raphe cells across the sleep-waking cycle and during
cataplexy in narcoleptic dogs. J Physiol 554, 202–215,
2004.
50. Kolta A, Reader TA. Modulatory effects of catechol-
amines on neurons of the rat visual cortex: single-cell
iontophoretic studies. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 67,
615–623, 1989.
51. Sato H, Fox K, Daw NW. Effect of electrical stimu-
lation of locus coeruleus on the activity of neurons in
the cat visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 62, 946–958, 1989.
52. Bassant MH, Ennouri K, Lamour Y. Effects of ion-
tophoretically applied monoamines on somatosensory
cortical neurons of unanesthetized rats. Neuroscience
39, 431–439, 1990.
53. Lu J, Sherman D, Devor M, et al. A putative flip-flop
switch for control of REM sleep. Nature 441, 589–
594, 2006.
54. Saper CB. Diffuse cortical projection systems: anato-
mical organization and role in cortical function. In:
F. Plum, ed. Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous
System. V. Bethesda, Md.: American Physiological So-
ciety, pp 168–210, 1987.
55. Welch MJ, Meltzer EO, Simons FE. H1-antihistamines
and the central nervous system. Clin Allergy Immunol
17, 337–388, 2002.
56. Huang ZL, Qu WM, Li WD, et al. Arousal effect of
orexin A depends on activation of the histaminergic
system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98, 9965–9970, 2001.
57. Parmentier R, Ohtsu H, Djebbara-Hannas Z, et al.
Anatomical, physiological, and pharmacological char-
acteristics of histidine decarboxylase knock-out mice:
evidence for the role of brain histamine in behavioral
and sleep-wake control. J Neurosci 22, 7695–7711,
2002.
58. Peyron C, Tighe DK, van den Pol AN, et al. Neurons
containing hypocretin (orexin) project to multiple neu-
ronal systems. J Neurosci 18, 9996–10015, 1998.
59. Bittencourt JC, Frigo L, Rissman RA, et al. The dis-
tribution of melanin-concentrating hormone in the
monkey brain (Cebus apella). Brain Res 804, 140–143,
1998.
60. Bittencourt JC, Presse F, Arias C, et al. The melanin-
concentrating hormone system of the rat brain: an
immuno- and hybridization histochemical character-
ization. J Comp Neurol 319, 218–245, 1992.
61. Lin CS, Nicolelis MA, Schneider JS, et al. A major
direct GABAergic pathway from zona incerta to neo-
cortex. Science 248, 1553–1556, 1990.
62. Lee MG, Hassani OK, Jones BE. Discharge of iden-
tified orexin/hypocretin neurons across the sleep-
waking cycle. J Neurosci 25, 6716–6720, 2005.
63. Mileykovskiy BY, Kiyashchenko LI, Siegel JM. Behav-
ioral correlates of activity in identified hypocretin/
orexin neurons. Neuron 46, 787–798, 2005.
64. Verret L, Goutagny R, Fort P, et al. A role of
melanin-concentrating hormone producing neurons
in the central regulation of paradoxical sleep. BMC
Neurosci 4, 19, 2003.
65. Alam MN, Gong H, Alam T, et al. Sleep-waking dis-
charge patterns of neurons recorded in the rat peri-
fornical lateral hypothalamic area. J Physiol 538, 619–
631, 2002.
66. Gelineau JBE. De la narcolepsie. Gaz Hop (Paris)
53, 626–637, 1880.
67. Sakurai T, Amemiya A, Ishii M, et al. Orexins and
orexin receptors: a family of hypothalamic neuropep-
tides and G protein-coupled receptors that regulate
feeding behavior. Cell 92, 573–585, 1998.
68. de Lecea L, Kilduff TS, Peyron C, et al. The hypo-
cretins: hypothalamus-specific peptides with neuro-
excitatory activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95, 322–327,
1998.
69. Willie JT, Chemelli RM, Sinton CMYM. To eat or to
sleep? Orexin in the regulation of feeding and wake-
fulness. Annu Rev Neurosci 24, 429–458, 2001.
70. Chimelli RM, Willie JT, Sinton CM, et al. Narcolepsy
in orexin knockout mice: molecular genetics of sleep
regulation. Cell 98, 437–451, 1999.
71. Lin L, Faraco J, Li R, et al. The sleep disorder canine
narcolepsy is caused by a mutation in the hypocretin
(orexin) receptor 2 gene. Cell 98, 365–376, 1999.
72. Peyron C, Faraco J, Rogers W, et al. A mutation in a
case of early onset narcolepsy and a generalized ab-
sence of hypocretin peptides in human narcoleptic
brains. Nat Med 6, 991–997, 2000.
73. Ripley B, Overeem S, Fujiki N, et al. CSF hypocretin/
orexin levels in narcolepsy and other neurological con-
ditions. Neurology 57, 2253–2258, 2001.
74. Thannickal TC, Moore RY, Nienhuis R, et al. Reduced
number of hypocretin neurons in human narcolepsy.
Neuron 27, 469–474, 2000.
75. Marcus JN, Aschkenasi CJ, Lee CE, et al. Differential
expression of orexin receptors 1 and 2 in the rat brain.
J Comp Neurol 435, 6–25, 2001.
76. Saper CB. Organization of cerebral cortical afferent
systems in the rat. II. Magnocellular basal nucleus.
J Comp Neurol 222, 313–342, 1984.
77. Zaborsky L, Brownstein MJ, Palkovits M. Ascending
projections to the hypothalamus and limbic nuclei
from the dorsolateral pontine tegmentum: a biochem-
ical and electron microscopic study. Acta Morphol
Acad Sci Hung 25, 175–188, 1977.
78. Zaborsky L, Cullinan WE, Luine VN. Catecholami-
nergic-cholinergic interaction in the basal forebrain.
Prog Brain Res 98, 31–49, 1993.
79. Lee MG, Hassani OK, Alonso A, et al. Cholinergic
basal forebrain neurons burst with theta during
waking and paradoxical sleep. J Neurosci 25, 4365–
4369, 2005.
80. Richardson RT, DeLong MR. Nucleus basalis of
Meynert neuronal activity during a delayed response
task in monkey. Brain Res 399, 364–368, 1986.
81. Richardson RT, DeLong MR. Context-dependent
responses of primate nucleus basalis neuron in a go/
no-go-go task. J Neurol Sci 10, 2528–2540, 1990.
82. Sherin JE, Shiromani PJ, McCarley RW, et al. Acti-
vation of ventrolateral preoptic neurons during sleep.
Science 271, 216–219, 1996.
83. Sherin JE, Elmquist JK, Torrealba F, et al. Inner-
vation of histaminergic tuberomammilary neurons
by GABAergic and alaninergic neurons in the ven-
36
Plum and Posner’s Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma
trolateral preoptic nucleus of the rat. J Neurosci 18,
4705–4721, 1998.
84. Saper CB, Chou TC, Scammell TE. The sleep switch:
hypothalamic control of sleep and wakefulness. Trends
Neurosci 24, 726–731, 2001.
85. Gaus SE, Strecker RE, Tate BA, et al. Ventrolateral
preoptic nucleus contains sleep-active, galaninergic
neurons in multiple mammalian species. Neurosci-
ence 115, 285–294, 2002.
86. Sallanon M, Denoyer M, Kitahama K, et al. Long-
lasting insomnia induced by preoptic neuron lesions
and its transient reversal by muscimol injection into
the posterior hypothalamus in the cat. Neuroscience
32, 669–683, 1989.
87. Lu J, Greco MA, Shiromani P, et al. Effect of lesions
of the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus on NREM and
REM sleep. J Neurosci 20, 3820–3842, 2000.
88. Lu J, Bjorkum AA, Xu M, et al. Selective activation
of the extended ventrolateral preoptic nucleus dur-
ing rapid eye movement sleep. J Neurosci 22, 4568–
4576, 2002.
89. Hara J, Beuckmann CT, Nambu T, et al. Genetic ab-
lation of orexin neurons in mice results in narcolepsy,
hypophagia, and obesity. Neuron 30, 345–354, 2001.
90. Lydic R, Douglas CL, Baghdoyan HA. Microinjection
of neostigmine into the pontine reticular formation of
C57BL/6J mouse enhances rapid eye movement sleep
and depresses breathing. Sleep 25, 835–841, 2002.
