superlative structures make effective comparisons.)
4) Body paragraph 2
In comparison, Canadians contributed 1.8% of their income to clothes,
whereas this figure experienced a slight increase to 2.2% for Peruvians.
Similarly, both nations considered the smallest proportion of their
budget for entertainment. This trend stood at 0.8% for Canada;
however, it had a modest growth to 1.2% for Peru.
(Clothes and entertainment share some resemblance. This similarity makes
a comparison. Comparative and superlative structures have facilitated the
description of the data using specific vocabulary and phrases.)
Sample writing
The pie charts give information on the percentage
of household expenses
for Canadians and Peruvians in 2000.
Overall, both countries spent the largest amount of their annual budget on
housing. On the other hand , the lowest amount of money was allocated to
entertainment for both nations .
Regarding the given data, both Canada and Peru spent the most significant
amount of their annual income on housing with 8.2% and 6.5% respectively
in the year 2000. Food accounted for the second-highest expenditure that
was attributed in both countries . While this amount was 4.1% for Canada,
it had a moderate reduction to 3.2% for Peru.
In
comparison , Canadians contributed 1.8% of their income to clothes,
whereas this figure experienced a slight increase to 2.2% for Peruvians.
Similarly , both nations considered the smallest proportion of their budget
for entertainment. This trend stood at 0.8% for Canada; however , it had a
modest growth to 1.2% for Peru.
(152 words)
Dostları ilə paylaş: 
