Research
methodology
36
religion will be included. These background variables are often
related to a number of
independent variables, so that they influence the problem indirectly. Hence they are called
background variables or background characteristics.
Confounding variable
- A variable that is associated with the problem and with a possible
cause of the problem is a potential confounding variable. This type of variable may either
strengthen or weaken the apparent relationship between the problem and a possible cause.
Composite variable
- A variable based on two or more other variables may be termed a
composite variable. Incidence and prevalence rates, sex ratios, and other rates and ratios are
composite variables, since they are based on separate numerator and denominator
information.
I. Operationalising variables by choosing appropriate indicators
Note that the different values of many of the variables presented above can easily be
determined. However, for some variables it is sometimes not possible to find meaningful
categories unless the variables are made operational with one or more precise
INDICATORS
. Operationalising variables means that you make them ‘measurable'.
For example:
1. In a study on VCT acceptance, you want to determine the
level of knowledge
concerning HIV in order to find out to what extent the factor ‘poor knowledge’ influences
willingness to be tested for HIV. The variable ‘level of knowledge’ cannot be measured as
such. You would need to develop a series of questions to assess a person’s knowledge,
for example on modes of transmission of HIV and its prevention methods. The answers to
these questions form an
indicator of someone’s
knowledge on this issue, which can then
be categorised. If 10 questions were asked, you might decide that the knowledge of those
with:
— 0 to 3 correct answers is poor,
— 4 to 6 correct answers is reasonable, and
— 7 to 10 correct answers is good.
Research methodology
37
When defining variables on the basis of the problem analysis diagram, it is important to
realise which variables are measurable as such and which ones need indicators. Once
appropriate indicators have been identified we know exactly what information we are looking
for. This makes the collection of data as well as the analysis more focused and efficient.
2. Nutritional status of under-5 year olds is another example of a variable that cannot be
measured directly and for which you would need to choose appropriate indicators. Widely
used indicators for nutritional
status include weight for age, weight for height, height for age,
and upper-arm circumference. For the classification of nutritional status, internationally
accepted categories already exist, which are based on standard growth curves. For the
indicator weight/age, for example, children are:
• Well nourished if they are above 80%
of the standard
• Moderately malnourished if they are between 60% and 80%
• Severely malnourished if they are below 60%
Dostları ilə paylaş: