Uzbekistan state world languages university department of the theoretical aspects of the english language-i course paper in modern english lexicology

Discussion
After presenting and analyzing the data from the Bible, the researcher discusses the whole data to answer the research problems stated in the previous chapter. The researcher finds out the improvement of the meaning in the word God between Old Testament and New Testament. The researcher discuss about what lexical meanings and lexical relation are developed for the word of “GOD” in the Old Testament and New Testament, and how the meaning of “GOD” is developed in the Bible.
As Saussure said about the meaning in language is defined into two categories; system and speech. The system in language as analyzed with diachronic and synchronic study. The synchronic study is not discuss in this research deeply, because the focus of this research is the study about diachronic. The surface explanation about synchronic is because the relation of diachronic and synchronic study is difficult to differentiate and related each other. It is about the root of the word God that is begun with the word “El”, “Eliyon”, “Elohim”, and “Yahweh”. The word “El” until the word “Elohim” has the same root, but the word “Yahweh” has different root. This phenomenon is in term of synchronic study, it is because the word “Elohim” and “Yahweh” produced in the same time but in different place. The study about time is in the term of diachronic study that appears in the word “El”, “Eliyon”, Elohim, ilahun, Al-ilah, and Alloh. Saussure gives an opinion about this phenomenon. A linier system of internal word El to El-liyon-lohim is not able to stand alone. So, it is not only a word that is added into the word El which can be defined as the word that has meaning God. It has a rule that interact between association of word and linear system of internal word. The other linear systems are a linear system of meaning. The example is the word sweater, slipper, stapler, etc. is having the same linear system but the meaning is not the same as the word “El”, “Eliyon”, and Elohim”. A linear system and association of meaning creates a system limit the arbitrariness of the sign in language. As Saussure said about the limit arbitrariness creates sign that signified. The more arbitrary of the word is more difficult to understand.
An entity of the concrete becomes an abstract. But, there are no abstractions of the word without any concrete element that has function as foundation of that abstraction. The example of this word is the word God, Lord God, Lord, Son of God, My Lord, My God. The concreteness of the word God is still used in entire change of the word God but, the problem had been found in the last two word (My lord, My God) this word belongs to the Son of God that known as Jesus. This phenomenon makes a new meaning of the word God that mention in the first verse in Old Testament.
The researcher has gotten many lessons during the research on lexical meaning in the word of God. For the researcher, there is not any arbitrariness of the language in this word. There are complex systems in accordance with the speakers of the language. For example, the word bird-cage, because of the cage created for the bird. But, for the word bird itself, it is difficult to be analyzed. The deep understanding about the history of words need more research to know the real meaning of the word and a logic system of the meaning of the word that reflects in social term.