48
New Reflections
Shigeki’s wife.
41
Komine’s work has already drawn attention to the famil-
iar tension in medieval Japanese discourse between spoken and written
registers, and he sees the use of speech as an important gesture toward
The Great Mirror
’s project to “exaggeratedly claim its own meaning on
equal terms with lecturers’ preaching.”
42
Indeed, one can see such bra-
vado in a scene toward the end of the work, where Yotsugi explains to
Shigeki: “However, there are probably young people who don’t grasp the
principles of what [we’ve related] thus and are assuming we must be ‘pre-
varicating geriatrics.’ May the Three Treasures of this temple and the
bodhisattva appealed to by the preceptor of today’s lectures stand as my
witnesses as to whether I have purposely added even a single word of
fabrication.”
43
Such rhetoric, in addition to again emphasizing the impor-
tance of cosmological logic, fits well with Komine’s reading, which pro-
poses that this staged orality and the implied parallel it creates with the
lectures to follow enables “a twofold challenge to previous fictional tales
and narrations of history” as part of an “effort to overcome chronicles as
such.”
44
The Great Mirror
seems
to be asserting its veracity, as Komine
claims. After a few additional remarks about his honesty, Yotsugi contin-
ues: “Basically, when the world began, the human life span was 80,00
0
years.
This gradually declined, and when it had become 10
0
years, the Buddha
appeared. However, thinking to demonstrate to people the fact that life
and death are not fixed, he passed into extinction at the age of eighty,
shaving off a further twenty years.”
45
Yotsugi then talks about the extent
to which human life span varies before concluding that “for the Final
Age,” he is “an old man possessed of an extraordinarily long life.”
46
For
Yotsugi, this short explanation of cosmic time centers on the need to sup-
41. Bialock offers another potential reading of the text as “polyvocalic” (
Eccentric
Spaces
, 158–60). The roles of the narrators also play into his discussion of genre (ibid.,
160–63).
42. Komine, “Ōkagami-ron,” 594.
43. Ishikawa,
Ōkagami
, 337–38; translation
modified from Helen McCullough,
Ōkagami
, 235.
44. Komine, “Ōkagami-ron,” 594 and 595.
45. Ishikawa,
Ōkagami
, 338; translation modified from Helen McCullough,
Ōkagami
, 235.
46. Ishikawa,
Ōkagami
, 339; for an alternative translation, see Helen McCullough,
Ōkagami
, 235.
Refuge in the Past during the Final Age
49
port his claims of having an unnaturally long life. In other words,
The
Great Mirror
uses this rhetoric to support its status as an eyewitness ac-
count, rather than to enter into a discussion of time itself. Although
subsequent
Mirrors
will make something more sophisticated of this dis-
course on time, for the moment it is enough to note that in the above
passages,
The Great Mirror
clarifies that it has a larger truth at stake and,
at the same time, vouches for the extraordinariness and reliability of its
mouthpiece.
47
Komine assesses these as real interventions made by
Dostları ilə paylaş: