What is Plagiarism



Yüklə 168,5 Kb.
səhifə1/32
tarix28.12.2021
ölçüsü168,5 Kb.
#17099
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   32

What is Plagiarism

Many people think of plagiarism as copying another’s work, or borrowing someone else’s original ideas. But terms like “copying” and “borrowing” can disguise the seriousness of the offense:


According to the Merriam-Webster OnLine Dictionary, to “plagiarize” means



  1. to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own

  2. to use (another's production) without crediting the source

  3. to commit literary theft

  4. to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.

In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else’s work and lying about it afterward.


But can words and ideas really be stolen?
According to U.S. law, the answer is yes. In the United States and

many other countries, the expression of original ideas is considered



intellectual property, and is protected by copyright laws, just like original

inventions. Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection

as long as they are recorded in some media (such as a book or a computer file).


All of the following are considered plagiarism:


  • turning in someone else’s work as your own

  • copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit

  • failing to put a quotation in quotation marks

  • giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation

  • changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit

  • copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on “fair use” rules)

Attention! Changing the words of an original source is not sufficient to prevent plagiarism. If you have retained the essential idea of an original source, and have not cited it, then no matter how drastically you may have altered its context or presentation, you have still plagiarized


Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed, and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source, is usually enough to prevent plagiarism.

Types of Plagiarism
Anyone who has written or graded a paper knows that plagiarism is not always a black-and-white issue. The boundary between plagiarism and research is often unclear. Learning to recognize the various forms of plagiarism, especially the more ambiguous ones, is an important step in the fight to prevent it.
I. Sources not cited


  1. “The Ghost Writer”

The writer turns in another’s work, word-for-word, as his or her own.




  1. “The Photocopy”

The writer copies significant portions of text straight from a single source, without alteration.




  1. “The Potluck Paper”

The writer tries to disguise plagiarism by copying from several different sources, tweaking the sentences to make them fit together while retaining most of the original phrasing.




  1. “The Poor Disguise”

Although the writer has retained the essential content of the source, he or she has altered the paper’s appearance slightly by changing key words and phrases.




  1. “The Labor of Laziness”

The writer takes the time to paraphrase most of the paper from other sources and make it all fit together, instead of spending the same effort on original work.




  1. “The Self-Stealer”

The writer “borrows” generously from his or her previous work, violating policies concerning the expectation of originality adopted by most academic institutions.


II. Sources Cited (but still plagiarized!)


    1. “The Forgotten Footnote”

The writer mentions an author’s name for a source, but neglects to include specific information on the location of the material referenced. This often masks other forms of plagiarism by obscuring source locations.




    1. “The Misinformer”

The writer provides inaccurate information regarding the sources, making it impossible to find them.




    1. “The Too-Perfect Paraphrase”

The writer properly cites a source, but neglects to put in quotation marks text that has been copied word-for-word, or close to it. Although attributing the basic ideas to the source, the writer is falsely claiming original presentation and interpretation of the information.




    1. “The Resourceful Citer”

The writer properly cites all sources, paraphrasing and using quotations appropriately. The catch? The paper contains almost no original work! It is sometimes difficult to spot this form of plagiarism because it looks like any other well-researched document.





    1. “The Perfect Crime”

Well, we all know it doesn’t exist. In this case, the writer properly quotes and cites sources in some places, but goes on to paraphrase other arguments from those sources without citation. This way, the writer tries to pass off the paraphrased material as his or her own analysis of the cited material.



FAQ

Yüklə 168,5 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   32




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin