The Financial
Brand
. [online] 19 Dec. Available at: https://thefinancialbrand.com/news/digital-
transformation-banking/digital-banking-transformation-trends-for-2023-157279/.
13
Chapter 1: Digital Banking
1.1. Short history of banking
The development of digital banking has followed that of technology and the
internet. It began with the appearance of the first ATMs and the first electronic bank
cards in the 1960s, a period when the majority of banking customers began to accept
and trust new technologies (Bátiz-Lazo, 2018).
In the 1970s, the development of computer technology, the creation of the
first electronic transaction systems and the establishment of the SWIFT payment
network were a major step in the evolution of digital banking (Scott & Zachariadis,
2012: 5). This was followed by the development of the internet in the 1980s, which
enabled retail banking customers to use the first digital channels for their transactions.
In the period 1980-2000, digital banking is now also used by home users, and the
term 'on-line' is introduced, which refers to the combined use of a terminal, keyboard
and computer screen to access banking systems via the user's telephone line
(Schulte, 2008).
From the 1990s until 2000, digital banking was increasingly chosen for
banking transactions (Salehi & Alipour, 2010: 202), reaching its peak at the dawn of
the 20th century. Wireless technology and widespread use of smart phones ushered
in a new era in digital banking, which fundamentally changed the way banking is
done. The percentage of customers who now choose digital banking to conduct their
transactions is believed to be as high as 60% (Beers, 2022).
1.2. Digital Banking
Digital banking refers to all banking services that are carried out with the help
of technology and especially the internet (Aladwani, 2001: 214). The transition from
traditional banking to digital banking has been gradual and is still ongoing (GateHub,
2020). The rapid growth of technology has brought about tremendous changes in the
banking sector as well (Ismail, 2018). These changes in the banking sector did not
happen by chance, great importance was given to the fact that banks had to take
advantage of new technologies. In Greece, the four systemic banks had developed a
plan starting in 2016, which emphasized the adoption and promotion of new
14
technologies. The aim of the country's banks is to create a solid foundation in order
to take more decisive steps as the ever-changing developments require it. According
to a survey by consulting firm Ernst & Young titled ‘Global Banking Outlook 2018’,
digital transformation was the top priority for 85% of banks globally in 2018 (EYGM,
2018).
According to the same survey, banks considered investing in new
technologies to improve their efficiency as important parameters for their success.
but also risk management. Addressing cybersecurity was a top priority for global
banks by 89% in 2018. Also another factor that helped e-banking was its low cost.
According to a survey, twenty-two percent of owners say more than a quarter
of their business is currently transacted online, but 32% expect that to be the case
within the next five years (Newport and McMurray, 2018).
1.3. New Trends
The rapid expansion of digital banking has made it necessary to transform the
current strategy of banks to include all the channels used by their customers (Internet,
mobile phones, physical branches), offering a range of digital products such as
phone banking, online banking, mobile banking, etc. (Kaur et al., 2021: 107).
The multiple benefits of digital banking have led bank managements to
prioritize investments in digital banking technology over conventional banking models.
The main factors shaping the future banking industry following the onslaught
of the digital age are (Abbott, 2022):
⚫
Changing customer behaviour as well as changes in their expectations of the
Banks served to date.
⚫
The constant pressures from bank regulators.
⚫
Super-apps are dominating more aspects of the digital world and human
interaction. Banks face a high-stakes choice to compete or collaborate.
⚫
As Environmental, Social and Governance concerns grow, banks are being
urged to become guardians of the planet. There will be costs
—but the returns
are sure to make it worthwhile.
⚫
Fintechs and other trends
⚫
“Free” products from digital-only challengers and BNPL firms are forcing banks
to be more transparent
—and more creative—with fee structures.
15
⚫
Banks are looking for ways to have meaningful conversations with customers in
digital spaces. Technology like AI can help make the human connection.
⚫
With crypto currencies here to stay, experiments like Central Bank Digital
Currency Trackers are gathering momentum. The search is on for use cases that
prove the economic benefits.
⚫
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in banking now surpass humans in
some tasks. Applying this tech will bring zero waste operations within reach.
⚫
The next payments revolution will stem from open networks, which empower
banks to reimagine their payments offerings for newly-demanding customers.
⚫
Search for growth in international markets
⚫
The pandemic disrupted the supply chain for banks’ most critical asset: talent.
Competition is rising. Winners will transform themselves as employers.
1.4. Advantages of Digital Banking
In recent years, online banking has been gaining more and more users, who
are fascinated by the positive aspects of digital banking (Shamdasani et al., 2008:
132).
Some of the advantages of e-banking are the following (Franke-Folstad,
2022):
⚫
Immediacy: It is true that the user can choose the time to carry out his
transactions as well as the place, 24 hours a day and 7 days a week and even
from any place he wishes. Also electronic banking knows neither holidays nor
public holidays, the transaction can be carried out and can be seen on the first
working day in the system.
⚫
Easy to use interface: the interface of electronic banking is increasingly user
friendly, by pressing simple buttons, with videos and online explanations it
becomes possible to use it even people who are not so familiar with technology.
Alternative means: one can, as mentioned above, carry out transactions in many
ways,
i.
from their computer,
ii.
their mobile phone, their smart watch,
iii. by phone, mobile wallet.
iv. Via ATMs
v. By means of cards and POS
16
⚫
Sense of control: the e-banking user can see on his screen step by step the
movements he makes , after executing the movement he wants he will have to
give the final confirmation before the movement is valid, having even been
informed of the supplies that will have occurred. He can also at any time see the
history of the moves he has made.
⚫
Update. He can check if the transaction he made on his own was done, when,
and at what time. He can also learn about new products of the Bank and new
services offered by the banks.
⚫
Organization. It makes it easier for the user, with proper planning, not to forget to
fulfill his obligations, with a simple transfer order.
⚫
Cost: the commissions required by banks are lower through their website than
from the branch. It makes sense since it does not require the help of a bank
employee for each transaction. The user of the online banking page becomes a
bank employee all by himself.
⚫
Automation of transactions: the user can by standing orders schedule some
payments so that they are made automatically. That is, when he knows the date
when an account expires he gives a standing order electronically to have the
payment happen a specific day of each month without any additional movement
for each month, as long as of course there is money through in his account.
Especially in payments that may incur interest in case of delay the standing
order policy can be very useful.
⚫
Security: most importantly, banks ensure that customers can enjoy all of the
above in a secure environment. Security through e-banking is ensured by strict
standards and safeguards such as the unique user code that each transactor
has, the pin number required for each login to the internet site, the code
confirmation that comes on the mobile ,are some of these safeguards
Besides, banks are wasting time and money in this area by hiring specialized
staff and programs that provide them with the security that their customers require.
Properly trained staff is key to the successful implementation of a digital reform.
Continuous and adequate training, using them in the right position and properly
evaluating their skills as well as their opinion on processes and suggestions can
solve problems in processes and techniques that could not be implemented digitally.
A properly and technologically trained employee will have an even more correct
opinion on the outcome of actions.
Similarly, from the banks' side there are some benefits, such as:
⚫
Reduction in costs; with the help of digital banking banks use much less staff
and thus save money.
17
⚫
The services provided are always active. The service offered is 24 hours 7 days
a week and 365 days a year. All the bank's customers, whether through
branches or web are served better and faster since e-banking helps to avoid
crowding of bank customers in the branches and no queues
⚫
Banks can serve even their customers who are located in small areas and
remote from the city.
⚫
By developing innovative services and technologies, banks enhance their
competitiveness, their reputation and their customer base. This results in
attracting more customers.
⚫
Banks can gather a significant number of statistics. quantitative and qualitative
characteristics resulting in the development of their products and services.
1.5. Disadvantages
Digital banking also has some disadvantages. On the customer side the main
disadvantages are (Natter, 2019):
⚫
Specific technological equipment is required to be able to connect to a bank's
digital page, one must have a computer or smartphone and definitely an internet
connection.
⚫
It is required to be knowledgeable in a specific expertise. Internet pages are very
user friendly however however the user should be familiar with the use of
electronic media.
⚫
Distrust: a major hurdle to overcome in order to use e-banking was that
customers had to be convinced to trust the new technologies. Customer mistrust
often stems from the lack of physical contact with employees, and there is
always a fear of the security of transactions due to external factors or personal
error, in which case, of course, the cost is not borne by the banking institution
but by the customer himself.
There are some disadvantages on the bank's side as well, such as:
⚫
Initial investment and maintenance costs: banks have to spend huge amounts of
money on the new technologies necessary to provide all these services to their
customers. There are new products appearing every day and increasing the
competition between banks, whose staff is discovering new improvements every
day so as to attract more customers. Therefore, in addition to the costs required
for the design and implementation of the banks' network ,an additional cost is
18
required for the maintenance of this network and for its evolution and adaptation
to the new technologies that are constantly emerging.
⚫
Costs of educating customers: new technologies are not familiar throughout the
world, especially to older people. Banks employ qualified staff who give
instructions at all times by telephone. There are also video tutorials on the banks’
internet sites which make it easier for users. Advertisements are also used from
time to time which also contribute to the same purpose. Especially after the
pandemic, there are many difficulties in visiting a branch, such as: having to
make an appointment first, withdrawing or depositing more than a certain
amount, paying pensions only by card, etc., all of which force even older people
to use the electronic banking system, usually with the help of someone close to
them, of course.
⚫
Security of transactions: Another major cost incurred by banks is transaction
security, either through updating and upgrading security protocols to ensure the
solvency of transactions and protect customers from fraud or even through
closed circuit monitoring at ATMs. In recent years, the number of people using
digital banking has been increasing, but this has not happened by chance, banks
have slowly convinced and educated their customers.
1.6. The digitalisation of banks in the face of the pandemic
Beyond the impacts the COVID-19 pandemic has had on human health, the
virus has had a significant impact on regional and worldwide economies, at the level
of all economic sectors, with particular significance in the sphere of technology. The
pandemic crisis has been compared by analysts to the phenomenon of the black
swan, which is a sudden, unexpected event of significant significance that causes
serious consequences and profound changes in the political and economic
environment. The COVID-19 pandemic crisis has impacted corporate operations and
performance and increased demand for contactless financial goods and services.
Infection control measures like social exclusion and lockdowns of specific areas of
society were implemented to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The vital part that
digital infrastructure may play in the quick provision of services by banks and other
financial institutions has been underscored by this pandemic. The magnitude of the
changes may be seen in the fact that, globally, 76% of adults now have a bank
account, up from 51% a decade ago, and that, in developing countries, 71% of
individuals now have one, up from 42%. When there were mobility constraints and
19
when the government considered restricting the usage of cash because it was
unhygienic, the highest rise in digital payments was observed. Despite all the
negative consequences on most economic sectors, other activities showed
increasing patterns, particularly in the area of internet commerce, which created a
demand for digitalization in order to conduct online business. The conditions imposed
by the epidemic have caused people to do more transactions online, which has sped
up the adoption of banking and financial digitalization, including technical
advancements in banks, in order to boost their efficiency and offer present clients
better services. Due to pressure from central banks and governments to absorb the
shocks brought on by the pandemic crisis to the economy, which had an impact on
their profitability and performance, banking institutions also played a significant role
in supporting the real sector. To lessen the impact of the pandemic crisis on homes
and businesses, governments in European nations have taken a number of actions
(Doran, Bădîrcea and Manta, 2022: 1-2).
The surge in e-commerce and contactless payments brought on by the
epidemic has led to more initiatives in the field of payment services, boosting up-and-
coming competitors that pose a threat to established companies and could reduce
bank earnings in the next years. For individuals and businesses looking to exchange
money, banks often serve as a gateway in traditional business models in the
payment services industry. Banks are the ones exchanging information on amounts
to be debited/credited and paying outstanding balances via the central bank, despite
the fact that the front-end infrastructure may differ (e.g., debit cards, credit cards,
online banking, and other remote banking services for businesses) (Resti, 2021).
20
Image
1
Traditional
business
models
in
the
payment
services
sector
(https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_IDA(2021)689460)
In the past 15 years, new initiatives and technologies, whose potential has
been further increased by the epidemic, have reduced the market dominance of
banks.