91. Lorente de No R. Cerebral cortex: architecture,
intracortical connections, motor projections. In: JF
Fulton, ed. Physiology of the Nervous System. New
York: Oxford University Press, pp 291–340, 1938.
92. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Shape and arrangement of
columns in cat’s striate cortex. J Physiol 165, 559–
568, 1963.
93. McCasland JS, Woolsey TA. High-resolution 2-
deoxyglucose mapping of functional cortical columns
in mouse barrel cortex. J Comp Neurol 278, 555–
569, 1988.
94. Gilbert CD, Wiesel TN. Columnar specificity of in-
trinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in
cat visual cortex. J Neurosci 9, 2432–2442, 1989.
95. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. The period of susceptibility
to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure
in kittens. J Physiol 206, 419–436, 1970.
96. Frank MG, Issa NP, Stryker MP. Sleep enhances plas-
ticity in the developing visual cortex. Neuron 30, 275–
287, 2001.
97. Hardcastle VG. Consciousness and the neurobiology
of perceptual binding. Semin Neurol 17, 163–170,
1997.
98. Revonsuo A. Binding and the phenomenal unity of con-
sciousness. Conscious Cogn 8, 173–185, 1999.
99. Nishikawa T, Okuda J, Mizuta I, et al. Conflict of in-
tentions due to callosal disconnection. J Neurol Neuro-
surg Psychiatry 71, 462–471, 2001.
100. Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL. Parallel
organization of functionally segregated circuits linking
basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 9, 357–
381, 1986.
101. Alexander GE, Crutcher MD, DeLong MR. Basal
ganglia-thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for
motor,oculomotor,‘‘prefrontal’’and‘‘limbic’’functions.
Prog Brain Res 119–146, 1990.
102. Wyrtzes LM, Chatrian GE, Shaw CM, et al. Acute
failure of forebrain with sparing of brain-stem func-
tion. Electroencephalographic, multimodality evoked-
potential, and pathologic findings. Arch Neurol 46,
93–97, 1989.
103. van der Knaap MS, Smit LS, Nauta JJ, et al. Cortical
laminar abnormalities—occurrence and clinical sig-
nificance. Neuropediatrics 24, 143–148, 1993.
104. Adams JH, Graham DI, Jennett B. The neuropathol-
ogy of the vegetative state after an acute brain insult.
Brain 123, 1327–1338, 2000.
105. Caplan LR. ‘‘Top of the basilar’’ syndrome. Neurology
30, 72–79, 1980.
106. Wechler B, Dell’Isola B, Vidailhet M, et al. MRI in
31 patients with Behcet’s disease and neurological
involvement: prospective study with clinical correla-
tion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 56, 793–798,
1993.
107. Park-Matsumoto YC, Ogawa K, Tazawa T, et al.
Mutism developing after bilateral thalamo-capsular
lesions by neuro-Behcet disease. Acta Neurol Scand
91, 297–301, 1995.
108. Kinney HC, Korein J, Panigrahy A, et al. Neuro-
pathological findings in the brain of Karen Ann
Quinlan. The role of the thalamus in the persistent
vegetative state. N Engl J Med 330 (21), 1469–1475,
1994.
109. Reeves AG, Plum F. Hyperphagia, rage, and demen-
tial accompanying a ventromedial hypothalamic neo-
plasm. Arch Neurol 20, 616–624, 1969.
110. Parvizi J, Damasio AR. Neuroanatomical correlates
of brainstem coma. Brain 126, 1524–1536, 2003.
Pathophysiology of Signs and Symptoms of Coma
37
Chapter
2
Examination of the
Comatose Patient
OVERVIEW
HISTORY
GENERAL PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS
ABC: AIRWAY, BREATHING,
CIRCULATION
Circulation
Respiration
PUPILLARY RESPONSES
Examine the Pupils and Their Responses
Pathophysiology of Pupillary Responses:
Peripheral Anatomy of the Pupillomotor
System
Pharmacology of the Peripheral
Pupillomotor System
Localizing Value of Abnormal Pupillary
Responses in Patients in Coma
Metabolic and Pharmacologic Causes
of Abnormal Pupillary Response
OCULOMOTOR RESPONSES
Functional Anatomy of the Peripheral
Oculomotor System
Functional Anatomy of the Central
Oculomotor System
The Ocular Motor Examination
Interpretation of Abnormal
Ocular Movements
MOTOR RESPONSES
Motor Tone
Motor Reflexes
Motor Responses
FALSE LOCALIZING SIGNS IN PATIENTS
WITH METABOLIC COMA
Respiratory Responses
Pupillary Responses
Ocular Motor Responses
Motor Responses
MAJOR LABORATORY DIAGNOSTIC AIDS
Blood and Urine Testing
Computed Tomography Imaging
and Angiography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
and Angiography
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Neurosonography
Lumbar Puncture
Electroencephalography and
Evoked Potentials
OVERVIEW
Coma, indeed any alteration of consciousness,
is a medical emergency. The physician encoun-
tering such a patient must begin examination
and treatment simultaneously. The examina-
tion must be thorough, but brief. The examina-
tion begins by informally assessing the patient’s
level of consciousness. First, the physician ad-
dresses the patient verbally. If the patient does
38
not respond to the physician’s voice, the phy-
sician may speak more loudly or shake the pa-
tient. When this fails to produce a response,
the physician begins a more formal coma eval-
uation.
The examiner must systematically assess the
arousal pathways. To determine if there is a
structural lesion involving those pathways, it is
necessary also to examine the function of brain-
stem sensory and motor pathways that are ad-
jacent to the arousal system. In particular, be-
cause the oculomotor circuitry enfolds and
surrounds most of the arousal system, this part
of the examination is particularly informative.
Fortunately, the examination of the comatose
patient can usually be accomplished very quickly
because the patient has such a limited range of
responses.However, theexaminermust become
conversant with the meaning of the signs elic-
ited in that examination, so that decisions that
may save the patient’s life can then be made
quickly and accurately.
The evaluation of the patient with a reduced
level of consciousness, like that of any patient,
requires a history (to the extent possible), phys-
ical examination, and laboratory evaluation.
These are considered, in turn, in this chapter.
However, as soon as it is determined that a
patient has a depressed level of consciousness,
the next step is to ensure that the patient’s
brain is receiving adequate blood and oxygen.
The emergency treatment of the comatose pa-
tient is detailed in Chapter 7. The physiology
and pathophysiology of the cerebral circulation
and of respiration are considered in the para-
graphs below.
HISTORY
In patients with nervous system dysfunction,
the history is the most important part of the
examination (Table 2–1). Of course, patients
with coma or diminished states of conscious-
ness by definition are not able to give a history.
Thus, the history must be obtained if possible
from relatives, friends, or the individuals,
usually the emergency medical personnel, who
brought the patient to the hospital.
The onset of coma is often important. In a
previously healthy, young patient, the sudden
onset of coma may be due to drug poisoning,
subarachnoid hemorrhage, or head trauma; in
the elderly, sudden coma is more likely caused
by cerebral hemorrhage or infarction. Most pa-
tients with lesions compressing the brain either
have a clear history of trauma (e.g., epidural
hematoma; see Chapter 4) or a more gradual
rather than abrupt impairment of conscious-
ness. Gradual onset is also true of most patients
with metabolic disorders (see Chapter 5).
The examiner should inquire about previous
medical symptoms or illnesses or any recent
trauma. A history of headache of recent onset
points to a compressive lesion, whereas the his-
tory of depression or psychiatric disease may
suggest drug intoxication. Patients with known
diabetes, renal failure, heart disease, or other
chronic medical illness are more likely to be
suffering from metabolic disorders or perhaps
brainstem infarction. A history of premonitory
signs, including focal weakness such as dragging
Table 2–1 Examination of the
Comatose Patient
History ( from Relatives, Friends, or Attendants)
Onset of coma (abrupt, gradual)
Recent complaints (e.g., headache, depression,
focal weakness, vertigo)
Recent injury
Previous medical illnesses (e.g., diabetes,
renal failure, heart disease)
Previous psychiatric history
Access to drugs (sedatives, psychotropic drugs)
General Physical Examination
Vital signs
Evidence of trauma
Evidence of acute or chronic systemic illness
Evidence of drug ingestion (needle marks,
alcohol on breath)
Nuchal rigidity (assuming that cervical trauma
has been excluded)
Neurologic Examination
Verbal responses
Eye opening
Optic fundi
Pupillary reactions
Spontaneous eye movements
Oculocephalic responses (assuming cervical
trauma has been excluded)
Oculovestibular responses
Corneal responses
Respiratory pattern
Motor responses
Deep tendon reflexes
Skeletal muscle tone
Examination of the Comatose Patient
39
of the leg or complaints of unilateral sensory
symptoms or diplopia, suggests a cerebral or
brainstem mass lesion.
