Strategy of the development of the government in the

Word 
Synonyms 
Antonyms 
Legal 
Legitimate, 
lawful, 
justifiable, 
regulation, 
authorized, constitutional 
Legit, 
licit, 
allowable, 
permissible, 
proper, 
statutory, noncriminal, right 
Illegal, unlawful, wrongful, illicit 
Criminal, 
illegitimate, 
immoral, 
corrupt, wicked, prohibited, sinful 
Guilty, unauthorized, forbidden,
Unjust, lawless, impermissible 
Iniquitous, unconstitutional 
Reprobate, outlawed, banned 
under-the-table, under-the-counter 
nonconstitutional.
Lawyer 
Attorney, counsellor 
Advocate, counselor 
Solicitor, counsel 
Prosecutor, jurist 
attorney-at-law 
Defendant, 
accused, 
accuser, 
plaintiff, client, culprit, offender, 
perpetrator, prisoner, suspect. 
Verdict 
Decision, opinion, 
Conclusion, determination, 
Judgment, judgement, 
Resolution, diagnosis, 
Award, 
view, 
Sentence, 
deliverance, Call, decree, 
Instruction, mandate 
Choice, conviction, 
Adjudication, consensus, 
Order, directive, Selection, 
option, disposition, edict, 
Tie, halt, draw, deadlock, stalemate, 
standoff.

---

40 
Commandment, belief, 
last word, behest 
 
Polysemy in legal wording 
While synonymy depends on the relations among lexical units, polysemy applies to 
one lexical unit having numerous implications. In this sense, polysemy is very near 
homonymy yet the beginning of polysemic and homonymous words contrast. 
Conventional comprehension of homonymy [or contrastive vagueness in 
Pustejovsky's getting it, 1996: 2], rather than polysemy (or corresponding 
uncertainty), is that homonyms have no normal etymological roots or premise 
while polysemes have created from one normal structure and gained unique or 
changed implications through their devolution. 
We would keep up with Poštolková's presumption [1983: 24, 27] that expressed 
homonyms, should these be found, are similar lexical units having a muddled 
termto-idea connection and utilized in various parts of science. Hence, we contend 
that unadulterated homonymy inside one overall set of laws exists in neither 
legitimate English nor lawful Uzbek. 
The issue that legal counselors as well as interpreters face is broad polysemy 
coming about because of an overall propensity in the dialects to relegate new 
implications to the current jargon, for example detecting extension inclination. A 
polysemous term has a few shades of importance, pretty much obviously 
detachable however with a premise in similitude [Malmkjaer 2005: 108]. Riggs 
(1982: 160), (1993: 207), in making sense of the substance of polysemy, extends 
the grouping guaranteeing that valence signifies the sort of term-toconcept 
relationship: when a word has one and only one importance, it could be called 
univalent (or monosemic), and when it has at least two implications it is 
multivalent (polysemic or polysemous); a multivalent (polysemous) term that 
includes just a single significance inside a given talk local area can be called 
unequivocal, though when it has a few implications in such a local area, it is 

---

41 
appropriately called dubious. An unambiguous utilization of a dubious term might 
be accomplished where authors supply logical signs to show which of its potential 
implications is planned. The easiest context oriented clue might be a premodifying 
classifier connected to the thing term, for example, capture warrant or offer 
warrant rather than a sole warrant, or a postmodifying qualifier, for example, writ 
of execution or writ of request contextualizing the head term writ. 
Recognizable proof of polysemic articulations in a legitimate text is troublesome, 
on the off chance that certainly feasible, without an adequate information on the 
individual legitimate issue and without a sensible setting accessible which outlines 
the point, a part of regulation, text-type, and so on. For instance, demeanor has 
three (fundamental) divisible implications in custom-based regulation: 
1. the demonstration of moving something to another's belonging (for example 
testamentary 
attitude); 
2. a last settlement of a case by court (in this sense it is all the more broadly 
utilized in the USA; in the UK this term is typically restricted to choices of 
adolescent courts); 
3. an arrangement in a rule (for example general manners). Conceivably the fourth 
significance (albeit not extremely continuous) can be referenced: 
4. individual personality of attributes of character. 
Each of the four implications will require different TL counterparts thinking about 
the standards of target regulation; generally the degree of uncertainty in the 
objective text might rise. Čermák [1995: 244] talks about contrastive polysemy 
(for example translational or bilingual) which ought to be considered especially by 
etymologists accumulating bilingual word references.