Torat ha-’elohut
, 290-315; Jacobs,
Hasidic Prayer
,
100-03; Etkes,
Ba‘al ha-Tanya
, 430-45.
50
LT
Shir ha-shirim
44d; see Ornet,
Ratso va-
shov, 182-3. See also:
MAHZ
5565
, i, 494-5, where the
essential change is defined as the cause of ecstasy, and MAHZ
5565
, i, 502-03, where the cause of
ecstasy is the renewal [
hidush
or
hithadshut
], inherent in penitence.
181
This is the advantage of setting times for Torah study by a tradesman, that it
is more in the nature of subjugation [
itkafya
] [of the evil side] than is [the
case of] those who dwell in tents [i.e. full-time scholars].
51
In the dynamic image of reality that emerges from Rashaz’s writings, ordinary
people, subject to the ongoing struggle with materiality, seem to be valued more than
the scholars and mystics who permanently dwell in lofty spiritual realms. The
gesture of the layperson who gives up some of his worldly interests in order to set
times for Torah study is tantamount to the subjugation of profanity to holiness,
termed in Habad “the subjugation of the evil side” [
itkafya de-sitra ahara
]. This is
not the case of the full-time scholars, who are constantly joined with the divine, and
who therefore do not need to make any effort to achieve the the state of subjugating
the evil side and reconnecting with God.
To summarize: setting times for Torah study means return-repentance, which
is tantamount to self-transformation and preparation to receive God’s revelation in
the words of Jewish law. Additionally, worship by means of setting times for Torah
study produces a more intense state of ecstasy [
hitpa‘alut
] and is more effective at
subjugating the evil side than the worship of full-time scholars by means of their
constant Torah study.
3.2 The theurgical significance of setting times for Torah study.
Rashaz’s notion of repentance is not confined to the spiritual life of the individual.
Alongside its personal aspect, repentance also has a theurgical significance: it effects
a restitution of order in the divine realm by way of restoring the order of the letters
constituting the divine name.
52
The personal and the theurgical aspects of repentance
51
TO 80c [Appendix 3].
52
“Let us begin with the
Zohar’
s esoteric interpretation of
teshuvah.
[
Teshuvah
] is
tashuv he
[“the
he
is to be returned”]. [The reconnection of] the latter
he
[to the preceding letter
vav
] is
teshuvah tata’ah
[“lower-level
teshuvah
”]; [the reconnection of] the former
he
[to the precedent letter
yud
] is
teshuvah
‘ila’ah
[“upper-level
teshuvah
”]. T3, 4:93b, based on Ziii 122a [Appendix 4]. The letters of the
Tetragrammaton refer to different aspects of the
sefirotic
tree:
yud
to
Hokhmah
,
he
to
Binah
,
vav
to
the six lower
sefirot
(
Hesed, Gevurah
,
Tif’eret
,
Netsah
,
Hod,
and
Yesod
), and the second
he
to the
182
converge in the commandment of setting times for Torah study. According to
Tanya
,
one must overcome one’s nature and join one’s emotional and intellectual attributes
to their counterparts within the Godhead. In particular, one’s mind and speech should
cleave to “God’s word, namely to
halakhah
.”
53
Overcoming one’s nature also means
achieving more than one was used to achieve in study, as the Midrash states: “If he
was accustomed to study one page [of Written Law], let him study two; if he was
accustomed to study one chapter [of Oral Law], let him study two.”
54
What Rashaz presents in
Tanya
in general terms as the obligation to increase
the regular measure of Torah study acquires much more concrete shape in one of his
discourses, where the “two chapters” are understood as referring to the two times
[
‘itim
] that one must set for studying Torah: “‘If one was accustomed to study one
chapter, let him study two’: this stands for setting times for Torah study: [two] times
indeed.”
55
Given that halakhic material constitutes the divine word, its study and
recitation bring about the re-unification of the soul, which is the “part of God
above
,
”
56
with the divine life-force [
hiyut
]. This is identified as a theurgical mode of
repentance [
teshuvah
], through the reconnection of the letter
he
with the rest of the
divine name. The theurgical process of restoring order in the divine name appears to
be available to practically everyone and is actually commanded of everyone. Thus an
activity, previously reserved for pneumatic figures immersed in mystical texts and
practices, appears here to be open to any literate person through the routine study of
normative halakhic literature.
57
This re-evaluation of the laymen’s study at fixed times may seem
paradoxical, given the prevalent image of Habad as an intellectualist Hasidic
lowest
sefirah
Malkhut
, identified with the divine speech. See T3, 4:94b. For a scholarly discussion of
this motif, see Foxbrunner,
Habad
, 133-36.
53
T3, 9:98b. See also T3, 8:98b, where Rashaz presents Torah study as the “upper-level”
teshuvah
,
following Ziii, 123a.
54
Vayikra rabah
,
25:1 [Appendix 5].
55
MAHZ
Ketuvim
,
i, 17; in a similar vein, Maharsha interprets the plural of
‘itim
as referring to
morning and evening study. See Eidels,
Hidushei agadot
18b, to
b
Shabat 31a.
56
Jb 31:2. On the soul as part of God, see for example T1, 2:6a, 35:44a; TO 16a; LT
Va-yikra
2d.
57
On the possibility of achieveing mystical union through halakhic study, see Loewenthal, “Finding
the Radiance,” 301-08.
183
school,
58
yet it is compatible with Rashaz’s broader enterprise, intended to empower
ba‘alei mitsvot
, the less scholarly and the supposedly lower class members of Jewish
society. In numerous places throughout his writings, Rashaz cites or refers to the
talmudic saying: “Where penitents [
ba‘alei teshuvah
] stand, not even the perfectly
righteous can stand” [
b
Berakhot 34b], and it is clear that
he saw in fixing times for
Torah study a mode of repentance. Setting times for study similarly serves as a
means of elevating the ordinary person above the righteous and the scholarly, and of
drawing attention to the more intense ecstasy [
hitpa‘alut
] and greater subjugation of
the evil side that the layperson can achieve.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |