Karshi state university master of arts department

CONCLUSION
In this work, an attempt was made to comprehensively study the functional and pragmatic aspects of phraseology on the material of modern English. The suggestion that these phraseological units are the closest to the classical semiotic concept of a sign out of all categories of idiomatics was fully confirmed in the course of the study. As a result of the analysis of categorical and semiotic characteristics, as well as pragmatic and communicative parameters of phraseology, it was found that phraseology acquire full symbolism both in the language system and in discourse.
As the empirical material shows, most phraseologies are deliberately formed with the predominant development of their classical sign functions that can be reproduced through internal semiological processes. However, a group stands out among phraseologies, the development of systemic sign properties of which occurs at the stage of potential phraseology and consists in creating the necessary level of sign redundancy. A large role in this process is given to phraseological abstraction, which contributes to the systemic-linguistic significance of phraseology and their translation into signs of language nomination.
The semantic parameters of phraseologies were analyzed in the light of the cognitive approach. Consideration of the meaning of phraseology in the cognitive aspect made it possible to come to the following conclusion: the intensifying value of phraseology is the kind of language competence that is associated with everyday knowledge about the world; the formation of the intensifying meaning of phraseology is not associated with the transfer of characteristics from one denotation to another and not with the derivation of some values ​​from others, but with a whole complex of transformations in conceptual structures. Each motivated phraseology is assigned some background knowledge derived from the original conceptual structure. The actual meaning of phraseology, understood as a semantic structure formed as a result of metaphorical rethinking, inherits and incorporates certain features of the original prototype, frame or scenario. In the process of forming the meaning of phraseology, an act of metaphorical creativity takes place, in which the metaphorical rethinking of the meaning of the phraseology prototype is accompanied by a semantic transposition, i.e. the transition of phraseology from the category of identifying names to the category of predicates. phraseologies are figurative metaphors that are strongly tied to the position of the predicate.
The connection of phraseology with the position of the predicate indicates that the concept of intensity has already arisen in the depths of the image. An analysis of the factual material led to the conclusion that phraseology - a figurative metaphor is not always preserved in its originality. Getting into the turnover of everyday speech, phraseology - metaphor dies and bequeaths to the language a new meaning - the meaning of intensity. The communicative-pragmatic parameters of phraseologies were studied from the point of view of the communicative model of discursive analysis developed by T. van Dijk. As the analysis of the linguistic material showed, the pragmatic orientation is inherent in the very nature of phraseology, which in turn allows us to speak of this group of phraseological units as a whole layer of phraseology, potentially oriented towards ensuring the implementation of the pre-set communicative-pragmatic goal of the author of the statement. Intensity, which is a statutory feature of the phraseological semantics, finds its realization in discourse in accordance with the author’s intention to have an enhanced impact on the listener through phraseology.
The need to involve the classification of speech acts by J. Searle, the procedure for calculating speech acts by J. Searle, D. Vanderveken, as well as the theory of intentional states by J. Searle in the study of communicative and pragmatic parameters led to our understanding of phraseology in discourse as a sign of illocution, a sign that indicates with what illocutionary force the proposition in the statement is to be understood. It was found that in terms of argumentation, phraseologies are indicators of declarative illocutionary force, and in terms of dialogic complementation, they are indicators of commissive and assertive illocution. In addition, it was found that phraseology contributes to an increase in the intensity and build-up of assertive, commissive and declarative illocutionary forces.
The meanings of speech acts containing phraseology in their composition are an expression of intentionality that permeates the entire discourse. Consequently, the phraseological context and nodes of the expression of the intentionality and consciousness of the speaker. Thus, in this study, the thesis about the relationship between phraseology and phraseological context has received new confirmation. This phenomenon was previously studied by phraseologists in a slightly different perspective. The interaction of phraseological context was considered in semantic and syntactic aspects. Researchers in the field of phraseology have traditionally believed that phraseology enhance the semantics of certain parts of speech (verbs, adverbs, adjectives), since they are syntactically associated with them (Telia 1996, Kunin 1996). In this study, an attempt was made to consider the interaction of phraseology and phraseological context in a pragmatic aspect. Determining the nature of the conditionality of this interaction by the human factor, the factor of the author of the statement, made it possible to conclude that the most important role in organizing the connection between the phraseology and the phraseological context is played by the illocutionary force, linking the phraseology and the context into a semantic unity, which is not destined to disintegrate soon. In an effort to influence the recipient as the conditions of logical argumentation, i.e. rationally organized meaning, and through the factor of personal value orientations expressed by irrational meanings, the binding and guiding parameter of the final meaning is the illocutionary force of the statement. Through the components of the illocutionary force, the dynamic interaction of phraseology and context is carried out.
Summing up the results of the study, we note that at the present stage of linguistic research in the field of phraseology, it is impossible to remain within the framework of the classical structuralist and post-structuralist phraseological theory. To expand knowledge about the phraseological composition of the language, a synthesis of the achievements of cognitive linguistics, discourse theory, psycho- and sociolinguistics is required. Such an interdisciplinary union contributes to the appeal of phraseology to the human or subjective factor in the language, namely, to identifying how the language is used by the subject of speech, depending on his communicative intentions, on the addressee factor, on their common knowledge about the world. This entails the next step - the study of the linguistic factor in a person, the study of how the very linguistic and always culturally colored picture of the world affects a person, forming his linguistic consciousness, and along with it cultural - national self-consciousness.