GENERAL PHYSICAL
EXAMINATION
The general physical examination is an im-
portant source of clues as to the cause of
unconsciousness. After stabilizing the patient
(Chapter 7), one should search for signs of
head trauma. Bilateral symmetric black eyes
suggest basal skull fracture, as does blood be-
hind the tympanic membrane or under the
skin overlying the mastoid bone (Battle’s sign).
Examine the neck with care; if there is a pos-
sibility of trauma, the neck should be im-
mobilized until cervical spine instability has
been excluded by imaging. Resistance to neck
flexion in the presence of easy lateral move-
ment suggests meningeal inflammation such as
meningitis or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Flex-
ion of the legs upon flexing the neck (Brud-
zinski’s sign) confirms meningismus. Examina-
tion of the skin is also useful. Needle marks
suggest drug ingestion. Petechiae may suggest
meningitis or intravascular coagulation. Pres-
sure sores or bullae indicate that the patient
has been unconscious and lying in a single
position for an extended period of time, and
are especially frequent in patients with barbitu-
rate overdosage.
1
LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS
After conducting the brief history and exami-
nation as outlined above and stabilizing the
patients’ vital functions, the examiner should
conduct a formal coma evaluation. In assessing
the level of consciousness of the patient, it is
necessary to determine the intensity of stim-
ulation necessary to arouse a response and the
quality of the response that is achieved. When
the patient does not respond to voice or vigor-
ous shaking, the examiner next provides a source
of pain to arouse the patient. Several methods
for providing a sufficiently painful stimulus to
arouse the patient without causing tissue dam-
age are illustrated in Figure 2–1. It is best to
begin with a modest, lateralized stimulus, such
as compression of the nail beds, the supraor-
bital ridge, or the temporomandibular joint.
These give information about the lateralization
of motor response (see below), but must be
repeated on each side in case there is a focal
lesion of the pain pathways on one side of the
brain or spinal cord. If there is no response to
the stimulus, a more vigorous midline stimulus
may be given by the sternal rub. By vigorously
pressing the examiner’s knuckles into the pa-
tient’s sternum and rubbing up and down the
chest, it is possible to create a sufficiently pain-
ful stimulus to arouse any subject who is not
deeply comatose.
The response of the patient is noted and
graded. The types of motor responses seen are
considered in the section on motor responses
(page 73). However, the level of response is
important to the initial consideration of the
depth of impairment of consciousness. In des-
cending order of arousability, a sleepy patient
who responds to being addressed verbally or
light shaking, or one who responds verbally to
more intense mechanical stimulation, is said to
be lethargic or obtunded. A patient whose best
response to deep pain is to attempt to push the
examiner’s arm away is considered to be stu-
porous, with localizing responses. Patients who
A
B
C
D
Figure 2–1. Methods for attempting to elicit responses from unconscious patients. Noxious stimuli can be delivered with
minimal trauma to the supraorbital ridge (A), the nail beds or the fingers or toes (B), the sternum (C) or the temporo-
mandibular joints (D).
40
Plum and Posner’s Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma
Box 2–1 Coma Scales
A number of different scales have been devised for scoring patients with coma.
The value of these is in providing a simple estimate of the prognosis for different
groups of patients. Obviously, this is related as much to the cause of the coma
(when known) as to the current status of the examination. Teasdale and Jennett’s
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS),
2
devised to categorize patients with head trauma, is
reproduced below. Unfortunately, when used by emergency room physicians, in-
terrater agreement is only moderate.
3
Two simple scales, ACDU (alert, confused,
drowsy, unresponsive) and AVPU (alert, response to voice, response to pain, un-
responsive)
4
are about as accurate as the GCS and much easier to use.
4
The
ACDU scale appears better at identifying early deterioration in level of con-
sciousness. A recently validated coma scale, the FOUR scale (full outline of un-
responsiveness), provides more neurologic detail than the GCS. However, no
Dostları ilə paylaş: |