context and calls for further research in understanding the complex interrelation-
ships in Asian capitalism.
The third section includes chapters by Martin, Asheim, Beyers, Watts, Glasmeier,
Lovering, Green, and Malecki on regional competitiveness. Ron Martin’s chap-
ter focuses on the contemporary issue of regional competitiveness, with its
antecedents in the pervasive phenomenon of geographically uneven develop-
ment. The distinctiveness of current thinking is that disparities in performance
are explicitly about competitiveness rather than ‘place’ competition. Martin
explains discourses of competitiveness highlighting the contribution of econo-
mists, and how regional competitiveness can be seen as an evolutionary process.
He argues that economic geographers have an important role to play in explaining
and critiquing the idea of regional competitiveness as a way of thinking about the
economic landscape and provides scope for economic geographers’ engagement
in public policy debates.
Björn Asheim writes about contextualizing economic geography, geography
as a synthetic discipline, the co-evolution of Nordic economic geography with
institutional/evolutionary economics leading to an international leading posi-
tion when it comes to studies of cluster and innovation systems, and the applied
side of this in accordance with the third task. He reflects on the theoretical
development of the discipline, discussing the role of abstract theoretization in
a Marxist tradition which was used in the early 1980s, but which seemed to
have disappeared with the transition from studying Fordist to post-Fordist
economic spaces. He argues that this is also related to realism as an epistemolog-
ical approach, that is, the relation between abstract and concrete research, and
the role played by contingencies in the economic spaces studied.
In ‘Approaching research methods in economic geography’, Bill Beyers
reminds us that there is no one methodological or philosophical perspective that
works for all. Each reader will construct for themselves their own approach and
each contributor has his/her own ways of utilizing methodologies to answer
research questions. Trained as a regional scientist, he values quantitative analysis,
formal models, and the use of theory to frame research methods. His own
research experience provides the following categorization: (1) approaches driven
primarily by methods or models developed by others; (2) exploratory research
motivated by pure curiosity; (3) approaches motivated by existing theories;
(4) approaches driven by secondary data; (5) research driven by the development
of technologies; (6) research driven by unexpected outcomes; (7) research that
has value to the applied research community; and (8) collaborative research
between faculty and students.
Doug Watts reflects on how the spatial organization of production within
multi-regional firms has been theorized, empirically studied, and taught since the
1950s. He records that the economic landscape has changed as the contribution
to regional employment by large multi-regional firms declined while the contri-
bution of smaller firms increased from the 1980s, however, the large firm
remains a key actor in the global economic system and cannot be ignored in
understanding regional economic change.
6
Dostları ilə paylaş: