121
Sophie 6).
Although the new curriculum was being introduced throughout their time in
primary school, the children had yet to experience its implementation.
Teachers did
have solutions as to how to explain to the children that physical education was more
than games, one teacher said
‘we could make them more aware of what PE is’
(FGT
Eileen 3). However, the pressure of ‘keeping the children happy’ still came through;
'If
you were going to say that this is your PE, it would really want to be that exciting,
especially if they are going to consider this as the games and their PE’
(FGT Darragh
6). This feeling did not emerge to the same extent in the junior classes or in sixth where
the teachers felt that the children accepted what was done with them during physical
education time, and that they were happy doing anything, once they were out of the
classroom;
‘out of the class is what it is about for them, out of the class’
(FGT Moira
SI).
From the evidence presented in the questionnaires
and from the responses in
interviews there are some discrepancies between what the teachers reported they were
teaching and what they actually taught. For example, in the area of Outdoor and
Adventure Activities (O&AA) almost 50% of teachers responded
that they had taught
between 1 and 6 lessons of O&AA during that year when according to interview only
one teacher had taught this strand and only to a limited extent. The discrepancy could
be due to the fact that teachers were unsure as to what O&AA was when completing the
questionnaire. Responses during focus group discussions showed that some teachers
thought any off site activity or station teaching in some cases was O&AA;
‘sure golf,
wouldn’t that be outdoor and adventure?’
(FGT Michael 6)
Seventy nine percent of teachers felt O&AA was
either important or very
important, yet only one teacher was very comfortable teaching it. Outdoor and
adventure activities is a strand which was only formally recognised as an element of
physical education in the 1999 Physical Education Curriculum in Ireland. Hopper, Grey
and Maude (2000) point out the demanding nature of this strand from an organisational
perspective. Interview data suggests that this is another reason why this strand is not
being regularly taught. As one teacher puts it
‘there’s an awful lot of organisation based
around it and a lot of preparation in it’
(FGT Cathal 3). Safety challenges as outlined
by Hopper and colleagues (2000) are also a concern for teachers as another teacher
highlights
‘the fear of losing children in school grounds’
(FGT Mary JI).
The Physical Education Curriculum (Government of Ireland, 1999b),
122
recognises that development of skills and the understanding of these skills ‘form a
significant part of the curriculum in physical education’ (p. 3). In interviews teachers
agreed with the importance of the development of basic skills in physical education and
indicated that this and knowledge were the two areas they felt they were strongest in.
Yet questionnaire data revealed a lack of emphasis was placed on skill knowledge and
development of pupil understanding of physical education. Teachers (73.6%) placed ‘a
lot’ of emphasis on social development and during interviews
it was the area most
planned for in physical education at all age levels. Social development usually meant
placing a stronger child with a weaker one, or trying to have children mix more in
certain classes.
Dostları ilə paylaş: