Fig 3 (a) Original author responses to the question ‘Have your findings been used as a basis for
conservation action?’ (b) Adjustment of findings into a binary response variable. (n=474)
4.2.1 ‘Yes’ responses
Of the 270 ‘yes’ responses, 56% of findings had been used in both practical implementation
(table 2) and policy (table 3). 27% stated that their findings had been used in practical
implementation of conservation action only, and 11% stated that their findings had been
incorporated into policy only. A further 6% did not provide any response. 59% of respondents
qualified their answer in an open-ended response to provide evidence for the use of their
findings (Box1; Box 2).
32
Table 2. Forms of practical implementation of research findings (n=224)
Type of conservation action implementation
% response
Incorporation into an NGO/Govt action plan (implemented)
Implementation by ‘on the ground’ practitioner
Creation/design of a PA
Increased participation of local stakeholders
Increased enforcement of conservation measures
Use in reintroduction/translocation programme
Elimination/reduction of a specific threat
52 %
51 %
38 %
38 %
34 %
23 %
22%
Box 1. Examples of practical implementation of research findings from survey responses
1. A study by Rodriguez et al (2001) identified that an estuarine mollusc was threatened by
habitat loss, which had not previously been known to be the case. This resulted in altered
management practices to divert the Colorado River back into its former area.
2. Research by Roemer et al (2001) identified that feral pigs (indirectly) and golden eagles
(directly) were causing the decline of island foxes on the Californian Channel Islands but
this was not taken seriously by the manager until the research had been published in two
journals. The management authorities subsequently began to remove these threats to the
species and initiated a captive breeding programme.
3. A study by Morrogh-Bernard et al (2003) identified the largest contiguous orang-utan
population in Borneo and led to the creation of a National Park in an area that was
formerly land for logging, and is now widely recognised as an important area for
orangutans.
4. A study identifying the important habitat for the critically endangered pale-headed brush
finch in Ecuador (Oppel et al, 2004) led to the expansion of protected areas, better habitat
management, and the removal of a threatening species. Subsequent monitoring has
indicated an 80% increase of the population.
5. New protected areas for snow leopards were created in consideration of the habitat and
range use requirements identified by McCarthy et al (2005)
6. Sikhote-Alin reserve focused poaching patrols on roads and some road closures in
response to the findings of Kerley et al (2002) that there is higher survival of Amur tigers
in roadless areas
|