals is quite
idealized. New interest preferences, greatly infl uenced by the development of infor-
mation
technologies, come with new generations of pupils, an exceptional variety of
listeners’ liking of various music entertainment genres, kinds and styles affected by
the never-ending possibilities of recoding and distribution of music records is charac-
teristic of the present time. Besides the infl uence of school, the young generations are
also shaped by more and more powerful manipulation by
the show business industry
which gives not only young members of cultural and musical communication the
unequivocal role of passive consumers. No essential change in this trend was brought
either by e.g. so called new concept of music education implemented into schools
in the 1970’s, whose main idea was to activate the creativity in pupils in all aspects
of music education. The above given sceptical views are not new, but in the present
years, they may newly provoke the most basic fatal questions whether the meaning
of the general music education
at schools is still topical, or if it is worth existence at
all.
In this situation we need to revive arguments that clearly support arts education
at all stages of the school system, which have been collected by the professional
community and have been tried and tested for 200 years practical acts – publishing
of songbooks, music textbooks – and which was aptly formulated in the 20
th
century
on the basis of scientifi c refl ection in the professional literature. (Vladimír Helfert
wrote Basics of Music Education at General Schools – Základy hudební výchovy
na nehudebních školách in 1930.) (H
ELFERT
1956). The latest representative ‘the Re-
search in Using of Multimedia Technologies in Music Education’ carried out by the
Music Education Department of the Pedagogical Faculty
of Masaryk University of-
fers relevant information on the present state of school public opinions on general as
well as some sub-disciplinary problems of music education. Let’s take advantage of
this rare occasion and pay closer attention to the question of singing: regarding the
82
V
LADIMÍR
R
ICHTER
fact that singing is the main activity in music lessons and is gaining more and more
popularity among pupils, topics, which are discussed again and again among profes-
sionals include updating of singing repertoire, maintaining
or reducing the present
rate of representation of folk songs in songbooks, possibility of implementation of
popular music into the vocal education, defi ning criteria for alternative choice of
popular songs suitable for work with children. Before we list the topical opinions
introduced by the mentioned latest research, let’s look back into history, presuming
that the present state is infl uenced by the historical situation.
Over a hundred textbooks for music education and songbooks have been publis-
hed in the Czech language since the beginning of the nineteenth century.
Names of
such personalities that are famous even beyond the sphere of general music education
appear among authors of older textbooks for music education, e.g. Jakub Jan Ryba,
Josef Leopold Zvonař, Jan Nepomuk Škroup, Roman Nejedlý, Josef Cyril Sychra,
Bohuslav Jeremiáš. In the latter half of the 20
th
century similar authorship was part of
music-pedagogical scientifi c erudition: this situation is presented by the appearance
of such names as Jitka Snížková, Jan Budík, Ladislav Daniel, Radko Rajmon, Jaro-
slav Herden and others. All of the listed authors really cared
for the development of
general music education, and, besides their pursuit to cover basic topics of music the-
ory, they also always bore in mind the importance of rhythmical intonation practice,
which was realized in close connection with the cultivation of vocal skills.
Folk songs have always been the core material for music education. It could be
stated, without need for any perfect statistical data that they made about 50-60% of
song material. In connection with dates of origin of textbooks, besides the description
of music and text qualities, we can also fi nd motivation
notes of the patriotic char-
acter, and comments on important secondary effects of arts activities in education.
E.g. Ludvík Kozel in his Cvičebnice zpěvu pro školy měšťanské chlapecké i dívčí
(Songbook for girls’ and boys’ basic schools):
‘...for educational purposes, the clear
Dostları ilə paylaş: