Table 2: The Effects of AFTA on ASEAN Imports by Country (2001 to 2003)
Dependent Variable:
ASEAN Country i's Import Value of Product
k from Country
j in Year
t
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(6) (7)
Explanatory Variables
Brunei Cambodia
Indonesia
Malaysia
Philippines
Thailand
Vietnam
1.970* 2.693** 0.265** 0.180 0.201*
0.174** 0.002
ln(Country's Preference Margin
(in %) on Product k in Year t) *
(D
NONASEAN
=1)
(0.903) (0.842) (0.090) (0.109) (0.086) (0.055) (0.117)
0.770 4.039** 0.215+ 0.669**
0.283+ 0.220* 0.491*
ln(Country's Preference Margin
(in %) on Product k in Year t) *
(D
ASEAN
=1)
(1.198) (0.696) (0.120) (0.138) (0.152) (0.099) (0.194)
-2.051 -4.471** -0.080 0.099 0.267
-0.095 -0.530**
ln(Country j's GDP in Year t)
(1.580) (1.034) (0.457) (0.273) (0.222) (0.094) (0.176)
year 2002
0.398* -0.758** -0.050+ 0.081* -0.021
0.136** 0.151**
(0.172) (0.220) (0.027) (0.037) (0.024) (0.023) (0.058)
year 2003
-0.960**
-0.198
-0.064
-0.092*
0.189**
0.326**
(0.372)
(0.135)
(0.063)
(0.039)
(0.034)
(0.069)
Observations 5282
6406
69564
81548
66739
149934
33645
Number of groups (by HS6
classification)
2641 2655 26848 29389 24443 54546 12783
Estimation Method
Fixed
Effects
Poisson
Fixed
Effects
Poisson
Fixed
Effects
Poisson
Fixed
Effects
Poisson
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Fixed
Effects
Poisson
Fixed
Effects
Poisson
Notes:
1) Statistical significance indicated as: + significant at 10%; * significant at 5%; ** significant at 1%
2) Reported standard errors are robust and calculated according to Wooldridge (1999).
3) As these regressions are by ASEAN country, the GDP variable for Country
i is subsumed into the year variables.
4) The model for Singapore was not estimated because Singapore's preferential margins were all zero in the sample.
14
Table 3: The Effects of AFTA on ASEAN Imports by HS 1-digit Category (2001 to 2003)
Dependent Variable: ASEAN Country i 's Import Value of Product k from Country j in Year t
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
Explanatory Variables
HS0
HS1
HS2
HS3
HS4
HS5
HS6
HS7
HS8
HS9
0.112
-0.390**
-0.037
-0.053
-0.141*
0.037
-0.028
-0.002
-0.077
0.057
(0.330)
(0.128)
(0.106)
(0.044)
(0.062)
(0.096)
(0.159)
(0.061)
(0.094)
(0.132)
1.379
0.010
-0.127
0.072
0.212+
-0.006
0.213
-0.104
0.283*
-0.275
(1.270)
(0.164)
(0.123)
(0.073)
(0.117)
(0.327)
(0.402)
(0.124)
(0.124)
(0.188)
-0.914*
2.778**
-0.619+
-0.673**
-0.269
-1.710**
-0.256
0.285
0.078
-0.510
(0.446)
(0.700)
(0.363)
(0.191)
(0.335)
(0.278)
(0.526)
(0.352)
(0.448)
(0.608)
-0.082
0.156*
-0.243*
0.100
0.271
0.007
0.299
0.006
-0.225
0.625*
(0.134)
(0.065)
(0.124)
(0.147)
(0.179)
(0.168)
(0.489)
(0.219)
(0.266)
(0.287)
year 2002
-0.000
-0.113+
0.021
0.182**
0.086*
0.173**
-0.034
0.037
0.080
0.121*
(0.253)
(0.066)
(0.064)
(0.029)
(0.037)
(0.036)
(0.079)
(0.047)
(0.058)
(0.060)
year 2003
0.574
-0.295*
0.239*
0.364**
0.186*
0.323**
0.064
0.155+
0.193*
0.236+
(0.466)
(0.145)
(0.102)
(0.054)
(0.075)
(0.064)
(0.126)
(0.094)
(0.098)
(0.143)
Observations
11987
11046
21118
44591
38235
46819
51008
51215
104409
32690
Number of groups (by HS6
classification)
4481
4046
7718
16100
14020
17042
18988
18553
40143
12214
Estimation Method
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Fixed Effects
Poisson
Notes:
1) Statistical significance indicated as: + significant at 10%; * significant at 5%; ** significant at 1%
5) The sample period is 2001-2003.
