events.
In November 2007, riots broke out for days around Paris by African and Arab
immigrants angry at their problems in trying to assimilate into French culture
and economy; a lot of property was destroyed, although no terrorist tactics were
employed.
All of these events brought to front and center the presence of Muslims in
Europe, raising questions about their loyalties and their willingness and ability to
assimilate. Questions naturally arose: is there something “different” about Islam
that puts Muslim immigrants into a special category from other immigrants? Or
we might turn the question around: if they were not Muslim, would the problems
and issues be fundamentally different? The answer seems to be a qualified
no.
Tariq Ramadan,
a leading European Muslim, warns against what he calls the
“easy pitfall of ‘Islamizing’ problems,” that is, identifying problems of the
Muslim community as somehow linked to Islam. “We have social problems, we
have economic problems, and we have urban problems. They have nothing to do
with religion. They have to do with social policies…. But when we have
politicians who do not have social answers, they tend to essentialize the problem
claiming that these social ills stem from the fact that these people are Muslims or
Arabs.”
In short, Europe would face, indeed does face, considerable problems
with immigrants from the developing world in this era of globalization, even if
there were no Islam.
Europe presents a very different “frontier” for Muslims compared to Russia,
India, or China. Muslims in Europe are not indigenous; they are modern
immigrants who individually and voluntarily left their homelands to migrate to
non-Muslim countries to work and raise families. While some saw employment
in Europe as a temporary
move for financial reasons, increasingly their decision
has become permanent: they seek citizenship and accept their status as
minorities.
Life in contemporary multicultural Europe of course differs sharply from life
in most other parts of the world and raises new and complex identity issues. In
most cases Europe represents the first contact of Muslims with an essentially
post-ethnic and post-religious European society in which ethnicity and religion
had seemingly ceased to be important aspects of life, until massive immigration
began. And the European experience was quite new for Muslim immigrants, as
well—and to most of the rest of the developing world.
Unlike North America, Europe is not by nature an immigrant society; it had
consisted of old and well-established Western
European nationalities and
cultures often set in conservative patterns of life. Europe was, of course, long
familiar with the Muslim “Other” as the historical enemy—but usually a distant
enemy. Europe had repelled Arab forces from Muslim Spain at Poitiers in 732
CE—considered to have ended forever the prospect of a Muslim invasion and
any potential Islamization of Europe. Europeans met Muslims on the battlefields
of the Crusades. King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella in 1492 put a harsh end to
nearly seven centuries of a largely pluralistic, Muslim-Jewish-Christian
multicultural society in Spain by unleashing modern Europe’s first program of
ethnic cleansing of Muslims and Jews. Polish forces stopped the advance of
Ottoman armies at the 1683
siege of Vienna, the high-water mark of the Ottoman
move into Eastern Europe. Then Europe itself had gone on to invade and
dominate virtually every Muslim country in the world. Still later, Europe
struggled to put down anticolonial resistance of Muslim populations; Europe
dominated oil exploration and production in Muslim lands before nationalist
movements eventually took them over. The French effort to retain control of
Algeria was an intensely bloody affair and Algerians became objects of hate in
France. So European historical memory of its interactions with Islam were not
positive. But now, by the second
half of the twentieth century, an entirely new
and unexpected relationship with Muslims began to emerge with the arrival of
large numbers of Muslims as immigrants.