Article in Ñemit ỹ RÃ Revista Multilingüe de Lengüa Sociedad y Educación · January 021 doi: 10. 47133/nemityra010210 citations reads 693 authors

Reading Apps 
 
Reading Comprehension 
and 
English Reading Test 
scored similarly in curriculum 
connection, performance, user-friendliness, and feedback. However, the analysis showed 
that 
English Reading Test 
outscored 
Reading Comprehension 
in differentiation and appeal 
(see Table 3). Following is a more thorough summary of the features each app provides and 
the scores the apps obtained. 
Reading Comprehension
. 
Developed by Paprika Studio, this app offers the meaning 
of vocabulary words, reading and vocabulary practices, and test sessions. These elements 
made this app score four in curriculum connection, authenticity, performance, and user- 

---

ISSN 2707-1642
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
106 
 
friendliness. Conversely, the app scored low in differentiation and sharing because the 
settings cannot be altered and learners’ progress is not saved. Finally, the app received a 
score of two in feedback and appeal: looks & sounds (see Fig. 5) since feedback is limited to 
correct or incorrect scoring. Thus, its mean score resulted in 2.75 out of 4. 
Fig. 5. Reading Comprehension by Paprika Studio screenshots 
English Reading Test
. 
Developed by quiz world, this app offers quizzes, flashcards, 
grammar lessons, chat rooms among other features. This app received the maximum score in 
curriculum connection, performance, user friendliness, and appeal: looks & sounds. It is 
strongly connected to the reading skill, fast and reliable, very easy to use, and it has 
outstanding sound and graphics. In the dimensions of authenticity and differentiation it was 
scored three since even though the learner can experience authentic learning in some aspects 
of the app, there is more than one amount of flexibility to meet students need. Its mean score 
resulted in 3 out of 4. 
Fig. 6. English Reading Test by quiz world screenshots.