Microsoft Word language assessment theory with practice

language (EFL) education (pp. 119-173). Ankara: Vizetek.
Hatipoğlu, Ç. & Algi, S. (2017). Contextual and pragmatic functions of modal 
epistemic hedges in argumentative paragraphs in Turkish. In Çiler Hatipoğlu, 
Erdem Akbaş & Yasemin Bayyurt (Eds.), Metadiscourse across Genres: 
Uncovering Textual and Interactional Aspects of Texts (pp. 85-108). Frankfurt: 
Peter Lang (ISBN: 978-3-631-72062-2). 
Hatipoğlu, Ç. & Algi, S. (2018). Catch a tiger by the toe: Modal hedges in EFL 
argumentative
Heaton, J. B. (1990). Writing English Language Tests. Longman. 
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers (Second Edition). Cambridge 
University Press. 

---

Language Assessment - Theory with Practice
208 
Irons, A. (2007). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. 
Routledge. 
Jennings, M., Fox, J., Graves, B. & Shohamy, E. (1999). The test-takers’ choice: an 
investigation of the effect of topic on language-test performance. Language 
Testing, 16(4), 426-456. 
Juwah, C., Macfarlane-dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D. & Smith, B. (2004). 
Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. UK: The Higher 
Education Academy Generic Centre. 
Lam, R. & Lee, I. (2010). Balancing the dual functions of portfolio assessment. ELT 
Journal, 64(1), 54-64. 
Loumbourdi, L. (2014). The Power and Impact of Standardised Tests: Investigating the 
Washback of Language Exams in Greece. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH. 
Madsen, H. S. (1983). Techniques in testing. Oxford University Press. 
Mak, P. & Wong, K.M., (2018). Self-regulation through portfolio assessment in 
writing classrooms. ELT Journal, 72(1), 49-61. 
Manchón, R. (Ed.). (2009). Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, 
and research (Vol. 43). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 
McCallum, S. & Milner, M. M. (2021) The effectiveness of formative assessment: 
student views and staff reflections. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher 
Education, 46(1), 1-16, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761 
McCurdy, B. L. & Shapiro, E. S. (1992). A comparison of teacher-, peer-, and self-
monitoring with curriculum-based measurement in reading among students with 
learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 26(2), 162-180. 
Muir, M. (2001, November). What engages underachieving middle school students in 
learning? Middle School Journal, 33(2), 37–43. 
Narciss, S. & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for 
multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner and R. Brunken (Eds.), 
Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Munster, NY: 
Waxmann. 
Nicol, D. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated 
learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in 
Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. 
Pauly, D. N. & Nottbusch, G. (2020). The influence of the German capitalisation rules 
on reading. Frontiers in Communication. https://doi.org/10. 3389/fcomm. 
2020.00015 
Price, M., Handley, K, Millar, J. & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, 
but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (3), 277–
289. doi:10.1080/02602930903541007. 
Rakedzon, T. & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2017). To make a long story short: A rubric for 
assessing graduate students’ academic and popular science writing skills. 
Assessing Writing, 32, 28-42. 

---

Assessment of Language Skills: Productive Skills
209 
Rukmini, D. & Saputri, L. A. D. E. (2017). The authentic assessment to measure 
students’ English productive skills based on 2013 Curriculum. Indonesian Journal