particular, two trends of Social Networking Sites (SNS) use have been identified:
first, the majority of people use two or more SNSs simultaneously because each has
its unique features and purposes (Brandtzæg, 2012); and second, people increasingly
embrace SNSs as tools for both communication and information, which help them
fulfill their informational, emotional, and social desires when used in tandem (Quan-
Haase & Young, 2010).
The findings of these previous studies are crucial for analyzing the way the members
of the Ellinika HoaxesFacebook group operate, the actions of authentication they
employ, and the overall strategy they follow in order to counter the spread of fake
news. In fact, the members of this group use social media platforms, like Facebook,
to communicate and share information about fake news (apart from other uses, which
are not part relevant to this study). Moreover, this study investigates the way the
members of the Ellinika Hoaxes Facebook group use various media during their
actions of authentication, and therefore the emphasis is more on what these Greek
users do with media in order to satisfy their need for quality content and truth.
Despite the fact that this research does not study or analyze motives for using SNSs,
the UGT is used as an overall framework to conceptualize the active role users
employ when they identify fake news on social media. In a sense, the members of the
Ellinika Hoaxes Facebook group are studied as active users who use social media
platforms and the Internet to expand their knowledge and identify fake news
distributed online. Moreover, they make use of the media in order to employ their
actions of authentication and it is clear that they cannot be categorized as a passive
audience. In fact, they employ a more active role during the communication process
with various sources on social media and the Internet. The current research aims to
address this role and, in a sense, to investigate the way the members of the Ellinika Hoaxes Facebook group use the media.
13