Allmark-Kent 230
Placing
White as the Waves
and
The White Bone
within a post-Nature Fakers
context increases the profound significance of Whitehead’s
validation of their
work. Most importantly, he suggests that biologists could use these
representations “as hypotheses to guide our work,” and that “the
next phase
of
sperm whale research
should include the possibility that these animals possess
elaborate and multi-layered social relationships, societies, and cultures
” (371,
373, emphasis added). Indeed of all the authors covered in this thesis, Baird is
the one to declare most overtly
the “
speculative
” nature of her work and that it is
not
“a fantasy, like
Bambi
or
Black Beauty
” (275, emphasis added).
With the statements of Whitehead and Baird in mind, we can see that
White as the Waves
holds the most obvious potential for interdisciplinary
communication. As such, I will use this section to consider the text in relation
to: the wild animal story and other zoocentric
texts addressed in this thesis;
implications for zoocentric representation in a post-Nature Fakers context; the
text’s potential for facilitating productive, reciprocal engagement between
literature, advocacy, and science. Considering the unique qualities of the text, it
seems curious that
White as the Waves
is currently out-of-print. Apart from a
few reviews and Whitehead’s
comments above, no scholarship has been
published on this book. Although a thorough, close analysis of the text is
needed, it is not the priority of my work here.
White as the Waves
and the other
marginalized books in this
thesis deserve sustained, committed interpretation
that would distract from my overall argument. As I have stated previously, these
six twentieth-century texts provide a further method of re-contextualizing the
wild animal story and Nature Fakers controversy. Thus, due to the constraints of
Allmark-Kent 231
the current project, I will have to reserve a more comprehensive analysis of
White as the Waves
for future publications.
As Grove and Gowdy did, Baird prioritizes
her commitment to producing
a
speculative,
zoocentric
representation over ‘realism’ or plausibility. This is the
fundamental divergence these authors have taken from the original realistic wild
animal story. All three use their unique, species-specific
perspectives to
defamiliarize anthropocentric language and behaviour. They challenge
perceptions of animals as
Dostları ilə paylaş: