Contents introduction chapter I. Personalized Learning: Language teaching strategies. Tips for language

CONCLUSION
Speaking is the basic skill and an importance part of language learning and teaching. The goal of teaching speaking should improve students' communicative skills efficiency, because only in that way students can express themselves and learn how to follow the social and cultural rules in their real life that appropriate in each communicative situation. Developing speaking material by using scientific approach that related to the five aspects of scientific Approach becomes one of ways to increase the students’ speaking skill.

From the result of need analysis the writer can conclude that the target need was the students could not understand the meaning of communication and they could not speak fluently. In that school, they only get the material in one book and the content of speaking was too general and less activity,game and pictures without any activity that stimulated their thinking and their creativiy that covered their knowledge. So through the development speaking material by using Personalised learning, the students could get the understanding, more active and creative.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. 
   Adams, R. (June 2015). “Murdoch says schools miss out on tech revolution,” Wall Street Journal, May 24,2011. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304066504576343231249392742
   
2. 
   Ames, C. and Archer, J. (1988). “Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
   
3. 
   Anand, A. & Schimke, A. (May 2015). “Grade levels could be a thing of the past in schools focused on competency.” PBS Newshour. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/say-goodbye-fifth-grade-k-
   

12-schools-test-competency-based-learning/

4. 
   Anderson, R. (December 22, 2015). Twitter post. Data Quality Campaign.
   

https://twitter.com/rachelbarrer7/status/679318079868915712

5. 
   Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2010). Next Generation Learning.
   

https://docs.gatesfoundation.org/Documents/nextgenlearning.pdf

6. 
   Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (June 2015). Teachers Know Best: Making Data Work for Teachers and Students. Seattle: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. http://collegeready.gatesfoundation.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/06/TeachersKnowBest-MakingDataWork.compressed.pdf
   
7. 
   Berliner, D.C. (1990). “What’s all the fuss about instructional time?” The Nature of Time in Schools:Theoretical Concepts, Practitioner Perceptions. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   
8. 
   Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington D.C.: National Research Council.
   
9. 
   Brophy, J. (1985). “Teacher influences on student achievement.” American Psychologist, 41, 1069-0177.
   
10. 
    Dalgaard, L. & Ventilla, M. (March 2015). “A ‘full-stack’ approach to education.” 16z Podcast, Andreessen
    
11. 
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). “The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior.” Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
    
12. 
    Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T, & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). “The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.” Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
    
13. 
    Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). “Engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence.” Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
    
14. 
    Graesser, A.C. and McNamara, D.S., & VanLehn, K. (2005). “Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART.” Educational Psychologist, 40, 225-234.
    
15. 
    Grolnick, W.S., Gurland, S.T., DeCourcey, W. & Jacob, K. (2002). “Antecedents and consequences of mothers’ autonomy support: An experimental investigation.” Developmental Psychology, 38 (1),143-155.
    
16. 
    Guernsey, L. & Levine, M.H. (2015). Tap, Click, Read: Growing Readers in a World of Screens. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. p. 73-74.
    
17. 
    Gurland, S.T. and Grolnick, W.S. (2005). “Perceived threat, controlling parenting, and children’s achievement orientations.” Motivation and Emotion, 29 (2), 103-121.
    
18. 
    Guthrie, J.T. (2001). “Contexts for engagement and motivation in reading.” In Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D. & Barr, R. (Eds.) Handbook of Reading Research, Volume 3. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hennessy, S., Wishart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., la Velle, L., McFarlane, A., Ruthven, K.,
    
19. 
    Winterbottom, M. (2007). “Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching.” Computers & Education, 48, 137-152.
    
20. 
    High, R. (2012). The Era of Cognitive Systems: An Inside Look at IBM Watson and How it Works. IBM Corporation. https://developer.ibm.com/watson/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2013/11/The-Eraof-Cognitive-Systems-An-Inside-Look-at-IBM-Watson-and-How-it-Works1.pdf