The Continent as Object of Knowledge
185
comes a rhetorical deus ex machina that allows it to be extricated from
the thorniest of interpretive situations. Even violence in the name of the
protection of Buddhism is legitimated through a postulation of dominant
and subordinate (literally, “light” and “heavy”) principles.
132
That said, Jien anticipates some of the difficulties his theories present,
and in the seventh and final scroll of his work, he announces that he will
present the idea of the principle in a “manner that is slightly easier to
grasp.”
133
Here, he offers seven diff erent refractions of principles, most of
which can be mapped to discrete historical periods. Yet this schema, too,
falls into redoubling and abstract rhetoric that does not make Jien’s con-
cepts much more accessible. Even in his short summary, principles are
variously manifest or obscured and implementable or not. The sixth is
extreme in its circularity but is particularly germane in that it applies to
the present (the thirteenth century): “In this way, principles are impos-
sible to classify (
Dostları ilə paylaş: