Science and Education in Karakalpakstan. 2023 №2/1 ISSN 2181-9203
348
ETHNOLINGUISTIC FEATURES OF THE CATEGORY "TIME" IN THE
KARAKALPAK LANGUAGE
Djoldasova Yu.
Nukus State Pedagogical Institute named after Ajiniyaz
Summary:
In this article is considered that, how branch of Linguistics, which
studies
ancient
mysteries
and
pages
of
history,
endured
through
language,
writes about Kazahk, and in the same way defines unit of time in appreciation of nomadic Kazahk
nation.
Keywords
: ethnolinguistics, category of “time”, phraseology, unit of time
Introduction
It is impossible to study the specific features of the unity of language and thinking, language
and knowledge within the framework of the programmatic, metaphysical, linguistically different
science of language knowledge. It needs a scientific paradigm - cognitive linguistics,
ethnolinguistics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics and others. The
edges of these connections
answer the questions of how the human mind is built in language knowledge, how a person
perceives the world, how the received information becomes knowledge, and how mental
constructions are created. So, these problems in the ethnolinguistic aspect V. Humboldt, F. Baos, E.
Sepir, B. Urof, A. Potebnya, N. Tolstoy, A. Kaerdarov, E. Jonpeyisov and others; in
psycholinguistics - K. Jung, A. N.
Leontiev, A. Shakhnarovich and others; Linguistically and
cognitively close people - E. Taylor, E. Rusumryan, Y. Lotman, Y. S. Stepanov, N. D. Arutyunova,
E. M. Vereshchagin, V. G. Kostomarov, etc. system of philosophical, psychological, ethnic,
linguistic theories within the framework of the theory of holistic
knowledge of the world in
scientific research defined and described the cognitive bases of the language function.
Nowadays, sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, statolinguistics, poralinguistics, ethnolinguistics,
etc., which came into the world in the process of studying the laws of development of people close
to a person, are a new field that was born due to the intersection
of the general issues of
ethnoscience and linguistics. However, scientists who consider the idea of ethnolinguistics from
different sides and at different levels (for example, W. F. Humboldt, W. Wunt, G. Schuhardt, F. de
Saussure, Baudouin de Courtenay, etc.) say that "ethnos and ethnolanguages" are completely
formed. Although it was accepted, when it came to determining their connection and harmony with
each other, different opinions appeared. Professor J. A. Mankeeva: "Ethnolinguistics is the study of
language in a way that is connected with culture, therefore, it is a study of the mutual influence of
linguistic, ethno-cultural and ethno-psychological factors in the development and performance of
language" [1 , p. 55], and shows language knowledge as a field to be considered in connection with
culture and ethnopsychology. Academician A. Kaerdar says: "Ethnolinguistics is a new and non-
biased field of linguistic knowledge, which was created to recognize
the diversity of the ethnic
group and its language" [1, page 8]. Scientist A. Qaerdar connected ethnolinguistics with language
and said, "Ethnostiń is a centuries-old path of development, its signs can arrive in the form of
ideographic inscriptions carved on stones, cultural memories, various structures. But all these are
only one of a thousand aspects of ethnic life. In the true sense of thinking and worldview, grudges
remain only in the language. Names of labor tools, weapons, light and food-drinks
necessary for life
in every situation, secrets and properties, customs, trust, customs, etc. b. says that words and
phrases,
phraseologisms
and
proverbs
can
be
reached"
[2,
p.
34.
].
Therefore, the source of antiquity, which has reached the shores of the language and reveals the
secrets of historical overlays, belongs to the field of ethnolinguistics. Professor M. M. Kopilenko