The Under Appreciated Burden



Yüklə 3,04 Mb.
tarix16.02.2017
ölçüsü3,04 Mb.
#8536



The Under Appreciated Burden

  • The Under Appreciated Burden

  • Market Failure on Food Safety

  • The Limitations of Lawsuits

  • Government Regulatory Limits

  • What Can Do Done











Quantitative risk assessment (by design) does not coincide with society‘ values on risk

  • Quantitative risk assessment (by design) does not coincide with society‘ values on risk

  • Respecting society's risk perception / values

    • This is not probability neglect


Firms are under-rewarded in the marketplace for food safety

  • Firms are under-rewarded in the marketplace for food safety

    • Consumers cannot buy the level of safety they want
    • And consumers want to buy more safety (Harris et al. 2006)


The business of business is to pursue profits

  • The business of business is to pursue profits

  • Do not look to corporations for altruism

  • Not an ethical issue

  • Economic distortion creates distortion in risk perception



Competition is fierce

  • Competition is fierce

  • Cost-cutting vital

  • Companies must compete



Lawsuits provide important feedback to invest more in food safety

  • Lawsuits provide important feedback to invest more in food safety

    • When safety information is available after purchase
  • Works proportionate to proof of causation



What food or drink?

    • What food or drink?
    • Victim’s stool not tested
    • What bacteria or virus?
    • Apparent isolated case
    • No health department investigation


No proof of causation

  • No proof of causation

    • What food or drink?
    • Victim’s stool not tested
    • What bacteria or virus?
    • Apparent isolated case
    • No health department investigation
  • Unequal Power Between Victim and Manufacturer





Market inefficiency

  • Market inefficiency

    • classic situation where government controls necessary
  • Regulatory agencies face their own challenges

  • Sub-optimization: “Agency retrenchment, retreat, and slowness to act are rational patterns of human social and bureaucratic behavior.” Neal Fortin, The Hang-Up With HACCP: The Resistance to Translating Science into Food Safety Law, 58 FOOD AND DRUG L. J. 565-594, Vol. 58:4 (2003).



Education on food safety

  • Education on food safety

    • Classic cure for market failure based on inadequate information
    • Underutilized
  • Improve public health capacities

    • Public health a victim of its own success
  • Improve success of lawsuits!

    • Improve science on causation


Traceability

  • Traceability

    • Incentive for whole marketing chain to provide safer food
    • Opportunity to market food safety (eg: TESCO)
  • Citizens’ Food Protection Act

    • Private cause of action
      • Citizens not their bureaucratic surrogates are the public interest
    • Courts can ensure agency decisions reflect republican deliberation rather than an equilibrium of private interest [The Hang-Up With HACCP: The Resistance to Translating Science into Food Safety Law, 58 FOOD AND DRUG L. J. 565-594, Vol. 58:4 (2003)]










Neal Fortin

  • Neal Fortin

  • Professor and Director

  • Institute for Food Laws & Regulations

  • Michigan State University

  • fortinne@msu.edu

  • www.IFLR.msu.edu



Yüklə 3,04 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin