Uzbekistan state world languages university translation faculty the english applied translation department

The theoretical significance of the study is that it deepens the understanding of the definition or theory of grammar structure, then learning its basic units and lexical, grammatical meanings as a consequence of given tasks.
The practical significance of the work lies in the fact that its results can be used in the learning grammar, basic units of grammatical structure are defined as well as given below.
The Structure of the given course paper consists of Introduction, two chapters which of each consists of two or more paragraphs, Conclusion followed by List of Literature used during the research.
Introduction is about the aim of the course paper, methods used in the course of explaining its topicality, novelty, scientific and practical value.
The Chapter one deals with the theoretical foundation of the grammar, learning grammatical structure and meanings. The first paragraph is brief information grammar and grammatical structure. The second paragraph is about theory related to units of grammatical structure.
The Chapter two reveals the study of lexical and grammatical meanings as a result of grammatical structure. The first paragraph of the second chapter is about analyzing some given lexical meanings. Also, l will give the information about grammatical meanings. The second paragraph is about the importance of grammatical structure and examples.
Bibliography directs us to the list of literature used in carrying out the given research of the course paper.


CHAPTER I. GRAMMATICAL STRUCTURE AND ITS FORMS

1. 
   Information about grammatical structure
   

The term linguistic use in this chapter incorporates both what language specialists call inflectional morphology and what they call language structure.
Morphology depicts the rules that administer the negligible important units of a dialect, called morphemes, and the way those negligible units are combined to form words. For illustration, English thing morphemes (e.g., dog) allow different postfix morphemes – called intonations – to be added to demonstrate majority (pooches), ownership (spelled dog's but articulated precisely like dogs), and both majority and ownership (spelled dogs' and once more articulated the same as dogs). Essentially, the verb bark is a morpheme that combines with inflectional postfixes to demonstrate linguistic assentation (spelled-s), past tense and past participle (-ed in both cases for bark), and dynamic perspective and gerundive shape (for which-ing serves a double part). Prefix morphemes (e.g., re- for verbs and non- for things) will not be treated here, as etymologists by and large consider them to be highlights of word formation (named derivational morphology) instead of highlights of the linguistic use of English. In hone, for English, language specialists for the most part limit the term inflectional morphology to the sorts of postfixes for things and verbs as of now exemplified here; to the different shapes of the individual pronouns (e.g., I, me, my, mine); and to comparative and superlative shapes of descriptive words (i.e., big, greater, greatest).
Grammatical structure in English dialect is essentially the course of action of words, expressions, and clauses in a sentence. Actually, this definition brings to intellect the parts of discourse in English dialect which is just like the building piece of grammar and sentence structure. It isn't fair sufficient to know what these parts of discourse are, it pays to know how they are used in communicating, how they are organized to make expressions, language structure and sentence structures that can proficiently make sense to the peruser or audience. So the structure and organization of a sentence is what linguistic structures in English dialect is all approximately, and it is enormously subordinate on what is called the “syntax or syntactic structure”. The grammatical structure in English language requests that words and phrases are organized in a certain way to form a well-formed sentence; that's what syntactic structure is all almost.
Grammatical structure is commonly expected to exist in speakers' minds. In any case, grammatical structure is additionally straightforwardly included in social interaction in dialect utilize, and dialect utilize is central to bookkeeping for dialect procurement, dialect variation and dialect alter. Within the more energetic prepare of dialect securing and dialect alter, utilitarian variables have been contended to play a part. In both dialect procurement and dialect alter, it has been contended that competing inspirations among useful standards play a major part.
The concept of competing inspirations is that (functional) principles may come into struggle such that there's no linguistic framework that fulfills all of the utilitarian principles. As a result, alter happens over time in securing and within the history of a dialect, and the dialects of the world display basic differing qualities even though their speakers' phonetic behavior adjusts to the same useful standards. (Competing inspiration models don't presuppose that the competing principles are utilitarian, and in truth competing inspiration models are presently utilized by numerous formalists; see underneath).
The foremost common and commonly advertised example of competing inspirations is that between economy and iconicity (see Linguistics: Iconicity). 
Economy is the rule that a speaker employments the slightest exertion fundamental to specific himself or herself. For illustration, English clears out the particular number of things unexpressed: book-ϕ vs. book-s. Economy is considered to be a speaker-oriented utilitarian rule: its impact on dialect is for the advantage of the speaker. Iconicity is, in portion, the guideline that all of the important parts of the meaning passed on are in reality passed on by linguistic components within the articulation (words, intonations, etc.). For case, in a few dialects, both the solitary and the plural of a thing are communicated by overt suffixes. This perspective of iconicity is considered to be hearer-oriented: any viewpoint of meaning cleared out out by the speaker may not be recoverable by the listener. Economy and iconicity compete with each other: a phonetic expression that's conservative will not be famous (since it clears out a few components of meaning unexpressed), and an expression that's notorious will not be temperate (since certain components of meaning are not cleared out unexpressed). Subsequently, over dialects, there's differences within the expression of the category of number, and dialects alter from one shape of expression of number to another over time.
Maybe the most excellent known competing inspirations demonstrate in dialect procurement is the competition demonstrate of E. Bates and B. MacWhinney (1989). In dialect alter, a number of linguists have put forward competing inspirations models, in particular J. Haiman (1985).
More as of late, a few functionalist language specialists (P. Container, J. Haiman, and J. Bybee) have emphasized the energetic character of dialect in conventional utilize, and have contended that a speaker's linguistic information ought to not be considered to be as inactive and permanent as is more often than not accepted. They contend that a speaker's syntactic information isn't a firmly coordinates framework, but or maybe a more freely organized stock of conventionalized schedules that have developed through dialect utilize. The experimental inquire about of the functionalist etymologists who advocate this see has centered on the part of recurrence of utilize on the entrenchment of grammatical knowledge, and on inductive models of abstracting syntactic information from presentation to dialect utilize, both in procurement and in grown-up utilization. There have been a number of considers of inflectional ideal models of words that back the speculation that recurrence of utilize impacts syntactic representation; in any case, thinks about of syntactic development in this approach are in their earliest stages.
Grammatical structure and utilization traditions of any dialect are connected in endless ways with the social, social, and chronicled involvement of its speakers. Drawing on cases from numerous dialects, this article illustrates the nature and extend of these joins. It highlights the culture-specific nature of numerous words, counting terms for social categories, feelings, and esteem concepts. It clarifies the idea of social key words and the noteworthiness of lexical elaboration. Within the space of language structure, the article appears how syntactic developments and stamping may express and reflect culture-related implications. Within the domain of dialect in utilize, themes considered incorporate talk particles and contributes, phonetic routines, speech genres and discourse styles, and broader talk styles, illustrating assorted ways in which dialect utilize can be related to varying social standards, values, and states of mind.
In English grammar, sentence structure is the course of action of words, phrases, and clauses in a sentence. The grammatical function or meaning of a sentence is subordinate on this auxiliary organization, which is additionally called sentence structure or syntactic structure. In conventional linguistic use, the four fundamental sorts of sentence structures are the basic sentence, the compound sentence, the complex sentence, and the compound-complex sentence.
The foremost common word arrange in English sentences is Subject-Verb-Object (SVO). When perusing a sentence, we for the most part anticipate the primary thing to be the subject and the moment thing to be the protest. This desire (which isn't continuously satisfied) is known in phonetics as the "canonical sentence procedure."
One of the primary lessons learned by the understudy of dialect or linguistics is that there's more to language than a straightforward lexicon list. To memorize a dialect, we must too learn its standards of sentence structure, and a linguist who is considering a language will for the most part be more curious about the basic standards than within the lexicon per se."—Margaret J. Speas
"Sentence structure may eventually be composed of numerous parts, but keep in mind that the establishment of each sentence is the subject and the predicate. The subject may be a word or a bunch of words that capacities as a thing; the predicate is at slightest a verb and conceivably incorporates objects and modifiers of the verb."- Lara Robbins

2.