67
may cause problems with
self-esteem, self-confidence and risk-taking ability and
“ultimately hampers proficiency in the second language” (p. 33). It is possible that
this learner’s English language anxiety might have interfered with more than her
capacity to socially interact in the target language, but also with her cognitive ability
to acquire the target language.
Ching reported that she was unaware of her English
mistakes and said that she
felt happy when someone corrected her mistakes so she could learn from them.
Young (1991, as cited in von Worde, 1998) found that students who suffered from FL
anxiety felt that correction caused anxiety, as did the
absence of correction. Making
mistakes is a part of new language experimentation, and instructors need to let their
students know this and also that it is alright to make mistakes.
The most important
aspect of correction is in how it is done. According to von Worde, instructors should
model corrections, and students should be allowed the opportunity for success after
the correction is modeled.
Motivation
The findings showed that this learner experienced a number of challenges in
learning English, but there are some hindrances that can have a negative effect on all
attempts to learn a foreign language (FL). Some of these hindrances are behavioral or
psychological and pertain to personality. Motivation is perhaps the key affective
variable. Dsrnyei (2002a, as cited in Moss & Ross-Feldman, 2003) identified
motivation as “why people decide to do something, how long they are willing to
sustain the activity [and] how hard they are going to pursue it,” (p. 75). Ellis (1997)
68
identified four types of motivation and observed that motivation
involves the attitudes
and affective states that influence the degree of effort that learners make to learn a
second language, and that it may vary dynamically depending on the context or task
of the language activity. Ching had been
forced to learn English; it was not an
interest or a curiosity she developed on her own. Studies by Gardner (1985) and
Masgoret and Gardner (2003, both cited in Moss & Ross-Feldman) supported the
theory that one particular type of motivation promotes successful acquisition of the
second language, regardless of age, that is,
integrative motivation, learning the
language in order to identify with and become a part of the community that speaks the
language. Ching might have enjoyed becoming a part of her community, but was not
driven to learn English by this integrative type of motivation to the extent that it
would help her overcome her difficulties.
Ellis contrasted the integrative motivations of those who are interested in the
people and culture of the target language with those who
are motivated to learn the
target language by a desire to stand up to and overcome the people of the target
language. Ching was not driven by this flip side of integrative motivation either. She
was not interested in
overcoming the people of her new home culture and language,
even the thought would be absurd to those who knew her; she accepted and wanted to
be accepted by everybody.
An excellent complement to integrative motivation is
resultative motivation,
an energy that comes from the experience of success in the language learning process
that creates the drive to continue (Ellis, 1997). According to Moss and Ross-Feldman
(2003), research on improving learner motivation suggests that social factors such as
69
learning environment,
group dynamics, and even a partner’s motivation, affect a
learner’s attitude, effort, classroom behavior and successful language acquisition
(Dsrnyei, 2002b, as cited in Moss & Ross-Feldman). While the social aspect plays a
major role in developing learner motivation, a learner must experience success in
language learning and experimentation in order to enjoy the resulting motivation; for
Ching, those successes were few and far between.
Perhaps the primary type of motivation for many successful ESL learners,
Dostları ilə paylaş: