Singapore Med J 2011; 52(7) : 466
hen Ronald Ross won the Nobel Prize
in 1902, he completed a remarkable
turnaround in a career many friends
and colleagues assumed would go
nowhere. He had no initial interest in
medicine, and wished instead to be an artist. Born in 1857
in Almora, India, Ross was 17 when his father, General
Sir Campbell Ross, deposited him at St Bartholomew’s
Medical School in London. He was a poor student and
barely passed his qualifying exams, and so he began his
career as a Licentiate of the Society of Apothecaries, the
easiest medical license obtainable.
FroM poeT To ScienTiST
Ross thought incessantly about
dropping medicine for poetry, but
his verse, described as “stiff with
classical allusion”, never gained an
audience. He worked as a reluctant
clinician in India from 1881 to 1889,
serving in the military branch of the
Indian Medical Service. The job
allowed him the free time he longed
for, but offered him little access
to leaders in medicine. In 1889,
when home in Britain and again
contemplating a change to a literary
career, he married Rosa Bloxam and returned to school
for a Diploma in Public Health. It was a turning point in
his life. For the first time, he developed an enthusiasm
for medicine and became an ardent contributor to the
Indian Medical Gazette. In 1894, he met Patrick Manson,
the pre-eminent Scottish physician who was to be his
tireless mentor and advocate. Manson had carried out
important studies on parasites such as trichophyton,
filaria, schistosoma and trypanosoma. It was Manson
who, using filaria as his model, introduced the concept
of arthropods as vectors of disease. And it was Manson
who proposed that mosquitoes might play a similar role
in malaria.
As late as 1893, Ross remained ignorant of malaria’s
pathogenesis, subscribing to the view that the disease
was caused by intestinal bacteria. This was despite
the discovery by Charles Laveran of the Plasmodium
protozoon on a blood smear more than ten years before.
Manson realised that Ross was employing an incorrect
technique with his microscope, and in their first meeting,
demonstrated the correct preparation of the smear.
Confronted with the ringed form of the parasite, Ross
underwent rapid conversion to Manson’s view.
THe perSiSTenT ScienTiST
Ross’s return
to India marked the beginning
of the most productive period of
his career. Following Manson’s
advice to look at the mosquito as a
vector, he began by collecting the
insects and allowing them to feed
on human “volunteers” infected
with malaria. He then dissected
the mosquito specimens, imitating
Manson’s experiments with filaria.
Unfortunately, the dissections
revealed none of the ringed forms
he had hoped to find. In retrospect,
Ross failed because the mosquitoes
he used were likely Culex and
Aedes, both plentiful in India, but neither capable of
transmitting malaria.
But persistence won the day. Undaunted by the
initial delays, he pressed on with his experiments. In
August of 1897, one of his servants brought him a new
type of mosquito. Ross referred to them as “dapple-
wings”, but in fact, they were Anopheles. He allowed
the mosquitoes to feed on a malaria patient, and upon
subsequent dissection, discovered the parasite in the
stomachs of the biting insects. This was an exhilarating
breakthrough, and Ross published his findings in a letter
to the British Medical Journal. He was stalled in further
investigation by his inability to locate more anophelines,
Medicine in Stamps
ronald ross (1857–1932):
discoverer of malaria’s life cycle
dworkin J, Md* and Tan S Y, Md, Jd**
* Research carried out during 3rd year internal medicine residency, University of Hawaii
** Former Professor of Medicine and Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Hawaii
W
Singapore Med J 2011; 52(7) : 467
and was soon transferred to a semi-desert region of India
where malaria cases were infrequent. Expressing his
frustration in characteristic verse, he lamented:
God makes us kings
Scornful answer rings
First be my scavenger
At this desperate moment, when Ross’s research
was on the precipice, his mentor Manson intervened
decisively. Pulling strings at the Colonial Office, he had
Ross reassigned to Calcutta to pursue his experiments
through the final phase. The effort reached its summit in
June of 1898. Forced to develop an animal model due to
the lack of human volunteers, Ross dissected mosquitoes
at sequential points after they had fed on sparrows. By
observing the Plasmodium parasite at different times in
its maturation within the mosquito, he demonstrated the
importance of the vector in the normal development of
the parasite. His ultimate breakthrough came on July 4
when he discovered sporozoites in the salivary glands
of the mosquito. This was final proof that mosquitoes
infected through their bite. He informed both Manson
and Laveran of his discovery, and at the end of July,
Manson presented his results to the British Medical
Association in Edinburgh.
aTTeMpTS aT eradicaTion
Ross now set as his
modest goal the destruction of all Anopheles mosquito
populations in the tropics. In August 1899, he landed
with a small expedition in Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Accompanied by an entomologist, the team succeeded
in identifying the relevant local species of Anopheles,
as well as the moderate-sized pools of stale water in
which they bred. The overconfident Ross wrote: “There
are only about 100 of these (puddles) altogether, lying
mostly in clusters. All could be drained at little cost and
most could be swept out with a broom”.
Alas, the vector control effort failed. Ross had
underestimated the number and variety of breeding
sites; the mosquito was quite adaptive about changing
its terrain when confronted by environmental pressure,
and pouring oil over stagnant pools was at best a
temporary strategy. The colonial government ultimately
opted to abandon this effort and instead constructed a
segregated suburb in the hills above the city. Ross’s first
offensive against the mosquito had ended in the retreat
of the humans.
Further efforts at eradication proved equally
disappointing. A major push by the British in Mian Muir,
a barracks town in India plagued by malaria, ended in
a spectacular setback. Despite the expenditure by the
British Army of vast money and manpower in larva
eradication between 1901 and 1909, malaria remained
rampant. It was only the larger campaigns launched later
in Europe that met with measurable success, although
they required the use of pesticides in addition to active
treatment of patients and drainage of swamplands.
legacY
Ross won the Nobel Prize for Medicine/
Physiology in 1902, yet the award betrayed the ego
that was his chief character flaw. Hearing a suggestion
that he should share his award with Manson, Ross
responded: “The work was done by me alone, with
Manson’s occasional advice, it is true, but not his
instructions, as frequently pretended.” Surely this was
overly dismissive given the enormous correspondence
between the two, Ross’s imitation of Manson’s
experiments with filaria and Manson’s contribution of
the mosquito vector theory.
The annual global research budget for malaria now
exceeds four hundred million dollars, a sum that is
considered by many experts to be too small for the task.
Contrast this with the few hundred pounds that Ross
budgeted for his eradication programme in Freetown in
1899. The Plasmodium parasite has proved remarkably
resistant to vaccine development, in part because it
deploys sophisticated strategies of immune evasion. It is
also increasingly resistant to the drugs commonly used
in treatment. Ultimately, the secrets Ross unlocked have
led to even more vexing questions about malaria, which
Ross the poet called “million-murdering Death.”
BiBliograpHY
• Desowitz R. The Malaria Capers: More tales of Parasites and
People, Research and Reality. New York-London: WW Norton
& Company, 1991.
• Fillinger U, Sombroek H, Majambere S, et al. Identifying the
most productive breeding sites for malaria mosquitoes in The
Gambia. Malar J 2009; 8:62.
• Harrison G. Mosquitoes, Malaria, and Man: A History of the
Hostilities since 1880. New York: EP Dutton, 1978.
• Talbott JH. A Biographical History of Medicine: Excerpts and
Essays of the Men and their Work. New York-London: Grune &
Stratton, 1970: 768-73.
• Trager L, Spielman A, Simpson L. Malaria, not down and
certainly not out. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005; 73:824-5.
• Voelker R. Attention sought for neglected diseases. JAMA 2009;
301:1755-6.
• Guerin PJ, Olliaro P, Nosten F, et al. Malaria: current status of
control, diagnosis, treatment, and a proposed agenda for research
and development. Lancet Infect Dis 2002; 2:564-73.
• Ross R. The Role of the mosquito in the evolution of the malaria
parasite: the recent researches of Surgeon-Major Ronald Ross,
IMS. Yale J Bio Med 2002; 75:103-5.
• The mosquito-malaria theory. Yale J Biol Med 2002; 75:102.