Content Introduction Chapter-i 3 Analytical Tools for Grammatical Meaning

Topic: Means of expressing grammatical meaning
Content
Introduction……………………………………………………………………….2
Chapter-I 3 Analytical Tools for Grammatical Meaning…………………..….6
1.1 Basic methods of expressing grammatical meanings……………………….6
1.2 Means of expressing the grammatical meanings of words………………….8
Chapter –II Types of grammatical forms.….………………………………….17
2.1. Synthetic methods of expressing grammatical meanings…………………17
2.2. Grammatical meaning and grammatical category………………..………..29
III.Conclusion…………..………………………………………………………...38
IV.References......………………………………………………………………...41


INTRODUCTION
National independence not only gave the Uzbek people political and economic independence, but also gave them the opportunity to understand their national identity and, most importantly, to spread it around the world and honorably continue the glory and tradition of the 1X-X1Y centuries. Along with the world-famous socio-spiritual achievements such as the Uzbek model of transition to a market economy, the Uzbek model of training, the independent scientific achievements of Uzbek scientists also attract the attention of intellectuals of advanced countries.
One of the important factors in the spiritual and ideological Russification and manipulation of various nationalities in the USSR was the dominance of the slogans «Education is International», «Grammar is International» in the education system of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the first steps of independence. Although limited by the Law on Education adopted in 2006, the practical implementation of the content of national education is much more difficult and complicated than their social abolition, as it is based on these ominous slogans. For more than half a century, education has poisoned the minds of our people, limited the seeds of nationalism sown in the minds of the people with a genuine-national interpretation of the grammatical structure of the language, and tried to extinguish the national ideology. Eliminating the negative impact of this anti-national movement on our thinking and consciousness requires many years of purposeful and hard work. Linguistics has a special significance and position in this process.
This is because for many years the absolute nationality of the grammatical structure of the national language has been kept secret from the peoples of the USSR (as a doctrine completely contrary to the political system of the former Soviet Union). On the contrary, logic, like the exact sciences, grammar, as a nominal science, was analyzed and taught internationally. However, the similarity in the grammatical structure of different languages ​​is deceptive, superficial, superficial, and characteristic of the imagination of a person who does not have a deep understanding of the essence of grammar. This was expressed by Friedrich Georg Hegel, a methodological pioneer of Soviet ideology who could not or did not want to read the words of his teachers, almost two hundred years ago, in 1831, in the introduction to the book The Science of Logic: It is essentially two different and two different meanings. For beginners, it is one thing for those who are superficially acquainted with science, but for those who master the sciences, study the essence of science and return to it, logic and grammar are a completely different world. Only someone who knows other languages ​​and can compare their grammatical features can discover that the grammatical structure of the national language reflects the psyche and culture of the people. and it has a complete essence. Only such a person can understand through grammar that the psyche - the strict logic - is happening.
No other great genius has emphasized the deep national nature and essence of grammatical construction with such determination and sharpness. Unfortunately, the promotion of this idea is not a picture, because this interpretation, whether large or small, gives the grammar of each language a spirit of uniqueness, equality and independence, national pride as a people. Not everyone likes it, and it is very dangerous for violent multinational empires. But for nations that have embarked on the path of independent development, this idea must become one of the stars of national development. After all, with the correct interpretation of the grammatical structure of the native language, it is possible to achieve the development of the national way of thinking and the seeds of national ideology in the minds of people, their prosperity. To do this, the interpretation of the grammatical structure of the native language must be of a purely national nature. Today, thanks to national independence, a solid foundation has been laid in our country for the creation of such an interpretation of our native language - the first systems aimed at revealing the national nature of our native language2 have been developed, introduced and popularized in the education system. The biggest problem is the lack of educational and methodological literature in this area. Textbooks and manuals on the theory of linguistics of the great linguists O.Azizov, A.Abduazizov, A.Irisqulov, A.Sadikov, S.Usmanov on the samples of Soviet textbooks - the interpretation of the structure of the Uzbek language under the motto «Grammar is international» Therefore, they do not meet the requirements of modern times - grammatical interpretations are not compatible with the programs listed above and are in practice in the education system, the new ones are not yet popular.
This manual differs from existing textbooks and manuals by its compatibility with new national grammatical interpretations. This manual is not only compatible with the existing programs in secondary and higher education, but also an important task for the subject «Introduction to Linguistics» - the basic terms, concepts, methods of analysis of new grammatical interpretations. It also serves to introduce them to the new world of linguistics, to irrigate the national way of thinking and ideology in the minds of intellectuals through national grammatical interpretations. As this is the first textbook in this field, it is not without its shortcomings and controversies that need to be improved. The authors welcome any suggestions and comments aimed at improving the manual.
Grammatical meaning, grammatical form, methods of expressing grammatical meaning, suppletivism, internal inflection, expression of grammatical meaning in different ways, polyfunctionality of a grammatical form.
Grammatical meaning, grammatical form, and grammatical category are the most important concepts of grammar, and they are inextricably linked. Grammatical meaning is expressed in language in a variety of ways. First, let’s talk about grammatical meaning in detail. A grammatical form is a carrier and expression of grammatical meaning. In the Uzbek language, which is agglutinative and synthetic in nature, the suffixes from the suffixes - communication suffixes and suffixes that form a lexical form, mainly express grammatical meaning. For example, if we pay attention to the vocabulary of the book. While the suffix [-i] in this form indicates that the book belongs to some third party, in the «Book of Past Days» the combination of the name of the species and gender forms a compound. These meanings are contained in the suffix [-i], and this meaning is formed by this affixal morpheme. Adverbs have grammatical meanings. For example, in the sentence «From the books on the shelf» the suffix [from] means that something is separated from a certain source, while in the sentence «Fear of conscience» the words «from conscience» and «fear» are connected. The phrase «Anwar came out of the house» refers to the place of origin of a person named Anwar. in the suffix [-i], in the suffix [from] in the sentence «He took from the books on the shelf» there is a negative attitude, in the suffix [-i] of the book «Last days» and in the sentence «Fear the conscience» [ The suffixes from] contain a purely linguistic attitude. Therefore, the grammatical meaning is complex in composition and consists of a combination of linguistic and non-linguistic relations.
Verb tenses also have grammatical meanings. These tenses are not limited to indicating the tense of the words in the speech or text, but also to the time when the events and happenings in the external world took place, that is, during or before the time being spoken. It also serves to express what is happening: Lola read; Lola reads; Lola is a reader.¹