Welcome to Mr Aslanov’s Lessons
QUESTION-TYPE BASED TESTS
Aslanovs_Lessons
seized by a “compulsion to narrate": a
deep-seated need to shape, order and explain what they do not
understand. Chronic confabulators are often highly inventive at the verbal level, jamming together words in
nonsensical but suggestive ways: one patient, when asked what happened to Queen Marie Antoinette of
France, answered that she had been“ suicided" by her family. In a sense, these patients are
like novelists,
as described by Henry James: people on whom "nothing is wasted". Unlike writers, however, they have little
or no control over their own material.
D. The wider significance of this condition is what it tells us about ourselves. Evidently, there is a gushing
river of verbal creativity in the
normal human mind, from which both artistic invention and lying are drawn.
We are born storytellers, spinning, narrative out of our experience and imagination, straining against the
leash that keeps us tethered to reality. This is a wonderful thing; it is what gives us out ability to conceive of
alternative futures and different worlds. And it helps us to understand our own lives through the entertaining
stories of others. But it can lead us into trouble, particularly when we try to persuade others that our
inventions are real. Most of the time, as our stories bubble
up to consciousness, we exercise our cerebral
censors, controlling which stories we tell, and to whom. Yet people lie for all sorts of reasons, including the
fact that confabulating can be dangerously fun.
E. During a now-famous libel case in 1996, Jonathan Aitken, a
former cabinet minister, recounted a tale to
illustrate the horrors he endured after a national newspaper tainted his name. The case, which stretched on
for more than two
years, involved a series of claims made by the Guardian about Aitken's relationships with
Saudi arms dealers, including meetings he allegedly held with them on a trip to Paris while he was a
government minister. Whitt amazed many in hindsight was the sheer superfluity of the
lies Aitken told
during his testimony. Aitken’s case collapsed in June 1997, when the defence finally found indisputable
evidence about his Paris trip. Until then, Aitken's charm, fluency and flair for theatrical displays of sincerity
looked as if they might bring him victory, they revealed that not only was Aitken’s daughter not with him
that day (when he was indeed doorstepped), but also that the minister had simply got into his car and drove
off, with no vehicle in pursuit.
F. Of course, unlike Aitken, actors, playwrights and novelists are not literally attempting to deceive us,
because the rules are laid out in advance: come to the theatre, or open this book, and we'll lie to you. Perhaps
this is why we fell it necessary to invent art in the first place: as a safe space into which our lies can be
corralled, and channeled into something socially useful. Given the universal compulsion to tell stories, art is
the best way to refine and enjoy the particularly outlandish or insight till ones. But that is not the whole
story. The key way in which artistic “lies" differ from normal lies, and from the "honest lying” of chronic
confabulators, is that they have a meaning and resonance beyond their creator. The
liar lies on behalf of
himself; the artist tell lies on behalf of everyone. If writers have a compulsion to narrate, they compel
themselves to find insights about the human condition. Mario Vargas Llosa has written that novels “express
a curious truth that can only he expressed in a furtive and veiled fashion, masquerading as what it is not.”
Art is a lie whose secret ingredient is truth.
http://fayllar.org