2) For the Fixed-Effects Estimator, the dependent variable is the natural logarithm of
3) For the Fixed Effects Poisson estimator, the dependent variable is the level of import
4) All regressions exclude Laos, Myanmar, and Singapore. Singapore is not included
ln(Country's Preference Margin
(in %) on Product k in Year t) *
(D
NONASEAN
=1)
ln(Country's Preference Margin
(in %) on Product k in Year t) *
(D
ASEAN
=1)
ln(Country i 's GDP in Year t)
ln(Country j 's GDP in Year t)
15
Endnotes
i
Although the initial AFTA framework
agreements were general, senior officials formulated
specific details over the course of the year and drew up three implementation documents: 1) The
Operational Procedures for CEPT, 2) Rules of Origin for CEPT, and 3) Interpretative Notes to the
Agreement on the CEPT Scheme for AFTA. The AFTA approach of working out details after
launching the project has been characterized as “Agree First Talk After”.
ii
For example, in 2000, Malaysia invoked the Protocol Regarding the Implementation of the CEPT
Scheme Temporary Exclusion List and delayed tariff reductions on completely-built-up
automobiles and automobile knock-down kits in order to protect its local auto industry.
iii
Joint Press Statement by the 5th. Meeting of the AFTA Council, Chiang Mai, Thailand,
September 21, 1994.
iv
The AICO was intended to be an important feature of ASEAN economic cooperation. It was
designed to encourage technology-based investments in ASEAN, and was open to any ASEAN-
based company meeting the following requirements: 1) incorporated in and operating in an ASEAN
country, 2) a minimum of 30 percent ASEAN equity, 3) the company engaged in some form of
resource sharing (such as sharing of technology, market sharing, or consolidated purchases of raw
materials). Raw materials, intermediate products, and output of approved AICO projects would
enjoy 0-5% tariffs immediately. Such products would also enjoy local content accreditation and
non-tariff incentives.
v
However, given the annual publication of tariff rates, some updating may have taken place
between the publication year and the year the tariffs came into effect.
vi
Manchin and Pelkmans-Balaoing illustrate this by showing that the import content (sum of direct
and indirect inputs) of key manufacturing sectors in ASEAN in 2001 ranged from 31% (other
manufacturing) to 67.8% (electronics).
vii
To benefit from preferences, ASEAN exporters are required to submit a cost analysis of the
product to be exported with accompanying invoices for scrutiny and approval by the local trade
ministries. If approved, the local trade ministry provides the exporter with Form D, which is a
certificate that the product qualifies for trade preferences. The exporter may then export the good to
another ASEAN country at the preferential rate, but the goods are still subject to random checks. It
is likely that, instead of facilitating intra-regional trade, the process has turned out to be more time-
consuming and costly in practice relative to ordinary customs clearance.
viii
Intra-industry trade, which is the overlap of imports and exports within a product category, is
classified as vertical if the unit value of imports in the product category differs by at least 15% from
the unit value of exports in the same product category.
ix
The importer-exporter-product fixed effects also help control for all factors related to import
decisions made prior to 2001. These could be, for example, preannounced tariff rates and procedural
changes in customs or FDI flows into an industry that were planned before 2001 but implemented
after.
x
Test results from these robustness checks are not reported but are available from the author
(dcheong@johnshopkins.it).