Image
2
Examples
of
new
business
models
in
the
payments
arena
(https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_IDA(2021)689460)
First (Case I), new payment processors with a focus on e-commerce
transactions have emerged, giving consumers a quick and secure way to transfer
21
money (often with free insurance coverage on their online purchases) and giving
merchants the chance to sell products and services globally using a single tool in
exchange for a fee. Second (Case II), non-financial businesses such as e-commerce
websites and phone companies have begun running their own "electronic wallets,"
giving customers a simple and affordable way to exchange money among
themselves, sometimes focusing on small transactions for which traditional transfers
would prove to be too time-consuming and unprofitable. In both Cases I and II, new
payment providers can choose to become chartered institutions to acquire access to
central bank settlement or they can use a bank to handle interbank payments. In the
meantime (Case III), new distributed technologies have made it possible to conduct
payments without depending on the banking system or even the Central bank. This
includes crypto-assets (which, however, do not provide a reliable means of payment
due to the significant volatility in their market value) and global stablecoins, which
can be pegged to actual currencies and backed by a sufficient amount of low-risk
assets (Resti et al., 2021). Traditional lenders' profitability is under risk due to the
entry of non-bank companies in the payment services industry. In order to provide
the same simplicity of use, standardization, and service breadth given by the new
entrants, institutions must improve the accessibility of their systems since more and
more consumers have grown accustomed to alternative channels throughout the
pandemic. This necessitates considerable IT expenditures and can result in
additional consolidation. Banks have also been embracing Internet-based platforms
(including sites owned by non-financial companies) as an outlet to approach new
clients and sell customized goods with minimal distribution costs in response to the
growing involvement of new entrants in traditional payment services (Resti, 2021: 22).
According to Fu and Mishra (2021), the Covid-19 crisis has significantly
increased the amount of new technology testing and adoption in the EU financial
sector. Customers' lifestyle changes as a result of the pandemic have been found to
have increased willingness to trust the security of internet/mobile banking services, a
favorable perception of the usability of new technologies, and an increase in the
perceived utility of these services, according to Baicu et al. (2020). In line with this
development, the EBA recently conducted a survey on the use of digital platforms by
banks, including comparators (websites that compare products provided by various
institutions), platforms managed by institutions to provide access to third party
services, platforms marketing non-financial goods and providing bank services as a
side product, ecosystems (i.e., platforms acting as a single point of entry to
numerous third-party providers, both financial and non-financial), and enablers
(platforms enabling access to pre-existing payment tools and leveraging data for
22
service extension). Travel booking websites that offer insurance or foreign exchange,
real estate companies that offer credit and/or insurance products, and online retailers
that offer installment loans are a few examples of non-financial platforms that
advertise banking services. These agreements, often known as "banking as a
service" or "BaaS," entail the payment of a brokerage fee to the site owner, who
retains ownership of the distribution network (and may decide to switch to a different
provider in a way that is almost unnoticeable to the final customer). However, they
also bring about a number of benefits, giving banks an inexpensive, novel approach
to expand their customer base and develop their product lineup, according to a
recent study of retail bank executives.
Image
3
Potential
benefits
of
the
BaaS
model
(https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_IDA(2021)689460)
Ecosystems differ from traditional business models in that banking services
are offered with other financial and non-financial products on the website, not as an
add-on service. In turn, they are distinct from enablers (typically, large technology
companies), who frequently operate in situations where a contractual relationship
with the customer already exists (for example, a deposit account) and who facilitate a
new method of payment (for example, a digital wallet hosted on the customer's
smartphone that allows payments through an NFC terminal or a QR code). According
to the European Banking Authority (2021), the increased use of digital platforms
offers a variety of potential opportunities for both EU clients and financial institutions,
as it can make it easier for customers to access financial products and services while
23
giving lenders new ways to meet rising demand without incurring the costs of a
traditional sales network. However, as more and more lenders rely on digital
platforms to sell their products, this could lead to the emergence of brand-new
arrangements in which banks and non-financial entities are financially, operationally,
and reputationally dependent on one another.
In addition, the communication between bank supervisors and authorities
overseeing digital platforms run by non-financial entities may prove untested and
slow to respond (given the sector's rapid rate of innovation and the frequent provision
of cross-border services). Non-financial entities that act as middlemen between
lenders and customers are typically less regulated than financial institutions. For
banks, who believe they would suffer reputational harm if the services offered
through digital platforms were disrupted, this may lead to instability and some sort of
"step in risk." Network economies that reward huge platforms and anti-competitive
behavior that creates a highly concentrated market may also make institutions more
dependent on third-party platforms. Digital platforms' capacity to attract new clients
unfamiliar with financial services could also present challenges in terms of misselling,
conduct risk, and customer protection (including, e.g., complaint handling, as the
provision of banking services relies on multiple players and individual responsibilities
may become blurred). Concerns over privacy protection may also arise from the
platforms' use of personal data to profile user behavior and interests. Recently, the
European Banking Authority recognised these dangers and outlined a variety of
potential solutions (European Banking Authority, 2021).
24
References
Abbott, M. (2022).
Dostları ilə paylaş: |