Of medical and pedagogical faculty worker program on the subject of «internal diseases» for VII

Note: Endocrinology subject in connection with the fact that the intermediate point polling is not carried out final control multiplied by a coefficient 0.5

1 and 2 nd items are summed and constitute a single point monitoring.
100-point rating system of knowledge Students includes all aspects of the educational process, such as the active participation of students in the practical and lecture classes, timely testing of missed classes, high academic achievement, both theoretical knowledge and practical skills for forming logical, clinical thinking , improving the quality of students' independent work, logging subordinators, lecture notes, active participation of students in scientific societies, competitions on the subject. 100 point rating sitema knowledge evaluation, including various kinds of control, indicates the amount recruit students rating the ball and the percentage of achievement in the subject.

Principles of the rating evaluation of the student's knowledge, evaluation of performance, evaluation criteria, the level of preparation are presented in Table 2. According to the normative recommendations used 8 rank score of knowledge with a positive 1- 5, 6-8 degree unsatisfactory assessment requires retake, 8 degree - points of presence of the student in class when a student is absolutely not ready to engage and participate in the discussion.

The system of assessing students Table number 2

№	Progress in% and scores	definition of assessment	evaluation criterion	level of training
1.	91-100	Very Well "5"	Evaluate, synthesize, analyze, apply, knows, understands	4th level creativity
2.	86-90	very good "5"	Analyze, apply, knows	3rd level skills
3.	71-85	Ok "4"	Applies realizes knows	3rd level skills
4.	65-70	Very satisfactory "3"	Understands, knows	Level 2 reproduction
5.	55-64	Satisfactorily, ie meet minimum requirements "3"	knows	Level 1 representations
6.	54-41	Poor, weak, more work is needed "2"	Poor knows	On the Level poorly is
7.	Менее 40-21	Disappointing, requires significant additional work "1"	does not know	O - Level. Is not
8.	20-10	“О”	point of presence	O - Level

Monitoring:

Number of workshops in Internal Medicine:

course at the VI 288

VII on course 240

The maximum score for the 1 practical zanyatie- 100 points

55% of the maximum rating score of 1 lesson is - 55 points

Visit score 1 practice session 10-20 points

Number of lectures on internal medicine

course at the VI 10

at the VII informed 9

Visit 1 score 10 points lectures

A student who receives less than 55% of the maximum rating points on the current control has the ability to learn for 1 week and retake the class if the student is not able to deliver within one week practical training material, in this case the score remains the same without the right to retake.

Table number 4

Criteria for evaluation of the current survey:

levels of estimates	rating scores	Characteristics of the student
Very Well 86-100%	96-100 91-95 86-90	The answer is original and of the highest quality, exceeding the requirements of the program. High quality clinical thinking and implementation of practical work, registration of medical history and the presence of lecture notes, books subordinators and workbook, presentation and active participation of presentations at conferences morning, in response to the use of data over the Internet sessions, active participation in clinical and case parsing alert and curation of patients in the hospital, as well as service calls in the clinic. The high quality of the response exceeds the requirements of the program, good works and their clearance, the availability of lecture notes, books subordinators and workbook, make presentations at the morning conferences, active participation in clinical and case parse alert and Curation of patients in hospital and service calls polyclinic high degree of design history and outpatients. Correct, performances by the secondary literature, the correct execution of skills, availability of lecture notes, books subordinators and workbook, proper patient records, active participation in morning conferences, clinical and case parse alert and Curation of patients in the hospital and service calls in the clinic .
Well 71-85,9%	81-85,9 76-80 71-75,9	The answer is of good quality, relevant programs, active implementation of practical work, the availability of lecture notes, books subordinators and workbook, timely and correct completion of case histories and outpatients, quality Curation of patients and hospital duty and service calls in the clinic. Answer Well, basically meeting the requirements of the program. Good execution skills, availability of lecture notes, books subordinators and workbook, timely and correct completion of case histories and outpatients, quality Curation of patients and duty in the hospital, call service in the clinic. The answer is above average, there may be some error in the performance of work or negligence in the design of protocols and lecture notes, books subordinators and workbook, as well as record-keeping in the hospital and clinic.
satisfy 55-70,9%	66-70,9 61-65,9 55-60,9	Satisfactory answer highly having inaccuracies, errors in individual work performance, reception of patients and service calls in the clinic, duty, Supervision patients in the hospital, the availability of lecture notebooks, books subordinators and workbook, but insufficient maintenance of them inaccurate and untimely clearance records in the hospital and in the clinic. Satisfactory answer an average degree, the answer has serious error has errors in the implementation of practical skills, record keeping in the hospital and in the clinic, lecture notebooks, duty, Supervision of hospital and clinic service calls performed well enough. Satisfactory answer poor quality - has serious errors, practical skills have not been fully when completing the documentation in the clinic and the clinic, subordinators book and workbook mistakes, lack of lecture notebooks, poor quality reception of patients and service calls in the clinic, duty, Supervision patients hospital.
not satisfactory	20 - 54,9	Unsatisfactory response - a critical error (not certified), unable to perform the practical skills, delayed filling, Serious errors in record-keeping in the clinic and in the clinic, subordinators book and workbook, no lecture notebooks, untimely performance of tasks in the clinic. Admission of patients, service calls, clinic patients and Curation duty performed poorly.
	20	Point of presence on the lab. Lack of implementation of any requirements imposed on employment, lack of necessary documentation and failure to fill them, poor duty, Curation of patients in the hospital and service calls in the clinic.

Criteria for assessing the monitoring

55% of the maximum rating of the current survey points - 55 points.
Current rating point practical training in a hospital is made up of:

- Assessment of theoretical knowledge of students in each practical class and degree of participation in the interactive teaching methods (theoretical approach), a maximum of 30 points;

- Evaluation of the ability to analyze the data obtained in the analysis of thematic and supervised patients, reports on alert and use of knowledge in practical situations (decision of situational problems) - analytical approach, a maximum of 30 points;

- Evaluation of the development of practical skills, interpretation of laboratory and instrumental, functional studies, and treatment assignment, documentation (practical approach), maximum 40 points.

Current rating point practical sessions in the clinic consists of:

- Assessment of theoretical knowledge of students in each practical class and degree of participation in the interactive teaching methods (theoretical approach), a maximum of 30 points;

- Evaluation of the ability to analyze the data obtained in the analysis of thematic and received patients, reports on service calls and use of knowledge in clinical situations (decision of situational problems) - analytical approach, a maximum of 30 points;

- Evaluation of the development of practical skills, interpretation of laboratory and instrumental, functional studies, and treatment assignment, documentation (practical approach), maximum 40 points.

Monitoring of theoretical knowledge in practical classes evaluated various interactive methods: role play, the decision of situational problems, tests, "brainstorming", "handle on the middle of the table," "tour of the gallery," "snowballs", "incident", and clinical audit m., etc. ..

In the assessment of the current control is to control the presence of visiting lectures and texts of lectures.

If the student is attending school, but was not prepared for it and do not learn the necessary theoretical material and practical skills, he put only "point of presence", which is 20 points. Student during the week given the opportunity to retake the class. If it did not work activity during the week, a minimum score remains unchanged.

Visiting lectures and practical classes is mandatory. Students who have three or more "NB" or row 2 "NB" must obtain permission from the dean's office to work out practical exercises. Orders recorded in the academic journal. Testing sessions for all courses are held in the form of night, for students with children and pregnant women daily duty in the clinic and demonstration of theoretical knowledge and practical skills in the morning of the conference. Preparation of students estimated present at a morning conference faculty collectively.

In developing the practice session used a factor of 0.8. If the student will be able to work out lectures, then the average score for this one lecture deducted 3 points, if you do not run for -5 points. Developing practical and lecture classes, and their rating points are recorded in the appropriate section of the academic journal in the notebook morning conference and shall be signed by the Head of Department (the cycle of Endocrinology responsible professor).

The final rating of each of the current classes exhibited at the end of classes in the academic journal, the students declared and recorded in the screen performance.

Upon completion of the current studies are summarized scores of all workshops and divided by the number of practical training. Then the average score of practical employment multiplied by a factor of 0.45.
Independent work of students
Based on the independent work of students (IWS) is set as 100 point system on a daily basis in a special part of the school magazine. CDS is performed student audience on the chosen theme, in accordance with the curriculum of discipline, based on the latest modern world these materials in the form of reporting, scenario movies, cooking tables, slides, preparation of case studies, clinical situations, tests, crossword puzzles, patterns and laboratory instrumental studies, participation in clinical and post-mortem conferences, clinical analyzes of patients and audits carried out at the expense of duty in the clinic.

CDS for the current academic year at the Department of pre-planned, and at the beginning of the school year, details of its forms (list of topics and assignments) are offered to students. Students are given the right to choose the topics and tasks, and during the semester, in accordance with the developed and approved schedule shall prepopodavatelyu conducting practical classes in the group and is kept for 2 years at the department.

To calculate the average score for the CDS scores are summed and divided by the number of evaluations. Then, the resulting average score on the CDS multiplied by a factor of 0.05 and an average current is added to the score. Monitoring and evaluation of students' independent work is offered as a single mean score. Information about the CCF at the Department of detail rassmotreeny position of independent work in the department.
intermediate control

The maximum score of the intermediate control Are (PC) - equal to 100 points.

PC is held in the form of problem analysis tasks. Thus the student in accordance with the syndromes studied problem should solve two problems for the solution of which is allocated 60 minutes. For each of the tasks allocated separate points and their sum is divided by 2. If a student is in the analysis of at least one problematic issue not scored 55 points, it is considered not passed the PC. Problem tasks based on the list of diseases presented in note 12 of the order of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated 23 March 2009, as well as the qualifying characteristics of GPs. The teaching staff involved in the reception of the PC is determined by the Department of supervisors on the day of inspection.

To PC only allowed those students who do not have permits for lectures and workshops. Students not admitted or by typing the first delivery of the PC at least 55 points are allowed to retake only after permission of the department head.

Table №4
Criteria for assessing students at the intermediate control

№	Assimilation in% and scores	assessment	The quality of response	level of training
1.	91 - 100	Excellent "5"	To collate, assess, analyze, apply, understand, know	4 degree: degree High clinical thinking, mastery of practical skills and theoretical knowledge
2.	86 - 90	Very good "5"	Analyze, apply, understand, know	Grade 3: degree of knowledge and skills
3.	71 - 85	Good "4"	Applies understands knows	Grade 3: degree of knowledge and skills
4.	65 - 70	Full satisfactory "3"	Understands, knows	Grade 2: the degree of ability to learn
5.	55 - 64	Satisfactorily completed the minimum requirements "3"	Know	1 degree: the degree of representation
6.	54,9-41	Not satisfactory, more work is needed "2"	Knows not satisfactory	0 degree: weak representation
7.	less40,9-21	Not satisfactory, requires constant extra work "1"	does not know	0 degree - absolute lack of representation
8.	10-20	"0"	Point of presence on the intermediate survey	0 degree