7.3.1.Wriggling Fish
The following poem condenses the story of Wriggling Fish yet also highlights the opposition that
led to movement. There is a wish not to explain the poem too much for to me it appears self
explanatory but for this study none of the poems can be left only as performance pieces (Holman
Jones 2005), although they do stand on their own. There is a need to demonstrate the presence or
absence of the constructs as well as including the participants‟ feedback to demonstrate
relevance to the study.
WRIGGLING FISH
It took a long time
To discover where I was -
Lost in no-man‟s land
Repeating the games of generations.
A fish out of water
Floundering around
Being everybody else‟s fish
But not my own.
I loathed the cold counsellor
I disagreed with colleagues
I squirmed with resistance.
Rigid with neck pain
Trapped even by my body
Wriggling was all that was left.
But being so firmly hooked
Made seeing where I was unavoidable.
Searching for release
Brought my hated selves into focus;
The worst mother
184
The angry child
The rejected adult
Fought until
Bruised and battered
Gut wrenching tears
Let feeling speak.
With no energy left
I shot down my barriers
And within a tight circle of purity
I saw my golden nan ascending
Into me.
The roots of ancestors
Bubbled up the gift of integration
So that even the black plastic bags
Of death and hate
Could be undone.
Restrictions had kept me wriggling all my life
But this awful process
Lifted the stone from across my throat
And opened a clean, white, blank page
To give me the freedom to speak myself
To become myself
To swim off into the future
Grounded in the water of my own rebirth.
At the start of her counselling Wriggling Fish experienced the boundaries as being very tight and
the counsellor as cold, yet she seemed to feel caught by her and stayed with the relationship even
though it felt restrictive. In being caught she was perhaps stuck, hooked, uncontained-unfree and
unable to move emotionally, or like Beauty she was being a good girl doing what was expected
of her. But it is from this uncontained-unfree place that she is able to look around. Here she can
see where she is and begin the process of changing herself, by letting herself off the hook - to
free herself. She agreed with the construct uncontained-unfree when she felt stuck and wrote:
“Although I don‟t like this construct - it was how I was feeling - it was extremely
powerful - It brings to mind two opponents in a boxing ring - sizing each other up
before the fight”(WF).
185
The constructs seemed to make sense to Wriggling Fish in that they fitted with her feelings at the
time. Initially she thought that they did not fit but after taking the time to weigh them against the
criteria of the constructs she felt that they all fitted.
The counselling seemed to enable Wriggling Fish to see that she was caught in cycles of
previously learned behaviour. Realizing her need to change she both fights against change and
fights for it, demonstrating the opposition/polarity within her. The tension created by opposing
desires seems to enable emotional movement. Over two weeks she feels huge anger towards the
counsellor and feels rebuffed for asking if the counsellor has a cold. However this enables her to
express her anger (be the Beast and a new self rather than denying her angry self) and following
this the relationship begins to change. It seems that she both fought against containment by the
counsellor and also fought against containing so much angry emotion. She agreed with the
construct fighting containment-freedom and wrote:
“It had not been appropriate for „a good girl‟ to show anger before - and I liked to be
liked - and anger would stop this - I felt I wasn‟t „liked‟ by the counsellor - so doing
anger didn‟t matter so much. However, it was very hard to express - but once started
it felt an immense relief” (WF).
This expression of anger enables a shift in the counselling relationship. Wriggling Fish felt that
the counsellor stayed with the anger and she began to feel safe with her which moved her into the
construct of desiring containment-freedom. This seems to demonstrate how the tension enabled
movement. Feeling safe enabled her to risk exploring more of her selves and she describes
feeling safe as essential for her counselling process to be effective.
Feeling where she is in what she describes as no man‟s land seems to create the desire to shift
internally. Her sense of wriggling and floundering suggested the construct of being
186
overcontained-overfree, bound by the opinions of „generations‟, and also by the counselling
course she was attending. Like Beauty she does not feel free enough to be herself. She is
confused and no longer sure about becoming a counsellor. There is a sense of her being out of
control, in turmoil, and this seems to affect her body as she gets a stiff neck and has trouble
moving. But the embodied pain in her neck seems to enable her to think about what is happening
to her and brings her emotional anguish into consciousness through writing in the journal.
Death was very much part of Wriggling Fish‟s journal, including the deaths of friends in her
external life. However there was a death that was hard to recognize. I did not know what the
„black plastic bags‟ were, or what they represented when writing the analysis. However I sensed
the enormity of feeling around them, a kind of horror and suggested the construct towards
containment-freedom. It seemed that she was beginning to contain her own feelings even though
I was not certain what this was about. Wriggling Fish confirmed the importance of this entry as
she was referring to giving away her late husband‟s clothes after his funeral. There was a real
sense of her having the freedom to contain her own emotions. This also confirms the way the
participants were asked to write the journal for an immense amount of feeling was put into a few
words. There was also a sense of appreciation in the participant that I had understood the
enormity of feeling hidden in the work.
The process of movement is slow as she moves back and forth between wanting to change,
fearing change and therefore not wanting to change. Yet the very aspects that seemed to hold her
back also released her for it is her „nan‟, one of the „ancestors‟, who enables movement. This
internalised part of herself begins the process of her seeing herself differently. She is ascending
187
as opposed to being hooked. She appears to be fed by her internal objects (Harris Williams
1997), her selves. Rather than keeping her caught as she was at the start of the journal, by
repeating the games of generations, now the roots of ancestors enable integration of different
selves. Through reflexive writing she begins her process of transformation. This fits with Jung‟s
(1969) suggestion of inner polarities working together. The part of her that was initially hooked
was beginning to work with the part that was ascending as opposed to fighting against each
other.
She is able to look at selves that she hated and in the process of accepting them she appears to let
them change demonstrating the unity of Beauty and the Beast. It seems a painful process to let go
of herself, whether as a wriggling fish or as a hated mother. Although these selves may always
be part of her, they no longer control her and she seems able to change her attitude towards them.
The loss of the power of such selves that were known is like a death, a letting go of a part of the
self, and risking being different in the sense of moving forwards, rather than remaining as she
had always been. This „awful‟ counselling process was painful but enabled her to find a freer self
who has a voice of her own as opposed to voices of previous generations. Writing out her
anguish in metaphors enables her to find meaning in her history and use other selves, like nan to
enable change.
This new found freedom seemed to enable Wriggling Fish to give honest feedback. Although she
felt that the categories fitted, she did not always feel that the analysis was correct and she wrote
comments on what it felt like when it was wrong:
“I felt as though my counsellor was being supported and I felt hurt and left out…..but
188
when I felt that it had been interpreted correctly - it gave me a warm glow of being
understood”(WF).
She did agree with the majority of the analysis but understanding what it was like for her when
the analysis felt wrong feels important, reminding me of the sensitivity of the experiences being
analysed. This perhaps demonstrates the importance of the length of time the journals were
recorded over as this gave the opportunity for me to get to know the participants within the
context of their journals and to analyse the narratives from more than one perspective.
For Wriggling Fish the least helpful part of the research was the time needed to undertake the
feedback but she also thought this may have been influenced by the fact that she was looking
back at what had been a very painful time for her. The most helpful aspect was being able to see
how her boundaries had changed:
“from a feeling that I wriggled within the confines of too strong a boundary - to
feeling them too loose and not safe - to eventually it becoming a „good fit‟- safe,
comfortable and workable. It feels as if I was going through painful growing years of
rebellious teenage to now a feeling of growing up” (WF).
Another of the participants felt that she was also growing up through her counselling so this is
perhaps a common theme along with personal learning and searching for themselves.
The main impact of taking part in the research for Wriggling Fish was the reflexivity that
keeping the journal gave her between weekly counselling sessions. She found this helped the
work on herself continue during each week and felt this may have moved her more quickly than
if she had not being doing it. The impact of reading the analysis has stayed with her and brought
up a feeling of protection for her journal.
189
On whether the notions of containment-freedom as a polarity has stayed with her in any way she
wrote:
“I still find it hard to get my head around - but as I read the different constructs - I
could see what reluctant clients are battling with and in fact how as a counsellor, it
can sometimes feel like a battle for me too …. So I found that really helpful”(WF).
It is interesting that the research appears to have influenced her counselling practice. She also
said that the original talk I gave at her training establishment had stayed with her in that she had
not expected so many variations in the understanding of one word - containment. This helped her
to realize how easy it is not to be understood as the client because the meaning of a word can be
so different for any two people.
She liked the way she was asked to keep the journal, particularly the short phrase on each line as:
“It made me condense my feelings and experience, usually very difficult for me, - it
felt punchier - more to the point - concentrated - but as I needed to be a good girl
then - I noticed that I wanted to fill in most of the page - or could it be that I try to fill
life and not leave too many spaces”(WF).
This feedback demonstrates that the way the journals were written had the desired effect both for
the participant and for the research. But what I really appreciate is that even as she writes the
feedback Wriggling Fish is still working on herself as she wonders about why she had to fill
almost every page and she is open enough to have more than one perspective of this. It also
suggests that part of her was being the „good girl‟ Beauty doing what she imagined was expected
of her.
In response to the poem Wriggling Fish wrote:
“It feels very strange to read about counselling that happened in what seems like
another world now …it somehow swirls with what I experience now …like mixing a
pot of paint….I have just read the poem through once and thought how talented you
190
are to put together the essence of all those sessions - it appealed to me and showed
me what a difficult journey it had been - sitting each week in that chair….but it also
reflected the „happy ending‟ and a wonderful sense of freedom to me -which totally
ties in for me, the swimming across the world to start up a whole new life - as the
hook came out ….but….I had to smile because I still occasionally feel the „stone
across the throat …more self to be created soon….!! It is all strange though - I had a
very happy childhood - felt totally loved and cared for …….so if I felt
wriggly….how much would I have squirmed if childhood had held a different
story..??” (WF).
It feels important that the poem contained what Wriggling Fish saw as the essence of the journal.
For her this seemed like a good fit but it also enabled her to see the continuation of her own
story. I like the fact that she feels her freedom so strongly for it seems the Beast really gave her
power to change her life which the „good girl‟ might not have managed without him.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |