1. about the subject


The notion of ‘falsifiers of history”



Yüklə 88,79 Kb.
səhifə15/22
tarix28.11.2022
ölçüsü88,79 Kb.
#70995
1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   ...   22
K. Shukurov. Introduction to History. Theoretical and methodological problems of Azerbaijan History. (4)

The notion of ‘falsifiers of history”. The historical literature of Azerbaijan lists the bourgeois falsifiers under the name of historical falsifiers. It is sufficient to mention the names of the books: T. Kocharli, “Against the Falsifiers of history (The Socialist Revolution in Azerbaijan in the perversion of Historical Bourgeois falsifiers)” (Baku, 1972);
"Against the bourgeois falsifiers of the history and culture of Azerbaijan" (Baku, 1978) and so on. This term was later replaced by "modern falsifiers", but the essence remained unchanged.
Azerbaijan historians treated more "kindly", itemized some “drawbacks” or pointed to “shortcomings”, when it came to "fellows " or their Soviet counterparts, which had very bad effects. Thus, the native historians and their Soviet colleagues were also among those who falsified the history of Azerbaijan and were more arrogant, while the "bourgeois falsifiers" tried to write more or less the truth.
Russian Soviet historians have proved that Bolshevism and its theory do not represent the interests of not only the remote regions of Russia, but also the Russian people, and thus, it is not necessary to mention about Azerbaijan.

Conclusions by R.Suni, “in Transcaucasia, especially in Baku, the revolution turned from class conflict into the war of nations, the Bolsheviks that came to power in Petrograd and Moscow, declared war on the those who did not want to recognize the Soviet monopoly”, F.Kazimzadeh, “Red Army occupied the Transcaucasian Republics in 1920-1921, and Moscow disguised the true nature of its power by signing treaties with the Bolshevik government”, Т.Svyatokhovski on the establishment of Azerbaijan Democratic Republic were also “criticized” without any reasonable evidences.


“The usage of abusive combinations instead of indifferent, convincing scientific expressions, first of all, proves the incompetence of the person who availed of this “opportunity. However, the tradition of scientific historiography has always been far from such an unconditional mendacity - a mendacity that does not choose the good over the bad” - this true statement was made by S.Aliyarov.



Yüklə 88,79 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   ...   22




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©azkurs.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin